DNA actually disproves the evolution religion. It'd take alot of "faith" to believe one molecule of dna evolved out of nothing yet we continue to teach this to our kids in school using tax payer dollars .
2 - MATHEMATICAL POSSIBILITIES OF DNA
MATH LOOKS AT DNA—What are the mathematical probabilities for DNA to have been formed out of nothing by a chance—random—action of climatic conditions around it?
This is no little matter, for, according to evolution, everything living began when rock, dirt, water, and lightning changed itself into living creatures. If THAT act did not happen, then evolution falls DEAD as a theory. The theory requires that living creatures created themselves out of non-living materials. But without that initial beginning, evolution could not progress any farther. If accidents could not get us started, accidents could not evolve us.
In the world of living organisms, there can be no life or growth without DNA. What are the mathematical possibilities (in mathematics, they are called "probabilities") of JUST ONE DNA molecule having formed itself by the kind of chance that evolutionists claim formed all the other DNA molecules in that same organism back in the beginning?
The first two paragraphs of the next quotation contain important information about the complexity involved in just ONE DNA molecule forming itself by chance:
"Now we know that the cell itself is far more complex than we had imagined. It includes thousands of functioning enzymes, each one of them a complex machine itself. Furthermore, each enzyme comes into being in response to a gene, a strand of DNA. The information content of the gene in its complexity must be as great as that of the enzyme it controls.
"A medium protein might include about 300 amino acids. the DNA gene controlling this would have about 1,000 nucleotides in its chain. Since there are four kinds of nucleotides in a DNA chain, one consisting of 1,000 links could exist in 41000 different forms.
"Using a little algebra (logarithms) we can see that 41000 is equivalent to 10to the 600th power. Ten multiplied by itself 600 times gives the figure 1 followed by 600 zeros! This number is completely beyond our comprehension."—*Frank Salisbury, "Doubts about the Modern Synthetic Theory of Evolution," in American Biology Teacher, September 1971, p. 336-338.
You will notice in the first paragraph in the above quotation, the enzymes are formed because of the DNA, and are just as complicated as the DNA!
Among other things, the second paragraph, above, tells us that the number of possible code combinations for an average DNA molecule is the numeral 4 followed by 1000 zeros! that is not 4,000—which would be 4 followed by 3 zeros,—but 4 followed by 1000 zeros!
If that ONE code out of 4x10to the 1000th power possibilities was not instantly produced by that initial lightning bolt that supposedly produced the first living creature, —then that first creature could not live! It could not make its enzymes and fulfill all its body functions! It could not perform cell division! It could not produce offspring! Everything had to be in place all at once—instantly!
For additional information see the quotation supplement, "4 - More Mathematical Impossibilities, " at the end of this chapter.
But there were more requirements than merely your DNA code. Evolutionists speculate that a lightning bolt provided the energy to get life started in the first living organism. But that lightning bolt would have had to produce everything else in that body also, plus the energy in its food.
INSTANTANEOUS SUCCESS REQUIRED—In addition to DNA, much more would have to be included as well. Many other protein and carbohydrate materials would have to be instantly made at the same time. They would need to be arranged in the complicated structure of a living organism, and then they all would have to be endued with LIFE! Even though DNA molecules would have to be present, their chance manufacture would not impart life to the DNA nor to the creature having them. Without LIFE there is only dead inactivity, and a rotting of the collected chemicals and tissues.
One does not extract life from pebbles, dirt, water, or from a lightning bolt. Lightning destroys life; it does not make it. The energy needed for life sustenance is a continuous small amount; one immense high-amperage bolt would not, could not provide the right type of low, sustaining energy.
(At this point you may wonder why evolutionists always include lightning in their "origin of life" theories. It is due to the fact that initial chemical bonds could not be made without an energy source, and living organisms could not thereafter live without energy. Not knowing where else to obtain that initial energy, the theorists suggest that the initial lightning bolt pushed the dirt and water into a living creature without—hopefully—burning it all to a crisp! They wishfully imagine that perhaps the one bolt charged the organism with enough body energy to keep it going until, several million years later, its food source could evolve).
In order to move on upward, each successive evolutionary step would have to be successful or death would quickly result. There could be no failures.
GOLEY'S MACHINE—A communications engineer tried to figure out the odds for bringing a non-living organism with few parts (only 1500) up to the point of being able to reproduce itself.
"Suppose we wanted to build a machine capable of reaching into bins for all of its parts, and capable of assembling from those parts a second machine just like itself."—*Marcel J.E. Goley, "Reflections of a Communications Engineer," in Analytical Chemistry, June 1961, p. 23.
Likening a living organism to a machine that merely reached out and selected parts needed to make a duplicate of itself, Goley tried to figure the odds for 1500 needed items—requiring 1500 right choices in a row. Many different parts would be needed, and Goley assumed they would all be laying around near that manufacturing machine! Because many different parts would be needed, the machine would have to select from among dozens of different pieces near it. But Goley assumes that its mechanical arm will have only a 50-50 chance of error in reaching out and grabbing the right piece! Such a ratio (1500 50-50 choices) is preposterous (it ought to be one chance in a hundred million for EACH of the correct 1500 selections from among 1500 items), but Goley then figures the odds based on such a one-in-two success rate of reaches. But even with such a high success rate, Goley discovered that there was only one chance in 10to the 450th power that the machine could succeed in reproducing itself! That is 1 followed by 450 zeros!
If you are unacquainted with large numbers, 10to the 450thpower is inconceivably large.
Let me explain it so you can understand the immensity of such large numbers: According to the experts, there are only 10to the 80th power particles in all the universe! If every particle in the universe were a machine trying to do this, and each machine was making decisions at a billionth of a second, there could still be only 10to the 107th attempts made in all the universe in all time! 10 to the 450th is immensely larger than 10to the 107th, so it could never possibly be done.
1500 choices all made correctly, yet once the units were gathered in, each would then have to be put in the right positions and properly connected with one another—but that fact was not mentioned in Goley's calculation.
Far smaller are all the words in all the books ever published. They would only amount to 10to the 20th power, and that would be equivalent to only 66 of those 1500 50-50 choices all made correctly in succession!