randiliana said:
Wonderful pictures!! We used to brand like that, but have moved to using a calf chute.
Tell me a little about using Lutalyse on your heifers. We are considering doing the same thing this year, but want to make sure we have enough bull power!! We have 3 bulls we can use on 40 heifers.
Randiliana, here was my experience the one other time I tried it (discussion from a previous post, for entire post: http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17278&highlight=lutalyse:
My response:
I Lutalysed my heifers the day I turned them out with the bulls, and I will definately do it again. I didn't feed mga. Out of 28 bred heifers, I'm half done. Their "due date" was March 1.
I used three bulls (a 2 year old and two yearlings). Looking back, it wasn't necessary to put that many with them, but I had an extra bull and didn't know what to expect with the yearlings. I did take one of the yearling bulls out and put him with the cows after a week.
The heifers weren't in a very large pasture (200 acres) and only had one water source and so that may have helped.
I would definately recommend trying it. I love the fact that half of my heifers are done so early in calving.
Back to top
katrina
Rancher
Joined: 14 Feb 2005
Posts: 4846
Location: East north east of Soapweed
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:35 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We do all of our AIing with just lutalyse... Run lots of bull power. because one bull might get stuck on one hiefier and miss the others... I would kinda watch the progress to see that everything that comes into heat gets covered.. We have locked a hiefier up away from the bull after we were sure she was bred.....
I don't know the condition of your cattle, but last year out of 47 hiefiers all of them came into heat the first shot except 8... And if you wait 10 days and give the ones that didn't come into heat another shot you should get them all...
_________________
Don't sweat the small stuff.
Back to top
jtg
Member
Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 16
Location: SD
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:54 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wyoming Rancher- did you notice a higher amount of opens or any other negative trade off? It seems too simple of a system to sync. the heifers without any bad things. Don't get me wrong the simplier and yet effective the system the better I like it.
JTG
Back to top
WyomingRancher
Member
Joined: 07 Jan 2007
Posts: 174
Location: Wyoming
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:51 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I had a 90% pregnancy rate and the bulls were out for two cycles. For some reason I've never had a fantastic heifer pregnancy rate in the past, and so 90% was actually good for me.
I know other people get higher rates, but I've never figured out how without increasing costs. I guess I could feed them up more, but I don't believe in feedlot developed heifers. Actually the opens were some of the heifers I'd seen cycling when they were calves (5 months old).
It seems like grain-fed heifers have "fraudulant fat", and after calving as twos, my experience has been the condition just melts off of them. If they do breed back, it usually takes until they are coming fours before their body adjusts to my forage, and they look good.
Just my observation!