• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Montana's Cornwell Ranch signs with Nature Conservancy

Faster horses

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
30,488
Location
NE WY at the foot of the Big Horn mountains
A northeastern Montana ranch considered two years ago for a Fish, Wildlife and Parks easement has instead signed a deal with The Nature Conservancy to protect 9,500 acres.

"With this easement, the land will stay valued as agriculture, so we can afford to pass it along to our kids," said Lee Cornwell in a statement.

"That's really why we're doing it, to make sure that the next generation can live this great life."

The 24,000-acre Cornwell Ranch is rich in history as well as unique in its landscape.

The area north of Glasgow is known as glaciated grasslands, prime habitat for disappearing bird species such as sage grouse and the Sprague's pipit. Sage grouse, a candidate for endangered-species protection, breed on the ranch and migrate through en route to and from Canada, the longest recorded migration route for the species. FWP has identified the area as one of its core sage grouse conservation areas.

"That area is one of the biggest intact grasslands in the Great Plains," said Brian Martin, science director for the Montana office of The Nature Conservancy. "We looked at it as a great opportunity from a wildlife perspective."

In 2008, Fish, Wildlife and Parks had proposed purchasing an easement for the entire ranch, which would have guaranteed continued public access to hunt portions of the property. Although approved by the Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission, the easement was denied by the state as too expensive. The state estimated the appraised value of the entire ranch at between $4.75 million and $5.25 million.

Once the FWP deal fell through, the Cornwells approached The Nature Conservancy and carved out the smaller, 9,500-acre easement. The nonprofit group is also working to secure an easement that would use North American Wetlands Conservation funding for another 2,000 acres of the ranch along Buggy Creek, Martin said.

"There's just a high diversity of grassland birds in that area," Martin said. "They are declining more rapidly than any other birds in North America."

Under the easement agreement, the Cornwells will be able to continue ranching but are barred from farming and industrial development — such as a wind farm — or subdividing the property, Martin said.

"I guess we're kind of freezing the land in time," Cornwell said.

"We're making sure it stays the way it was when my grandfather settled it back in 1892; we want it to stay in grass."

The ranch is next door to the Bureau of Land Management's 59,000-acre Bitter Creek Wilderness Study Area. Other wildlife found in the region and on the ranch include Baird's sparrow, chestnut-collared longspur, McCown's longspur, long-billed curlew, ferruginous hawk, lark bunting, pronghorn, mule deer, badger and swift fox.

"This easement really helps ensure that continuity of natural habitat between private and public land in that area," Martin said.
 
I don't know what is actually wriiten into their easement. The easement bought the Cornwells sometime. They have been struggling for sometime now. What they ultimately did was pushed the the ball rolling a little faster for the agenda of the World Wildlife Fund and The President on signing the Antiquities act to make this whole thing a Nat'l Monument.
Of the 5 million members of WWF only 20% are residents of the United States. This is not just a problem for Ranchers. This is not just a problem for us in Northeast Montana. The WWF and the United Nation Biodiversity Treaty and Wildlands project is call for much bigger plans. Their brochure has the time frames spelled out. If you are in Canada you also need to be concerned. For one the expansion of the Grassland area is about to expand.
 
Horseless said:
I don't know what is actually wriiten into their easement. The easement bought the Cornwells sometime. They have been struggling for sometime now. What they ultimately did was pushed the the ball rolling a little faster for the agenda of the World Wildlife Fund and The President on signing the Antiquities act to make this whole thing a Nat'l Monument.
Of the 5 million members of WWF only 20% are residents of the United States. This is not just a problem for Ranchers. This is not just a problem for us in Northeast Montana. The WWF and the United Nation Biodiversity Treaty and Wildlands project is call for much bigger plans. Their brochure has the time frames spelled out. If you are in Canada you also need to be concerned. For one the expansion of the Grassland area is about to expand.

This ranch we lease has had an easement through Montana Land Reliance for many years. We've had a good relationship with these people...
 
Is there any Federal land grazing allotments with that land?
What does it say about having buffalo on the land?
I believe in our area, that is being threatened with a Nat'l monument status or the establishment of wild bison, that an easement like Cornwells has added more fuel to the envirnomental groups. I can easily see the American Prairie Foundation (which is the World Wildlife Fund) buying land next to Cornwells and the Bittercreek study area. If they can get a wild bison herd established and declared wild, the land owners must share their land with the bison, just as if they were deer. If you ended up with 100 head of buffalo on your place, you would need to decrease your cattle numbers accordingly. People need to start waking up. These groups including federal agencies have laid all the ground work for years as we have been sleeping. They are in the final phases of implementing them and now they have the adminstration to get it done.
But don't get me started. This is not the end of the story.
Check out Facebook group "property rights and bison"
 
My point is that it is no guarantee that you will be able to continue to ranch on it. It always sounds good on the surface, but the devil is in the details. Can't subdivide, but what about always being able to have cattle, without the invasion of bison.
FWP will use this to their advantage also.
 
Maybe these folks didn't or don't want to ranch in the long term.....

Why are some of you irritated about these people have done with their OWN land?

It's their land/ranch...to do with as they please.....you'd do as you pleased if/when faced with the decision.


If they are happy with their choices....I'm happy for them.
 
I am on a Ag land trust board, basily we require no managment plan, we do require the ranch to keep up all water rights.The buffalo issue I can't anwser... maybe just fence them out, That be ok on our easments
 
This is in a county that is bigger than the state of Delaware- and has 8,000 people... And pretty remote from the only incorporated town, which has a population of about 3500-- so I don't think subdivision was a major problem for quite some time in the future...Most new folks are looking for acreage 5 miles from town....

It appears to me that while the current owner gets a substantial payment for entering into the easement--one thing these conservation easements do do is lower the future value of the land because of development restrictions and having someone overseeing your land forever--so that it lowers the value if it is ever allowed to be transferred to another rancher/producer-- but because of the wildlife, and nondevelopment requirements makes the land worth that much more to the Greeny Weeny and Save the Buffalo groups like Horseless said...

Don't get me wrong- I think in some of the more heavy populated areas the conservation easements probably helped to save some ranch lands from being developed- but I'm not sure it isn't working in reverse in some other areas- altho also like Horseless said- its keeping some operations from going under for the present time anyway....
 
it just a tool , not everybody needs it but you or your neighbor just might, to retire some debit, estate planing, or even to keep the developers off your back. Remember if you neighbor put on on his land it raise the value of your, and if you want to but his later it a lot cheap being whole with a easment then trying to put it back as 40s :D
 
Another question that jumps in my mind- is how this conservation easement will effect the proposed pipeline coming down from Canada that is supposed to come thru this area starting next year...... :???: I'll have to talk to one of the Cornwells and see...Not sure which parts they got in their easement- altho they are trying to get it all in I think...

I know the plan the Greenies have had on the books for years would definitely stop the pipeline..

Horseless sent me this map of the proposed areas they want which would take almost all of two of the biggest counties in Montana- plus some in Canada:

BuffaloCommons.jpg
 
In Canada an Easement won't stop energy development, It might be able to impose some environmental concerns and mitigation but I don't think it will stop it.
What about Eminent Domain in the US?
 
Big Muddy rancher said:
In Canada an Easement won't stop energy development, It might be able to impose some environmental concerns and mitigation but I don't think it will stop it.
What about Eminent Domain in the US?

This is what I found:

As isthe case with any property interest, a conservation easement may be taken by eminent domain (andthereby extinguished) whenthe public value ofthe proposed project exceeds that ofthe conservation interest being protected bythe easement.
 
Was visiting with a rancher in South Phillips County, (where their neighbors are the Nature Conservancy and The American Prairie Foundation) who told me that the BLM has filed for 2 water rights on each reservoir. I am assuming on BLM managed property, the first one is 98% for wildlife and the other 2% for livestock. The Ranchers are fighting it, but if the BLM wins, look like bison are in and cattle are out. Just what the TNC and APF want, if they can get wild buffalo established on Federal lands, they don't have to buy more land or easements. Wild bison will have right to roam any where, just like deer.
Fish, Wildlife and Parks are having meetings about free roaming bison next week in Circle Montana and Belgrade Montana.
Yellowstone National Park had meetings in Bozeman, Helena and Malta, MT over a week ago.
This is not just a coincidence.
This easment on the Cornwells is all part of their plan to get bison on the prairies.
 
Horseless- have you asked any of the NCBA leadership what they know of what is happening-- or are they again just pawns like the Packers use them :???: :(

Unique Partnership Promotes Conservation through Ranching

A group of ranching and conservation organizations have formed a broad-based coalition to enhance ranching practices that consider important conservation issues throughout the West.

A group of respected ranching and conservation organizations have come together to form a unique broad based coalition to enhance ranching practices that consider important conservation issues throughout the West. The Coalition for Conservation through Ranching is a new multi-stakeholder partnership between national conservation-minded groups that share an interest in promoting open space for ranching and healthy landscapes. The recently signed agreement marks the beginning of the unique relationship. Steering committee members of the coalition include the Public Lands Council (PLC), the National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA), National Association of Conservation Districts (NACD), Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), Family Farm Alliance (FFA) and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). Other organizations that have joined the coalition at this time are the American Farmland Trust, the American Forage and Grassland Council, the California Farm Bureau Federation, the Society for Rangeland Management, the Wild Sheep Foundation, and the Wilderness Society. The Bureau of Land Management serves as an advisor to the group.
 
With the World Wildllife Fund in this group, I would have absolutely no trust in what this partnership could accomplish. They (WWF) definetly talk out of both sides of the their mouths. Why does a group of foreign investors have an interest in helping ranching in the United States? They don't, period.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top