It is neither, just your trying to spin again.  Wrong again, the third explanation is that Taylor was simply wrong which is what was demonstrated in court.  I never have said the only problem with Taylor's work did or did not incorporate demand analysis.   That is just another diversion of your part as usual.  Either you don't understand or you are plain willing to spread misinformation.    

What I have clearly stated is that years when demand improved his work, just coincidently and conveniently, failed to show any so called price manipulation. That begs the question that his claimed periods of price manipulation may actually have been detecting eroding demand and not any price manipulation as perceived.  That would be impossible for you to believe since you halucinated and conceived this phony selective manipulation theory. For you to imply that his weekly model filtered all  demand changes is simply a joke. You can ponder why.