• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Heads up Alberta grazing lease holders!!

Kevin sums it up pretty well. Bill 202 however looks worse than he points out. It redesignates all grasslands and specifically mentions "Special Areas". This is significant because Special Areas is not owned by the crown, it is owned by the people of Special Areas under specific legislation. Under 202 in conjunction with 36 it adds up to a redisignation and therefore a taking of what didn't previously belong to the government. Dr. Brown says this or most of what we believe 202 does are not his intention and he commits to bringing clarification amendments. I would love to take him at his word but history is not really on his side.
 
Prairie reserve buys 150,000-acre Montana ranch


Matthew Brown

A herd of bison move through land controlled by the American Prairie Reserve south of Malta, Mont. in this April 25, 2012 photograph. The reserve's operators on Tuesday, Aug. 21, 2012, bought a 150,000 acre ranch in Valley County as part of their effort to create a multi-million-acre wildlife complex for up to 10,000 bison and other animals on the prairies of north-central Montana. (AP Photo/Matt Brown)

MALTA - A conservation group said Tuesday it has bought a 150,000-acre Montana ranch in a major step toward its vision of a national park-caliber prairie wildlife preserve that has stoked fears of change in the heart of cattle country.

Steve Page with Page Whitham Land and Cattle confirmed that the family-owned South Ranch near Glasgow had been sold for an undisclosed sum to the American Prairie Reserve. The Bozeman-based group aims to create a multi-million-acre grasslands wildlife complex around northeast Montana's C.M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge.



Scientists familiar with the reserve describe it as an unprecedented initiative to restore an often-overlooked ecosystem that supports hundreds of species of birds, mammals, plants and insects. The South Ranch purchase more than doubles the amount of land under the reserve's control. It includes both private land and public land with long-term leases.

Yet some local ranchers see the group's plans as an assault on their way of life as families that stuck with the cattle business through generations of blizzard and drought are bought out.

Those critics lump the reserve's goals with a contentious federal proposal to convert a vast swath of eastern Montana into a new national monument - an idea that continues to reverberate more than two years after U.S. Interior Sec. Ken Salazar repudiated it.

The sprawling South Ranch traces its history to a pair of Civil War veterans and professional bison hunters who moved into ranching after bison were wiped out from the area. But Page said restrictions on public grazing and higher government fees - combined with the prospects of a national monument - made ranching on the land no longer viable.

"We have concluded that traditional ranching operations in south Valley and south Phillips counties are in jeopardy of becoming history in the not so distant future," Page said. "We are not suggesting this to be the correct decision for others, but consider it to be right for us."

Page said that little will change immediately on the ranch. The terms of the deal give Page Whitham a 12-year lease to continue running cattle on the property.

Yet the ranch is now on path for dramatic alterations over the long term.

American Prairie envisions a herd of up to 10,000 bison roaming its holdings and adjacent federal and state lands. It already has started pulling fences on other properties it has acquired in the area.

"When the reserve is built out, we hope to have a prairie-based, fully-functioning ecosystem which includes the free flow of wildlife across the landscape," said Scott Laird, American Prairie's director of land acquisitions. "That is the end-game, but to get there is a coordinated process. There are other people we have to work with - the Bureau of Land Management, the state of Montana and neighbors."

To date the group has raised $48 million through contributions and pledges. It plans to spend approximately $500 million to build up its land base over the next 20 to 30 years, a figure that includes maintenance costs, said spokeswoman Alison Fox.

The group had total assets of $33 million at the end of 2010, according to its 2010 tax return, the most recent available.

Major donors have included John and Adrienne Mars, candy industry billionaires who have given at least $5 million. Brother Forrest Mars Jr. gave at least $500,000. The chairman of the reserve's board of directors, Gib Myers, is a California venture capitalist who donated with his wife, Susan, at least $2.5 million.

Donald Kennedy, president emeritus of Stanford University and chairman of the reserve's scientific advisory council, said most of North America's grasslands have been drastically altered by grazing, the introduction of non-native plants and other pressures.

The proposed scale of the American Prairie Reserve offers visitors the chance to see those grasslands as they once were, he said.

"They're getting up to a level on which an awful lot of Americans can visit and develop an idea of what the environment was really like at a time before human occupancy changed it," Kennedy said.

But for those who still work the land, that prospect puts the fate of the community in doubt.

"They keep saying they're saving it. But it already looks beautiful. They're not saving anything," said Vicki Olson, a reserve opponent and third generation Phillips County rancher. "If they get their way, they're going to sell it back to the government and they're going to take it off the tax rolls. It's going to kill the community economically."

Reserve representatives said even if their long-term goal is realized, the amount of land involved comprises only a small corner of Montana.



Read more: http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/prairie-reserve-buys--acre-montana-ranch/article_e82dba05-97ef-53b2-92c7-a4beb0562a6c.html#ixzz24D4SCvSb

Its not only Canada... This park they are trying to build extends all the way into SK to the north...

And down here we see more and more opposing leasing public lands for Ag... Used to be it was just the urban folks that complained about the rancher using "free" public land - but lately a lot of opposition to public land usage is coming from farmer/ranchers that are in areas where they have none...Many of the politicians are now agreeing- and looking at selling off the public lands as a way to take care of the national debt..

And its folks like this and the World Wildlife Foundation that have unlimited funding and will be ending up with it... This ranch is in the southern part of my county and starts about 20 miles south of where I live...
 
Faster horses said:
That's the liberal agenda, OT. Don't ya just love it?

Its appearing to me that it is both a conservative and liberal agenda--now with many of the farmers/ranchers that called themselves conservatives (especially in the midwest) in areas with little public land opposing the use of this "free" public land by ranchers- and promoting to their Congressmen that the land should be sold to pay off the national debt-- which was part of a bipartisan proposal put out as a way to do that... (And if I remember right- it was originally brought forward by a large group of R cult Congressmen)...

And its these greenie weenie groups that have more access to funds than most Ag producers to buy this land when it comes up for sale...
 
Faster horses said:
I'd like to read more about who implented or supports this in the
midwest. Got any links?

Try any of the other Ag chat sites... Advantage Cattle is one- heavy with midwest posters- many that support selling off all public lands...

It's common knowledge that the greenies have the dough......supplied
by who???

Major donors have included John and Adrienne Mars, candy industry billionaires who have given at least $5 million. Brother Forrest Mars Jr. gave at least $500,000. The chairman of the reserve's board of directors, Gib Myers, is a California venture capitalist who donated with his wife, Susan, at least $2.5 million.

Horseless did a bunch of research and found these groups are all backed by the World Wildlife Fund which has unlimited amounts donated from all over the world....
 
http://www.thestarphoenix.com/business/Vast+tracts+conservation+land+threatened/7120619/story.html


http://www.canada.com/business/Plan+divest+pastures+blasted+naturalist/7118940/story.html
 
Vision of Prairie Paradise Troubles Some Montana Ranchers


Anne Sherwood for The New York Times



By JACK HEALY

Published: October 26, 2013


MALTA, Mont. — On fields where cattle graze and wheat grows, a group of conservationists and millionaire donors are stitching together their dreams of an American Serengeti. Acre by acre, they are trying to build a new kind of national park, buying up old ranches to create a grassland reserve where 10,000 bison roam and fences are few.


The privately financed project — now a decade in the making — has ambitions as big as the Montana sky, tapping private fortunes to preserve the country's open landscapes. Supporters see it as the last, best way to create wide-open public spaces in an era of budget cuts, government shutdowns and bitter battles between land developers and conservationists.

"It's a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity," said George E. Matelich, the chairman of the conservation group, American Prairie Reserve, and a managing director of a New York private equity firm. "It's a project for America."

The trouble is many ranching families here in northern Montana say it is not a project for them. As the reserve buys out families and expands its holdings — it now has about 274,000 acres of private ranches and leased public lands — some here are digging in their heels and vowing not to let their ranches become part of the project.

They say they know the transformative power of real estate out West: Western mining towns become ski havens, high mesas become ranch retreats for business moguls, and cultures inevitably change.

"We don't intend to sell," said Leo Barthelmess, 57, who was 8 when his family moved here and settled on a 25,000-acre sheep and cattle ranch. "We have children coming back. We're working on a succession plan. We want this landscape to carry on to the next generation."

Mr. Barthelmess and other ranchers say families like theirs have rebuilt the prairie, season by season, since the destruction wrought by the Dust Bowl. They work with conservation groups, rotate their herds to encourage a healthy mix of prairie grass and set aside ample room for sage grouse, plovers and herons. They are trying to till less ground, which can destroy an underground ecosystem. Some even allow small colonies of prairie dogs, which many farmers exterminate as pests.

"We've already saved this landscape," Mr. Barthelmess said.

As more of their neighbors sell, some ranchers say they worry that this corner of Phillips County, population 4,128, will sacrifice its identity. Two years ago, people here railed against the whiff of a federal proposal to create a new national monument along the Canadian border. A billboard along the gravel roads informs visitors that the county can produce enough cattle to feed more than two million people.

"These are our livelihoods, these are our businesses," said Perri Jacobs, whose husband's family has run their ranch since 1917. "This is an agriculturally based economy. That's about being able to fund our schools and our government and being able to support our businesses on Main Street."

Officials at the American Prairie Reserve say they have done everything possible to be good neighbors and have not foisted their vision on anyone. They have installed electric fences to ensure that their 275 bison do not roam onto other people's property. They allow hunting on the land. They lease back some of their land to allow ranchers to graze their cows.

They say they take an understated approach to buying land. They approach families after they have decided to sell, and sometimes negotiate arrangements that let ranchers live or work on their land for years after a sale goes through. Because the reserve project is nonprofit, officials say they can bid only fair-market value and do not artificially drive up property prices.

"It's a misnomer that we're paying top dollar," said Sean Gerrity, the president of the American Prairie Reserve. "There are some properties we're interested in, but they're currently priced at above market value and we can't go there."

Still, the financial profiles of the reserve's supporters have created a divide in a county where the average job pays about $25,400, according to Montana State University. The group has several current and retired fund managers and retail billionaires on its board, and counts heirs to the Mars candy fortune as supporters. It has raised a total of more than $63 million in donations and pledges.

Mr. Gerrity estimated it would take 15 to 20 more years to quilt together the patchwork of public and private lands that represent the group's vision of three million acres of preserved prairie. Right now, the group owns about 58,000 acres outright and has grazing leases on an additional 215,000 acres of federal land.

The reserve's goal is to revive a landscape that existed when Meriwether Lewis and William Clark passed through in the early 1800s. They have taken down 37 miles of fence. They have replanted some tilled ground with native grasses. They have pulled down barns and sheds and cleared away heaps of trash. Their bison saunter across dirt roads.

"The idea is to open this place back up," said Dick Dolan, who oversees acquisitions and finances for the reserve. "The vision is to have an ecosystem functioning as naturally as possible."

A public campground has been open for two years, and the reserve has also put the finishing touches on a camp of high-end yurts, complete with hot showers and air-conditioning. Some in the area have grumbled that sleeping in a climate-controlled yurt and eating chef-prepared meals hardly qualifies as roughing it.

But what binds the ranching families and their new neighbors is a fierce love of the land. One evening, just before sunset, Mr. Dolan stood astride a bluff overlooking undulating stretches of sagebrush and prairie grass. The Little Rocky Mountains lay to his left. The Missouri River ran behind him. In the riverbeds below, the leaves of cottonwoods and box elders were burning yellow. He spread his arms wide.

"It makes you feel like you're in the middle of the ocean," he said. "It's a big, big place. It's such a beautiful landscape."
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/27/us/vision-of-prairie-paradise-troubles-some-montana-ranchers.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Here is an update on the buffalo project... Since the Page-Whitham sale, I have heard of 2 more ranchs being bought up in Valley and Phillips County.. Slowly but surely they are building their dreams of an American Serengeti- which is part of the "Big Open" plan to have grasslands buffalo/wildlife range from Canada to Mexico..

And this article hits the nail about a divide in the area... I'm aware of one of the latest ranchers that took the big bucks waved in front of him and sold out to the buffalo people that has old friends and even family that won't talk to him anymore...
Next twenty years are going to be interesting... :wink:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top