• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Is China's Food Production Poisoning Us?

Econ101

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
7,060
Location
TX
Breaking reports on the news are now reporting that the recent pet food call tested positive for rat poisoning with respect to the grain put in the pet food. This grain came from China, they are reporting.

I find it absolutely incredible that we are importing grain from China while taxpayers are paying for CRP to take land out of production. In addition, if grain used for pet food can be tainted and come from a foreign source, what does that mean for the bread you buy at the grocery store?

OUR TRADE REPRESENTATIVES AND USDA ARE SELLING THIS COUNTRY OUT BECAUSE OF CORPORATE GREED AND "LOWEST PRICE POLICY".
 
What about those poor souls that eat dog food !This grain came from China, Proves that their was traceback to the country but Why do the Chi Coms have to sell Rat Poison too?
 
With veterinary endorsed pet foods. This deal here says it all about our pet food industry. When top of the line foods like Science Diet and Purina put feather meal in their puppy food I called University of Illinois nutritionalsit and found out that non ruminants can't digest feather meal. And it is poorly digested by cattle only in the abomasum. Just goes to show you how eager food companies are to sell cheap ingredients at an outragious price. I'd just like to say that the vets who promote this worthless stuff are doing themselves and their customers a great dis service. Of course maybe they can drum up some business that way. Of course if the pet dies from poisoning I guess they can't do much.
 
Paul Henderson, chief executive of Ontario, Canada-based Menu Foods, confirmed Friday that the wheat gluten was purchased from China.

Bob Rosenberg, senior vice president of government affairs for the National Pest Management Association, said it would be unusual for the wheat to be tainted.

"It would make no sense to spray a crop itself with rodenticide," Rosenberg said, adding that grain shippers typically put bait stations around the perimeter of their storage facilities.

Scientists at the New York State Animal Health Diagnostic Center at Cornell University and at the New York State Food Laboratory tested three cat food samples provided by the manufacturer and found aminopterin in two of them. The two labs are part of a network created after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks to keep the nation's animals and food supply safe.

"Any amount of this product is too much in food," Hooker said.

Aminopterin is highly toxic in high doses. It inhibits the growth of malignant cells and suppresses the immune system. In dogs and cats, the amount of aminopterin found — 40 parts per million — can cause kidney failure, according to Bruce Akey, director of Cornell's diagnostic center.

"It's there in substantial amounts," Akey said.

Donald Smith, dean of Cornell's veterinary school, said he expected the number of pet deaths to increase. "Based on what we've heard the last couple days, 16 is a low number," Smith said.

Aminopterin is no longer marketed as a cancer drug, but is still used in research, said Andre Rosowsky, a chemist with the Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.

Rosowsky speculated that the substance would not show up in pet food "unless somebody put it there."

Henderson said Menu Foods does not believe the food was tampered with because the recalled food came from two different plants, one in Kansas, one in New Jersey.
 
I find it absolutely incredible that we are importing grain from China while taxpayers are paying for CRP to take land out of production.

In addition, if grain used for pet food can be tainted and come from a foreign source,

what does that mean for the bread you buy at the grocery store?
 
SOME RECALLED PET FOODS IN BELGIUM, OTHER EU NATIONS 03/26/07
Thanks to Tanya's Feline CRF website for this lead: Partial translation of a 3/22/07 press release from the Belgian Food Agency:

Belgium has imported 40 boxes each containing 24 items. The Food Agency is trying to find out where these products have been sold but has not received any information from the USA supplier as yet. It is also possible that there is more than this amount on the Belgian market, possibly through import from other EU countries. Europe has imported a total of 3440 boxes.
Belgian Food Agency Press Release (in Dutch)
 
PORKER said:
I find it absolutely incredible that we are importing grain from China while taxpayers are paying for CRP to take land out of production.

In addition, if grain used for pet food can be tainted and come from a foreign source,

what does that mean for the bread you buy at the grocery store?

Being in the heartland of where some of the highest protein wheat is grown- this was the question that was being asked in the coffee houses and waterholes yesterday when I was in town...Especially since for the last several years many producers couldn't even get their seed, fertilizer, and fuel costs back out of the price locally wheat was selling for... :roll:

This is the reason I've went to buying Grains of Montana breads- costs a few cents more- but I know that some Chinaman ain't squated on the binjou ditch running thru it- or spread a little rat poison in it :roll: :( :mad:

I get to watch this grow and be harvested:

http://www.grainsofmontana.com/

On March 16, Menu Foods issued a recall that covered 42 brands of cat food and 53 brands of dog food manufactured on certain dates. On Saturday, the company broadened the recall to all its "cuts and gravy" style products, regardless of date code.

Another case of efficient mass production costing us more than its worth...
 
You got that right , But I see that our friends to the North got more Problems the sick and dying pets!

UPDATED HEALTH HAZARD ALERT
MARCELLA'S GARDEN BRAND OLIVES MAY CONTAIN DANGEROUS BACTERIA
Related Alerts: 2007-03-23 | 2007-03-22

OTTAWA, March 23, 2007 - The previous public warning issued on March 22, 2007, has been updated to provide additional information on the distribution of the affected products (please see text in bold).

Only the following Marcella's Garden brand Olives sold in 600 ml plastic tubs bearing a best before date of 31/07/2007 are affected by this alert.

Baresana Olives, lot 009/6, UPC 0 62136 90067 8.
Calabrese Olives, lot 012/6, UPC 0 62136 90070 8.
Cerignola Olives, lot 011/6, UPC 0 62136 90069 2.
Jumbo Stuffed Olives, lot 011/9, UPC 0 62136 90071 5.
Kalamata Olives, lot 005/6, UPC 0 62136 90066 1.
Nocellara Olives, lot 010/6, UPC 0 62136 90068 5.
These olives, imported from Italy, were distributed in British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario and Nova Scotia.

There have been no reported illnesses associated with the consumption of these olives yet.

Food contaminated with Clostridium botulinum toxin may not look or smell spoiled. Consumption of food contaminated with the toxin may cause nausea, vomiting, fatigue, dizziness, headache, double vision, dry throat, respiratory failure and paralysis. In severe cases of illness, people may die.

The importer, Excelsior Foods Inc., Toronto, Ontario, is voluntarily recalling the affected products from the marketplace. The CFIA is monitoring the effectiveness of the recall.

For more information, consumers and industry may call one of the following numbers:

Excelsior Foods Inc., Daniel Violante, at 1-800-845-5636.

CFIA at 1 800 442-2342. 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. local time, Monday to Friday.

For information on Clostridium botulinum, visit the Food Facts web page at http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/concen/cause/botulisme.shtml

For information on receiving recalls by e-mail, or for other food safety facts, visit our web site at www.inspection.gc.ca.
 
FDA bans China firm's gluten
Ingredient suspected in tainted pet food

By Andrew Bridges
Associated Press
Published April 3, 2007


WASHINGTON -- The U.S. is blocking imports of wheat gluten from a company in China after an investigation implicated the contaminated ingredient in the recent pet-food deaths of cats and dogs.

The Food and Drug Administration took action against wheat gluten from Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. in Wangdian, China, after the U.S. recall of nearly 100 brands of pet food made with the chemically contaminated ingredient. The pet food, tainted with the chemical melamine, apparently has resulted in kidney failure in an unknown number of animals across the country.



Wheat gluten from China has been suspected in the outbreak since the first of multiple recalls was announced in mid-March. Even more pet food could be recalled in the next few days, FDA officials said Monday.

The FDA reported last week that it had found melamine in samples of the vegetable protein source used in the recalled wet and dry pet foods and treats, as well as in cats that died after eating contaminated food.

"The wheat gluten that is positive for melamine all has come from this manufacturer," said Neal Bataller, director of the division of compliance with the FDA's veterinary medicine office. Melamine is used in plastics, glue, fire retardants and other products. Its toxicity to dogs and cats is unknown, but it is not allowed in food in any quantity.

Geng Xiujuan, Xuzhou Anying's sales manager, said the company was aware of the FDA's import alert and was looking into it. However, Geng said the company had not manufactured the wheat gluten but had instead bought it from companies in neighboring provinces. She said Xuzhou Anying sold it to another company, Suzhou Textile Import and Export Co.

"There are many other exporters and I don't see why they would just blame us," said Geng.

The FDA still doesn't know where all the contaminated imported wheat gluten ended up, though it appears unlikely any made it into human food.

Menu Foods, a major manufacturer of nearly 100 store- and major-brand pet foods, announced the first recall March 16. Hill's Pet Nutrition Inc., Del Monte Pet Products and Nestle Purina PetCare Co. all have since recalled some of their products as well.

Also Monday, Eight In One Inc., a division of United Pet Group Inc., announced the unrelated recall of all Dingo brand Chick'n Jerky treats for dogs, cats and ferrets. The treats are being recalled because they may be contaminated with salmonella, the company said. They were sold at Target, PetSmart and other stores.



Copyright © 2007, Chicago Tribune
 
"The FDA still doesn't know where all the contaminated imported wheat gluten ended up, though it appears unlikely any made it into human food. "

Maybe if we had people killing over and could be traced to a single food source, we might know. Too bad that seems the only way.
 
Melamine is used in plastics, glue, fire retardants and other products. Its toxicity to dogs and cats is unknown, but it is not allowed in any food in any quantity.
 
Does anyone know if the melamine is the same stuff they made some dishes from back, maybe in the '50s or '60s?

I think some of the mixing/serving bowls are still around and have seen them promoted as 'collectibles' in antique/junk stores relatively recently.

There are occasional warnings that teflon coated pans, plastic containers used to heat food in microwave, and other such containers are dangerous, so wonder if there is a need for concern about melamine dishes.

MRJ
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melamine

In animal studies, ingestion of large amounts of melamine in monomer form may lead to kidney stones, cancer or reproductive damage.[2][3][4][5] The melamin polymers used in household products are far less reactive than melamin proper and are not known to be toxic in humans.

In early 2007 there was a recall by Menu Foods of certain canned and pouch pet foods due to suspected contamination. On 30 March 2007, the US Food and Drug Administration reported it found melamine in the recalled pet food, in samples of wheat gluten imported from China used in the production of the food, as well as in crystalline form in the kidneys and in the urine of affected animals. The compound's presence has not been conclusively linked to the animals' deaths. It is important to note that this was melamine proper, a monomer, and not a melamine polymer as those used in household products.
 
Wheat Gluten Not Sole Source of Pet Food Poisoning

Toronto Daily News
A mounting number of complaints about sick and dying animals who ate only dry food that did not contain wheat gluten strongly suggests another source of contamination.

Although the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to blame tainted wheat gluten for recent cat and dog illnesses and deaths, a mounting number of complaints about sick and dying animals who ate only dry food that did not contain wheat gluten strongly suggests another source of contamination.

Evidence from reputable laboratories indicates that an excessive amount of vitamin D in pet food may be to blame. Vitamin D overdoses produce symptoms similar to those seen in animals who recently have become sick or died after consuming only dry foods.

This morning, PETA Vice President Bruce Friedrich made an urgent appeal to Stephen Sundlof, director of the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine, asking the agency to refocus its investigation beyond wheat gluten -- which is used almost exclusively in wet foods -- and consider other possible contaminants.

In his letter, Friedrich points out that last year, a manufacturing error in the production of Royal Canin pet food resulted in excessive amounts of vitamin D-3 in the food, causing hypercalcemia, an abnormally high level of calcium in the blood that caused animals' kidneys to malfunction.

Symptoms associated with excessive vitamin D-3 intake appear identical to the symptoms that are being reported in dogs and cats now, leading PETA to believe that vitamin D-3 may be implicated in the current spate of pet food contamination.

On Monday, PETA called on FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach to resign over the agency's mishandling of the pet food crisis.

"The FDA is feeding the public a line, and the American people's faith in the government is dying along with dogs and cats," says Friedrich. "The agency's failure to pinpoint the cause of death for animals who have eaten only dry food is cause for the commissioner to resign or be fired."
 
http://www.cnn.com/video/player/player.html?url=/video/us/2007/04/04/vause.china.pet.food.mystery.cnn&wm=10

You Never Know What YOUR IMPORTED FOOD has in it!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Ya ,thats it ,as I see it as I would rather feed my cow dogs Pure Canadian Beef from the can than the crap from Menu Foods. Notice in the above posted CNN video report the Storage Area.
 
I wonder how credible an investigation the Chinese are going to do- when they are already denying they have ever sold any wheat gluten to the US? I'm sure they are allowing the FDA complete oversight :wink: :lol: :roll: :roll:

--------------------------------------------------------------

Sen. Durbin announces hearing


By MIKE RAMSEY
COPLEY NEWS SERVICE
Published Friday, April 06, 2007


CHICAGO - Pet-food manufacturers should be punished if they delay reporting safety problems with their products, U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin said Thursday as he announced an oversight hearing into the national recall of tainted cat and dog food.


Durbin, D-Ill., said Menu Food Inc.'s voluntary recall of 60 millions cans and pouches of pet food in mid-March came several days after the Canadian company first suspected its products may have been contaminated.

"What did Menu Foods have to lose by waiting three weeks? Almost nothing," Durbin said at a Chicago news conference, where he was joined by a number of dog owners and their pets. "We've got to change that law. We've got to make sure that there are penalties for failing to report."

Durbin, a member of the Senate Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee, said chairman Herb Kohl, D-Wis., has agreed to schedule the hearing within the next two weeks. Durbin said officials from the Food and Drug Administration as well as outside experts would be among the witnesses.

At least 16 animals are believed to have died from tainted Menu Foods products, but the number could be much higher. Some families from Springfield have reported pet deaths they believe are related to the pet-food recall.

"This was a breakdown and a failure," Durbin said. "It has brought a lot of pain, a lot of heartache and a lot of worry to pet owners all across America. We can do a better job in Washington."

Durbin said the FDA should be empowered to impose recalls. He also suggested centralizing the federal government's multi-agency system of inspecting food. State governments are left to inspect pet-food plants, Durbin said, but they should operate under a standard set of FDA guidelines.

Among the reform advocates joining Durbin on Thursday in Chicago's Wicker Park neighborhood was cat lover Brian Leber. The Chicagoan became emotional as he recalled how Max, his 19-year-old domestic shorthair, had to be euthanized March 12 because of abrupt kidney failure - four days before Menu Foods' recall was announced.

Leber said he and his wife realized then that Max had eaten one of the products on the recall list.

"That became the worst day of our life, to realize a cat that was raised from a 6-week-old kitten had to lose his life by eating poisoned food," Leber said.

Durbin said the FDA should create an Internet-based warning system to alert pet owners and veterinarians of future product recalls. He said there is no evidence the tainted wheat gluten has made it into the human food supply.

A Menu Foods spokeswoman could not be reached for comment Thursday.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pet food recall grows
By ANDREW BRIDGES

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON - The recall of pet foods and treats contaminated with an industrial chemical expanded Thursday to include dog biscuits made by an Alabama company and sold by Wal-Mart under the Ol'Roy brand.

The Food and Drug Administration said the manufacturer, Sunshine Mills Inc., is recalling dog biscuits made with imported Chinese wheat gluten. Testing has revealed the wheat gluten, a protein source, was contaminated with melamine, used to make plastics and other industrial products.

China has denied responsibility for several pet deaths in the United States. "China has nothing to do with the pet poisoning in the United States," said a report in the official newspaper of China's General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, which monitors the export of food, animals and farm products.

The China Inspection and Quarantine Times said in a report on its Web site dated Tuesday that as of March 29, 2007, China had "never exported wheat or wheat gluten to ... the United States."

This contradicted comments by two employees at the Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co., this week who said the company had shipped wheat gluten to the United States.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has identified Xuzhou Anying as the supplier of the tainted gluten.


Also Thursday, Menu Foods, a major manufacturer of brand- and private-label wet pet foods, expanded its original recall to include a broader range of dates and varieties. Menu Foods was the first of at least six companies to recall the now more than 100 brands of pet foods and treats made with the contaminated ingredient.

The recall now covers "cuts and gravy"-style products made between Nov. 8 and March 6, Menu Foods said. Previously, it applied only to products made beginning Dec. 3. In addition, Menu Foods said it was expanding the recall to include more varieties, but no new brands.

The FDA knows of no other pet product companies planning recalls, agency officials told reporters.

Sunshine, of Red Bay, Ala., sells pet foods and treats under its own brands as well as private labels sold by Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Kmart, Longs Drug Stores Corp. and Stater Bros. Markets. The recall included specific brands like Wal-Mart's Ol'Roy, as well as a portion of Sunshine's own Nurture, Lassie and Pet Life dog biscuit brands.
 
More oversight of pet food urged
Scare spurs advocates to seek safeguards as concerns over safety of food supply deepen
By Jonathan D. Rockoff and Laura Barnhardt
Sun reporters
Originally published April 7, 2007
WASHINGTON // Galvanized by an unprecedented pet food scare that has killed at least 16 dogs and cats, pet owners and their advocates have begun campaigns nationwide urging members to demand that government and industry take steps to prevent such dangerous episodes.

"I feel betrayed," said Bill Thompson, a Hunt Valley banker whose 3-year-old Leonberger dog, Darwin, fell ill after eating a now-recalled Nutro product four weeks ago. Thompson, who since then has spent Sundays cooking for his three dogs, said authorities should do more testing to detect contamination, not rely on complaints from pet owners.

Check out this pet website;
http://www.howl911.com/#headlines



The scare - linked to tainted wheat gluten found in wet food for dogs and cats - comes after bacterial outbreaks in spinach, tacos and peanut butter, and deepens discontent with the government's ability to ensure the safety of the nation's food supply for pets as well as for humans.

Even food industry representatives and federal health officials acknowledge that limited resources have eroded government safeguards. The government is supposed to ensure that ingredients used in pet food are safe, but it does not need to approve pet food before sale. It also sets standards for labels.

The pet advocates say the government needs to do more. They are formulating demands for improved labeling on products and a national, centralized database for reporting problems.

"What this [scare] has exposed is there is a weak link in the food-safety chain," said Gina Spadafori, executive editor of the Pet Connection, which runs an online community for pet owners.

On its Web site, the Pet Connection has posted an advocacy guide under the heading, "Turn emotion into action." The first order of business, it says, should be a congressional investigation that produces a full report. It also demands labels providing phone numbers for consumers to call and the country of origin for ingredients.

Among the most pressing issues to emerge from the crisis, pet owners say, is the need to better equip veterinarians to report problems and learn of the latest developments.

"One of the biggest surprises that came out of all of this was that veterinarians had no idea about any of this. We need to get veterinarians in the process earlier," said John Packowski, a spokesman for Dogster, a Web site for dog lovers based in San Francisco that is developing a platform of changes.

Packowski said Dogster was calling for improvements to ensure a swifter, clearer response in the future. "We want a better course of action rather than everyone running to blogs and being confused," he said.

While acknowledging room for improvement, Bob Vetere, president of the American Pet Product Manufacturers Association, emphasized the limits of more regulation. He cautioned against overreacting to a recall affecting what he said was less than 1 1/2 percent of the pet food supply.

"There isn't a set of regulations imaginable that would have prevented this, whether in the pet food chain or the human food chain," Vetere said. Proposed labeling changes, he said, would regulate pet food more than human food.

The Senate majority whip, Richard J. Durbin, has called for a hearing on the Food and Drug Administration's handling of the scare. Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois, said the agency needs to take steps to ensure that makers promptly report problems, inspectors visit manufacturing plants, and veterinarians and owners share information.

"I want to hear how the FDA is going to work to resolve the current crisis and ensure this doesn't happen again," Durbin said in a statement. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, a Connecticut Democrat who is head of a House committee overseeing the FDA, has also expressed concern about the agency's monitoring of pet food.

The scare began last month, when Menu Foods of Ontario recalled more than 60 million cans of dog and cat food linked to the deaths of several pets. Menu Foods makes pet food for several companies.

The FDA found melamine, a chemical used to make plastic, in the products. Recalls spread to more than 140 brands of pet food, biscuits, treats and jerky. States are investigating dozens of deaths of pets. Whether melamine sickened the animals is unclear.

The situation has confounded pet owners, angry that a specific cause hasn't been identified and confused by unorganized recall information, rather than a unified list.

Yesterday, Dr. John Fioramonti reviewed the lists of recalled products at his Towson veterinary office to see whether a patient's vomiting may have been caused by tainted food. "If it's confusing and difficult for me, just think what it's like for the owners," Fioramonti said. The dog hadn't eaten one of the recalled foods.

Maureen Hauch, showing a dog at the Greater Fredericksburg Kennel Club show yesterday in Virginia, said the scare was "all you hear" about in the tents where dog owners wait with their pets to compete.

"Every day you get up and it's another batch of food that is recalled," said Hauch, executive director of the American Dog Owners Association. She said the government needs to test pet food more, and she supports connecting veterinarians to a nationwide alert system, as with public health officials dealing with human illnesses.

The American Veterinary Medical Association is developing a unified, comprehensive list of recalled products, said Michael San Filippo, a spokesman. It is also trying to keep its 75,000 members - about 85 percent of all veterinarians - up to date on the latest events through mass e-mails, a phone bank and alerts to state officials.

The association supports establishment of a central database for veterinarians to report and keep updated about safety scares, San Filippo said.

A national chain of animal hospitals - Banfield, the Pet Hospital, based in Portland, Ore. - has given the FDA access to its computerized records of pet visits at its 615 facilities, said Dr. Nancy Zimmerman, senior medical adviser. Banfield is also sharing with the FDA an analysis of tissue samples from pets who died recently.

The FDA found the melamine in wheat gluten, an ingredient used to thicken wet pet food. The agency says the wheat gluten came from a supplier in China, but the Chinese government said the ingredient hasn't been exported to the United States or Canada. BULLS**I The FDA doesn't know how melamine tainted the wheat gluten.
 
LARGEST PET FOOD RECALL EVER—
-A Genetic Engineered Food Disaster?
By Michael W. Fox B.Vet.Med., Ph.D., D.Sc., M.R.C.V.S.

I have received several letters from dog and cat owners thanking me for 'saving their animal's lives' because they were feeding them the kind of home-made diet that I have been advocating as a veterinarian for some years. These letters came after the largest pet food recall in the pet food industry's history.

On March 23, the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets announced that they had found 'rat poison' in contaminated wheat gluten imported from China was responsible for the suffering and deaths of an as yet uncounted numbers of cats and dogs across North America. The poison is a chemical compound called aminopterin.

Veterinary toxicologists with the ASPCA and American College of Internal Veterinary Medicine shared my concern that there may be some other food contaminant (s) in addition to the aminopterin that was sickening and killing many pets. Experts were not convinced that the finding of rat poison contamination was the end of the story.

On March 30, the FDA reported finding a widely used compound called melamine described as a chemical used in the manufacture of plastics, as a wood resin adhesive and protective, in the suspect pet foods. The FDA claimed that the melamine was the cause of an as yet uncounted number of cat and dog poisonings and deaths. The FDA could not find the rat poison, aminopterin, in the samples it analyzed. However a lab in Canada, at the University of Guelph, has confirmed the presence of rat poison.

The Associated Press cited the Environmental Protection Agency as having identified melamine as a contaminant and byproduct of several pesticides, including cryomazine. People began to question if there is also pesticide contamination of the wheat gluten. Is there a possibility of deliberate contamination, or is it the result of gross mismanagement and lack of effective food-safety and quality controls that accounts for levels of melamine reported to be as high as 6.6% by in FDA analyzed samples of the wheat gluten?

A brief internet search quickly reveals that the widely used insect growth regulator cryomazine is not only made from melamine, but it also breaks down into melamine after ingestion by an animal. Wheat gluten is wheat gluten, fit for human consumption, so the question remains, what was wrong with this gluten that it was only bought for use in pet food?

On April 3 Associated Press named the US importer as ChemNutra of Las Vegas, reporting that the company had recalled 873 tons of wheat gluten that had been shipped to three pet food makers and a single distributor who in turn supplies the pet food industry.

While Congressional hearings are now being called for by grieving pet owners, and class action suits put together, this debacle could have catastrophic consequences not only for conventional agribusiness, of which the pet food industry is a lucrative subsidiary, but also for the agricultural biotechnology industry, with its millions of acres of genetically engineered crops around the world.

I reach this conclusion, until there is evidence to the contrary, for the following reasons:

1. The wheat gluten imported from China was not for human consumption, because, I believe, it had been genetically engineered. The FDA has a wholly cavalier attitude toward feeding animals such 'frankenfoods' but places some restrictions when human consumption is involved (yet refuses appropriate food labeling).

2. The 'rat poison' aminopterin is used in molecular biology as an anti-metabolite, folate antagonist, and in genetic engineering biotechnology as a genetic marker. This could account for its presence in this imported wheat gluten.

3. The 'plastic', 'wood preservative', contaminant melamine, the parent chemical for a potent insecticide cyromazine, could well have been manufactured WITHIN the wheat plants themselves as a genetically engineered pesticide. This is much like the Bt. insecticidal poison present in most US commodity crops that go into animal feed.

4.So called 'overexpression' can occur when spliced genes that synthesize such chemicals become hyperactive inside the plant and result in potentially toxic plant tissues, lethal not just to meal worms and other crop pests, but to cats, dogs, birds, butterflies and other wildlife; and to their creators. (For details, see my book Killer Foods: What Scientists Do to Make Food Better is Not Always Best. Lyon's Press, 2004).

How else can one account for samples of pet food containing as much as 6% melamine? It was surely not mixed in such amounts when the wheat gluten was being processed, but rather was already in the wheat, along with the aminopterin genetic marker. My suspicion is that the FDA was aware that the gluten came from genetically engineered wheat that was considered safe for animal consumption. To admit that the gluten came from a genetically engineered food crop could harm the US agricultural biotechnology industry, and raise valid consumer concerns.

I could be wrong. But a greater wrong is surely for the pet food industry to use food ingredients and food and beverage industry by-products considered unfit for human consumption; to continue to do business without any adequate government oversight and inspection; and for government to give greater priority and support to agricultural biotechnology ( that requires far more food quality and safety tests and surveillance than conventional crops— all at the public's expense0—than to organic, humane, ecologically sound and safe food production.

I believe that there is evidence of gross negligence, not simply on the part of the pet food industry, but by all who are responsible for food quality and safety in the global market that is clearly dysfunctional. The Pet Food Institute should start an emergency fund to compensate all veterinary expenses incurred as a result of this—and any future—mass poisonings of people's beloved animal companions.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top