• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

ZERO coverage, 0 MINUTES

Steve

Well-known member
Yep that about sums it up.

23 minutes coverage by CNN on the FALSE/FAKE NYT story about the two sources.

Even a few minutes ago, CNN still was pushing Shifty's misdirect on how, you don't go to the length Nunes went unless you have something to hide.. REALLY DUH, he is protecting his source from you vultures..

isn't that worth a bit of subterfuge? Is this guy that profoundly dumb?

I doubt it,.. him and the left leaning (biased) media have something to hide, Obama's failed legacy..


Oh and the story they refused to cover... well, a quick read of this would get you on the right track,......

WASHINGTON – The spying by the Obama administration on then-presidential candidate Donald Trump reportedly was even worse than what he has alleged.

And it had nothing to do with Russia but everything to do with politics.

Strassel concluded, “To sum up, Team Obama was spying broadly on the incoming administration.”


http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/obama-spying-looks-even-worse-than-trump-claimed/

the bombshell they all missed... (it took a bit as even google is no playing fair either...)

Fox News: Senior Obama Intelligence Official Unmasked Trump Associates

Fox News correspondent Adam Housley reported Friday that a well-known and “very senior” former official in the intelligence community, not associated with the FBI, directed the unmasking of private Americans working for or with President Donald Trump’s presidential transition team.

“Unmasking is not unprecedented, but unmasking for political purposes … specifically of Trump transition team members … is highly suspect and questionable,” an intelligence source told Fox News. “Opposition by some in the intelligence agencies who were very connected to the Obama and Clinton teams was strong. After Trump was elected, they decided they were going to ruin his presidency by picking them off one by one.”

Housley said his sources inside the intelligence community reached out to him

The Housley report is that Thursday’s narrative was not true–and that Cohen-Watnick and Ellis were not sources at all; rather the two men came to the aid of Nunes, who had other sources but needed to use a Sensitive Compartmented Intelligence Facility (SCIF) that was not associated with the whistleblowers’ own agency.

The sources told Fox News that surveillance of the Trump campaign began before Trump became the Republican presidential nominee July 19, and the surveillance had nothing to do with Russia, Housley said.







How hard has it been fro Nunes to investigate,...
The sources also told Housley that Nunes learned about the surveillance and the unmasking in January, before Trump entered the White House, but members of the intelligence community have been uncooperative as the chairman searched for a SCIF, where he could conduct his own deep dive into their portent. Finally, he was able to secure use of the White House SCIF inside the Old Executive Office Building, on the White House grounds, but not in the “White House.”

seams the NSAE has had a bit of a border wall erected to keep the truth hidden.... maybe Shifty should look at he profound subterfuge the IC community is playing and ask why,.. oh he knows,..
 

Steve

Well-known member
Spicer makes absurd claim, media ignores it this time...

Spicer: Reports Support Trump Claim That Obama Admin Spread Sensitive Info
The White House says reports that the Obama administration made and distributed a list of classified documents seems to corroborate Trump’s claims of monitoring.

At his daily briefing on Friday, White House press secretary Sean Spicer referred to reporting by NBC News that said Obama administration officials created a list of document serial numbers to give to members of the Senate intelligence committee "raised serious concerns on whether or not there was an organized and widespread effort by the Obama administration to use and leak highly sensitive intelligence for political purposes."

Spicer said. "I believe that the reports that are coming out day by day. … More and more, we are seeing the substance of what we have been talking about continues to move exactly in the direction the president is talking about, and that should be very troubling."


and still, Shifty and the state media claims it is about Nunes and how he had to run an investigation in secret, and hide his source.. a person they are desperate to track down to give him a pat on the back, ooops, I mean a bullet in the back, Russian style,, or is that Clinton style? I guess a North Korean handshake would do now as they must be getting desperate..
 

Steve

Well-known member
Trump's tweets ignored?

yep,.. I guess as the truth is exposed the liberals in the former state media feel a bit like bagdab bob and are just trying to stay out from under the tank roaring at them...

Wow, @FoxNews just reporting big news. Source: "Official behind unmasking is high up. Known Intel official is responsible. Some unmasked....


.not associated with Russia. Trump team spied on before he was nominated." If this is true, does not get much bigger. Would be sad for U.S.

The liberals response to his tweet..is so :cry2: intelligent.. not really, it is worth a good laugh though.. :roll:

To quote an old liberal, "It is comically ironic how" the former state media is now mute on Trump, Spicier and all their outrageous claims.. :roll: :lol:
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
It has to be so frustrating for them that Trump seems always a step ahead. :D

We can be ever so thankful that there are still a few Patriots in government. Nunes is one.
 

Tam

Well-known member
If you want to see just who is writing the news and why you should not believe the MSM just watch one of Sean Spicers daily briefings. How the man does it I don't know. I'm sure if it was me I would toss up may hands and walk out.

One reporter will ask a question about Russian interference and Sean will answer. The next will ask the same damn question with a word or two change to make it sound different, Sean repeats his answer from the first. The third reporter will ask the same friggin question again changing a word here or there and Sean has to repeat the answer again and again. For 60 minutes he answers the same question over and over with maybe one or two real news questions tossed in by a reporter actually paying attention to what others are asking.

When he gets tired of the left bias media's agenda of pushing the Russian story instead of the real story of Obama's SPYING on Trump Transition team and snaps, they run out to their waiting camera and talk about how Sean was Rude and avoided answering their questions so the White House has got to have something that they are hiding. If they think Sean is rude at times they would not want to see me watching the TV while Sean is going through what he has to go through with those idiots. Do any of them pay attention to the previous reporters question or are they all in their own zone until they get called on? Even when John Roberts comes out and talks to FOX you have to wonder where his head was when the questions were being answered. Funny thing about Roberts is what he says or how he says it depends on who he is talking to at FOX he will say it one way when talking to Shep. Smith and way different when talking to Eric Bolin.

Another thing that is funny to watch is if you are laid up and have time watch FOX for a day and see just how many different versions of the same story you get. It is no wonder people are totally confused about what is going on. Just take the reason Nunes called off the Clapper, Brennen, and Yates hearing. One hour has him calling it off as the White House told him to cut out the public hearings as the Comey hearing told the public to much. Now ask yourself what did Comey actually say other than there is an investigation into the Russian interference, which if you are not dead or a MSM reporter this was not news. It was something everyone knew already and if he wasn't investigating what the hell was he doing to earn his pay check. The next hour it is explained as He is holding off on calling Clapper Brennen and Yates in until he has had time to re-question Comey and Rogers in a closed hearing setting to get more classified answer before questioning the other three. MAKES SENSE Personally I would want to have every bit of info I could get when asking Clapper and Brennen any questions considering they have both LIED UNDER OATH.

As far as the Yates testimony that is another head banging piece of the story. One hour it is the White House/DOJ is forbidding her to testify. The next hour it is the DOJ told her lawyer she had to talk to White House as the info she would be talking about is their property. The White House did not reply to her lawyers letter when he wrote to them about the matter as the letter said if they did not hear back from the White House they were taking it as she had their OK to testify. By not replying the White House was giving her the OK as they have been in the press telling everyone involved go testify and get this witch hunt over, get it all out there so we can move on. Even on FOX, known for their Conservative leanings, you get two or three different stories so I guess all you can do is listen to them and believe what you makes sense to you. I can not blame Trump for tweeting and getting his message out to his millions of followers as you can not trust what the media is putting out

This is no different than the Nunes source to the latest info the Liberal media had names printed and reporters chancing the people around trying to get their story only to find out they were only the two that let Nunes into the Old Executive Office Building to see the documents he was told about from his TRUE SOURCE in January. Why did he go to the White House grounds? because the Obama Hold overs wouldn't let him get close to info anywhere else. If he did not want to out his source he had to go elsewhere. AGAIN MAKES SENSE.

Other thing that makes sense to me is THERE WAS NO COLLUSION between Trump and Russia and here is why. Clapper said on a national liberal bias news network there was no evidence of collusion. He said the investigation report that the DNI, CIA, FBI, and NSA delivered to Obama said NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION. You can not make me believe if that PROVEN OBAMA ADM. LIAR had any evidence that would support the Dems/Obama/Hillary narrative that he would go on Liberal TV and deny it existed. I also doubt Russia had anything to do with hacks considering the CIA has the ability to cloak their behaviour to make it look like another country did it, which makes the Coup against Hillary that has been on You Tube for months more plausible. Besides that the guy that confirmed the DNC Russian hack is friendly to Hillary insiders and hates Russia and has had past investigations called into question for the questionable work done to prove his conclusions. The Dems had to have someone other than Hillary and the Obama legacy to blame for their lose so why not pick on Russian a country that they do not want Trump to be friendly with as he might just find out about how Hillary used her State Department Office to benefit herself and hubby Bill. He might also find out just how flexible Obama was with Putin after the election where Obama laughed at Romney for his warning about Russia. How Obama's attitude about Russia changed in four short years.
 

Latest posts

Top