If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Reply to thread

Message

You don't understand the concept of providing evidence that proves that markets were manipulated.

Another of your many unsupported "cheap talk" opinions. You don't understand anything about this industry let alone have enough knowledge to understand the appellate decision.

Another lie from you. I don't have any ties to Tyson but I do agree with "due process" and the "presumption of innocense". Just because I don't support your packer blaming bias does not mean that I am a company advocate. I believe in truth and facts, not a compelling need to blame large corporate packers like you do.

I understand that you refuse to answer questions yet expect others to and I understand that claiming "baseless" is easier than proving it.

You don't understand nothing. You make crap up as you go. If you knew what you were talking about you could take a statement I have made and prove me wrong with the facts to the contrary. You don't have any facts to support anything so you resort to your empty meaningless little discrediting statements like this that impress you.

There was no proof that any law was broke. You are so overcome with packer blame that you have convinced yourself that it happened YET CANNOT PROVIDE THE PROOF TO BACK THAT POSITION.

You haven't corrected me on anything. All you can offer is your cheap talk little statements like this. You could't be more factually void to defend your position. If it wasn't for cheap talk, you wouldn't exist.

Until you start answering my questions, don't expect me to answer yours. This isn't your classroom to deceive.

Another damn lie!

Show everyone where I made that claim!

Watch the dance folks.................

Make it up as you go. Must really impress yourself huh?

You don't have any intellect when it comes to arguing your case. Your opinions and theories are only as good as the facts that support them. From the standpoint of supporting facts, you couldn't be more "WITHOUT".

You aren't qualified to teach kindergarten let alone lecture on the economic factors in the cattle industry.

Nobody has been corrected on more false information here than you have.

More cheap talk! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!

You'd know all about following wouldn't you?

Absorbing an insult from you is not unlike being run over by a baby buggy.

~SH~

<blockquote data-quote="Anonymous" data-source="post: 52032">You don&#039;t understand the concept of providing evidence that proves that markets were manipulated.Another of your many unsupported &quot;cheap talk&quot; opinions.&nbsp; You don&#039;t understand anything about this industry let alone have enough knowledge to understand the appellate decision.Another lie from you.&nbsp; I don&#039;t have any ties to Tyson but I do agree with &quot;due process&quot; and the &quot;presumption of innocense&quot;.&nbsp; Just because I don&#039;t support your packer blaming bias does not mean that I am a company advocate.&nbsp; I believe in truth and facts, not a compelling need to blame large corporate packers like you do.I understand that you refuse to answer questions yet expect others to and I understand that claiming &quot;baseless&quot; is easier than proving it.You don&#039;t understand nothing.&nbsp; You make crap up as you go.&nbsp; If you knew what you were talking about you could take a statement I have made and prove me wrong with the facts to the contrary.&nbsp; You don&#039;t have any facts to support anything so you resort to your empty meaningless little discrediting statements like this that impress you.There was no proof that any law was broke.&nbsp; You are so overcome with packer blame that you have convinced yourself that it happened YET CANNOT PROVIDE THE PROOF TO BACK THAT POSITION.You haven&#039;t corrected me on anything.&nbsp; All you can offer is your cheap talk little statements like this.&nbsp; You could&#039;t be more factually void to defend your position.&nbsp; If it wasn&#039;t for cheap talk, you wouldn&#039;t exist.Until you start answering my questions, don&#039;t expect me to answer yours.&nbsp; This isn&#039;t your classroom to deceive.Another damn lie!Show everyone where I made that claim!Watch the dance folks.................Make it up as you go.&nbsp; Must really impress yourself huh? You don&#039;t have any intellect when it comes to arguing your case.&nbsp; Your opinions and theories are only as good as the facts that support them.&nbsp; From the standpoint of supporting facts, you couldn&#039;t be more &quot;WITHOUT&quot;.You aren&#039;t qualified to teach kindergarten let alone lecture on the economic factors in the cattle industry.Nobody has been corrected on more false information here than you have.More cheap talk!&nbsp; ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!You&#039;d know all about following wouldn&#039;t you?Absorbing an insult from you is not unlike being run over by a baby buggy.~SH~</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 52032"] You don't understand the concept of providing evidence that proves that markets were manipulated. Another of your many unsupported "cheap talk" opinions. You don't understand anything about this industry let alone have enough knowledge to understand the appellate decision. Another lie from you. I don't have any ties to Tyson but I do agree with "due process" and the "presumption of innocense". Just because I don't support your packer blaming bias does not mean that I am a company advocate. I believe in truth and facts, not a compelling need to blame large corporate packers like you do. I understand that you refuse to answer questions yet expect others to and I understand that claiming "baseless" is easier than proving it. You don't understand nothing. You make crap up as you go. If you knew what you were talking about you could take a statement I have made and prove me wrong with the facts to the contrary. You don't have any facts to support anything so you resort to your empty meaningless little discrediting statements like this that impress you. There was no proof that any law was broke. You are so overcome with packer blame that you have convinced yourself that it happened YET CANNOT PROVIDE THE PROOF TO BACK THAT POSITION. You haven't corrected me on anything. All you can offer is your cheap talk little statements like this. You could't be more factually void to defend your position. If it wasn't for cheap talk, you wouldn't exist. Until you start answering my questions, don't expect me to answer yours. This isn't your classroom to deceive. Another damn lie! Show everyone where I made that claim! Watch the dance folks................. Make it up as you go. Must really impress yourself huh? You don't have any intellect when it comes to arguing your case. Your opinions and theories are only as good as the facts that support them. From the standpoint of supporting facts, you couldn't be more "WITHOUT". You aren't qualified to teach kindergarten let alone lecture on the economic factors in the cattle industry. Nobody has been corrected on more false information here than you have. More cheap talk! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! You'd know all about following wouldn't you? Absorbing an insult from you is not unlike being run over by a baby buggy. ~SH~ [/QUOTE]

Verification: What city in Missouri has a big arch?