Hey you guys

[Jason]

Pickett claimed he was unfairly discriminated against in the cash market.

No proof of injurious manipulation has been presented by anyone.

I am arguing against anyone who thinks they should sue because they can't compete in business.

 

[Sandhusker]

Pickett claimed he was unfairly discriminated against in the cash market.

No proof of injurious manipulation has been presented by anyone.

I am arguing against anyone who thinks they should sue because they can't compete in business.

Actually, Jason, the jurors decided they saw proof. It looks to me that you're backing the judge, but then you say you don't even know what his reasons were. That is confusing. How do you know which side to be on? Is it your belief that judges are always right?

 

[Econ101]

I don't have the transcripts I have just watched what news reports and the information presented here.

Agman has offered enough proof that the testimony about manipulation of the markets was untested, and thus unreliable. That alone would be enough to have a mis-trial.

I would say the same thing about the "proof" Econ tries to say he has provided about market manipulation.

Saying trust me I am sure there is a back room deal and Tyson drops the price of beef to make money on chicken unless the consumer is in a generous mood and wants to pay more for beef unless there are more imports that Tyson can make more money on, unless Wal-mart tells the gov't that the USDA should sue Canada and BSE is caused by aliens that are controlled by the drug cartels, isn't convincing proof.

Normal business transactions will influence the market. If I sell off all my cheaper bulls first the likelyhood of the price on the top bulls coming down is slim. If I can't get any bulls sold, the price comes down, or is manipulated.

Jason, thank you for dropping the derrogatory names.

By depressing the cash market with their methods, they walked down the supply curve. With the beef cycle you posted, doing this at the right time will contstrict the supply of beef. By constricting the supply of beef, pork, and chicken at the same time, the prices of all three go up (I already posted numbers of this). Remember their margins during the time. It was no sweat off of their back to do this. It just came from producers' pockets.

 

[Anonymous]

Conman: "By constricting the supply of beef, pork, and chicken at the same time, the prices of all three go up (I already posted numbers of this). Remember their margins during the time. It was no sweat off of their back to do this. It just came from producers' pockets."

ANOTHER BASELESS ALLEGATION!

Same-O, Same-O!



~SH~

 

[Anonymous]

Jason: "There are almost 12 on ranchers.net that would find against Tyson with no evidence, so a few more in the world isn't surprizing."

Exactly!

PRESUMPTION OF GUILT!



~SH~