Cindy Chilton with the Palomino Horse Breeders of America (PHBA) said she is concerned if this legislation passes what the government is going to do about neglect and abandonment, something not discussed at the hearings or in the legislation language.
Other reasons NCBA is opposing the bill include the poor precedent it would set by placing a ban on processing meat without scientific justification and the potential landfill problem the proposed ban may create. NCBA also cites a study funded by the Animal Welfare Council, conducted by six universities, showing a ban on horse processing would reduce the value of all horses by $304 per head.
Chilton said PHBA does not support the legislation as it is written due to the wording leaving unanswered questions that could cause serious consequences to those directly involved in the equine business. The most alarming portion of the bill, according to Chilton, is in the first paragraph stating: "To amend the Horse Protection Act to prohibit the shipping, transporting, moving, delivering, receiving, possessing, purchasing, selling, or donation of horses and other equines to be slaughtered for human consumption, and for other purposes." The last three words concern Chilton most.
"The last sentence says for any other purpose. That lends itself for a broad interpretation," said Chilton. "I have traveled to Washington D.C. to participate in these hearings and I have asked what this means, but I got no answer. Does this mean we can't show horses anymore? This loop has the potential to put you and I out of business."
Although Chilton does not support this legislation, she said she does not believe slaughtering is always the best option and wishes there was a better way. However, she said this bill provides no avenue to justly solve the problem.
"The longevity of a horse is a long time," said Chilton. "We're talking 20 to 30 years. What are we going to do with unwanted horses for that length of time? They say euthanasia is the best option, but what do we do with 90-some thousand carcasses?"— Mike Deering, WLJ Editor