Agman,

I want to know what those "serious" Daubert issues were.  Was it not "testing" the theories with the definition of "testing" being totally ignored?  Taylor tested the data over and over again.  What "test" do you deem necessary?  Is there ever a "test" on this issue other than the jury deciding the case?  What is the standard for factual determinations if it wasn't the process that the trial went through?  Was it not up to the jury?