If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Reply to thread

Message

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Reynnells, Richard" <RREYNNELLS@nifa.usda.gov>
Date: April 25, 2011 5:29:56 AM PDT
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: FW: Wild Horse Decision Called Precedent-Setting

fyi

From:
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 10:47 AM
To:

Subject: Wild Horse Decision Called Precedent-Setting

http://www.northernag.net/AGNews/tabid/171/articleType/ArticleView/artic
leId/3328/Wild-Horse-Decision-Called-Precedent-Setting.aspx

Wild Horse Decision Called Precedent-Setting
<http://www.northernag.net/AGNews/tabid/171/articleType/ArticleView/arti
cleId/3328/Wild-Horse-Decision-Called-Precedent-Setting.aspx>

general admin
<http://www.northernag.net/AGNews/tabid/171/articleType/AuthorView/autho
rID/85/nanadmin.aspx> posted on April 21, 2011 08:18 :: 56 Views

By SCOTT SONNER Associated Press
RENO, Nev.-Horse protection advocates claimed a rare legal victory in
their larger effort to end federal roundups of free-roaming mustangs on
public lands in the West on Wednesday when a judge denied the
government's motion to dismiss their lawsuit alleging the gathers are
illegal.
U.S. District Judge Morrison England Jr. ruled in Sacramento that In
Defense of Animals and others can move forward with their lawsuit
accusing the U.S. Bureau of Land Management of violating laws protecting
the animals on the range when they gathered more than 1,700 horses and
burros near the California-Nevada line last year.
As it has in similar cases in the past, BLM argued the suit is moot and
should be dismissed because the last of the horses in the Twin Peaks
horse management area were removed from the range in September.
But in what the horse advocates say is a precedent-setting decision, the
judge ruled the case is not moot because "effective relief can still be
granted" if the plaintiffs prove BLM violated the National Environmental
Policy Act or the Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act.
"Assuming each of the plaintiffs allegations are true, this court could
conceivably provide relief in the form of an order returning all animals
in short-term and long-term holding facilities to either Twin Peaks or
the West until all requirements of NEPA are met," Morrison said.
"Further, this court could issue an order compelling (BLM) to fully
comply with
NEPA requirements for all future gathers," he wrote.
The agency maintains the roundups are necessary to thin overpopulated
herds causing ecological damage to the rangeland that serves as critical
habitat for numerous species across much of the West, including sage
grouse.
Morrison earlier denied the horse advocates' bid for a temporarily
restraining order to block the roundup before it began last fall in the
extreme northeast corner of California. The critics said in their
lawsuit the gather was illegal partly because there has been no
discussion or consideration of removing some of the 10,000-plus cattle
and sheep currently grazing on the Twin Peaks HMA.
An appeal of that ruling still is pending before the 9th Circuit Court
of Appeals in San Francisco.
But Morrison indicated in his ruling Wednesday the question of whether
the overall lawsuit challenging the legality of the roundups is separate
from the part of the lawsuit that sought to specifically block the Twin
Peaks gather.
Eric Kleiman, research director for the San Francisco-based In Defense
of Animals, said it means that rather than have the case dismissed on
"technicalities," they will for the first time have a chance to address
the merits of their arguments that the BLM has no legal right to remove
the horses from their natural, native habitat on the range.
"This is a groundbreaking legal decision that could lead to America's
wild horses finally having their day in court," he said.
"It's actually rather shocking," added Rachel Fazio, a lawyer for the
plaintiffs who also include the Dreamcatcher Wild Horse and Burro
Sanctuary. "Pretty much every other time the courts have said it is
moot."
BLM officials in Reno and Washington, D.C., did not immediately respond
to requests for comment.
Agency officials said earlier this year that an estimated 33,000 wild
horses roam freely in 10 Western states, about half of those in Nevada.
An additional 36,000 horses are cared for in government-funded holding
facilities. BLM maintains that the horse population would double every
four years if not for the roundup of about 10,000 annually.

Source: The Associated Press <http://www.ap.org/>
Posted by Haylie Shipp

<blockquote data-quote="OldDog/NewTricks" data-source="post: 517982" data-attributes="member: 443">Begin forwarded message:From: &quot;Reynnells, Richard&quot; &lt;RREYNNELLS@nifa.usda.gov&gt;Date: April 25, 2011 5:29:56 AM PDTTo: undisclosed-recipients:;Subject: FW: Wild Horse Decision Called Precedent-SettingfyiFrom: Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 10:47 AMTo: Subject: Wild Horse Decision Called Precedent-Settinghttp://www.northernag.net/AGNews/tabid/171/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/3328/Wild-Horse-Decision-Called-Precedent-Setting.aspxWild Horse Decision Called Precedent-Setting&lt;http://www.northernag.net/AGNews/tabid/171/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/3328/Wild-Horse-Decision-Called-Precedent-Setting.aspx&gt; general admin&lt;http://www.northernag.net/AGNews/tabid/171/articleType/AuthorView/authorID/85/nanadmin.aspx&gt;&nbsp; posted on April 21, 2011 08:18 :: 56 Views By SCOTT SONNER Associated PressRENO, Nev.-Horse protection advocates claimed a rare legal victory intheir larger effort to end federal roundups of free-roaming mustangs onpublic lands in the West on Wednesday when a judge denied thegovernment&#039;s motion to dismiss their lawsuit alleging the gathers areillegal.U.S. District Judge Morrison England Jr. ruled in Sacramento that InDefense of Animals and others can move forward with their lawsuitaccusing the U.S. Bureau of Land Management of violating laws protectingthe animals on the range when they gathered more than 1,700 horses andburros near the California-Nevada line last year.As it has in similar cases in the past, BLM argued the suit is moot andshould be dismissed because the last of the horses in the Twin Peakshorse management area were removed from the range in September.But in what the horse advocates say is a precedent-setting decision, thejudge ruled the case is not moot because &quot;effective relief can still begranted&quot; if the plaintiffs prove BLM violated the National EnvironmentalPolicy Act or the Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act.&quot;Assuming each of the plaintiffs allegations are true, this court couldconceivably provide relief in the form of an order returning all animalsin short-term and long-term holding facilities to either Twin Peaks orthe West until all requirements of NEPA are met,&quot; Morrison said.&quot;Further, this court could issue an order compelling (BLM) to fullycomply withNEPA requirements for all future gathers,&quot; he wrote. The agency maintains the roundups are necessary to thin overpopulatedherds causing ecological damage to the rangeland that serves as criticalhabitat for numerous species across much of the West, including sagegrouse.Morrison earlier denied the horse advocates&#039; bid for a temporarilyrestraining order to block the roundup before it began last fall in theextreme northeast corner of California. The critics said in theirlawsuit the gather was illegal partly because there has been nodiscussion or consideration of removing some of the 10,000-plus cattleand sheep currently grazing on the Twin Peaks HMA.An appeal of that ruling still is pending before the 9th Circuit Courtof Appeals in San Francisco.But Morrison indicated in his ruling Wednesday the question of whetherthe overall lawsuit challenging the legality of the roundups is separatefrom the part of the lawsuit that sought to specifically block the TwinPeaks gather.Eric Kleiman, research director for the San Francisco-based In Defenseof Animals, said it means that rather than have the case dismissed on&quot;technicalities,&quot; they will for the first time have a chance to addressthe merits of their arguments that the BLM has no legal right to removethe horses from their natural, native habitat on the range.&quot;This is a groundbreaking legal decision that could lead to America&#039;swild horses finally having their day in court,&quot; he said.&quot;It&#039;s actually rather shocking,&quot; added Rachel Fazio, a lawyer for theplaintiffs who also include the Dreamcatcher Wild Horse and BurroSanctuary. &quot;Pretty much every other time the courts have said it ismoot.&quot;BLM officials in Reno and Washington, D.C., did not immediately respondto requests for comment.Agency officials said earlier this year that an estimated 33,000 wildhorses roam freely in 10 Western states, about half of those in Nevada.An additional 36,000 horses are cared for in government-funded holdingfacilities. BLM maintains that the horse population would double everyfour years if not for the roundup of about 10,000 annually.Source:&nbsp; The Associated Press &lt;http://www.ap.org/&gt; Posted by Haylie Shipp</blockquote>

[QUOTE="OldDog/NewTricks, post: 517982, member: 443"] Begin forwarded message: From: "Reynnells, Richard" <RREYNNELLS@nifa.usda.gov> Date: April 25, 2011 5:29:56 AM PDT To: undisclosed-recipients:; Subject: FW: Wild Horse Decision Called Precedent-Setting fyi From: Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 10:47 AM To: Subject: Wild Horse Decision Called Precedent-Setting http://www.northernag.net/AGNews/tabid/171/articleType/ArticleView/artic leId/3328/Wild-Horse-Decision-Called-Precedent-Setting.aspx Wild Horse Decision Called Precedent-Setting <http://www.northernag.net/AGNews/tabid/171/articleType/ArticleView/arti cleId/3328/Wild-Horse-Decision-Called-Precedent-Setting.aspx> general admin <http://www.northernag.net/AGNews/tabid/171/articleType/AuthorView/autho rID/85/nanadmin.aspx> posted on April 21, 2011 08:18 :: 56 Views By SCOTT SONNER Associated Press RENO, Nev.-Horse protection advocates claimed a rare legal victory in their larger effort to end federal roundups of free-roaming mustangs on public lands in the West on Wednesday when a judge denied the government's motion to dismiss their lawsuit alleging the gathers are illegal. U.S. District Judge Morrison England Jr. ruled in Sacramento that In Defense of Animals and others can move forward with their lawsuit accusing the U.S. Bureau of Land Management of violating laws protecting the animals on the range when they gathered more than 1,700 horses and burros near the California-Nevada line last year. As it has in similar cases in the past, BLM argued the suit is moot and should be dismissed because the last of the horses in the Twin Peaks horse management area were removed from the range in September. But in what the horse advocates say is a precedent-setting decision, the judge ruled the case is not moot because "effective relief can still be granted" if the plaintiffs prove BLM violated the National Environmental Policy Act or the Wild and Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act. "Assuming each of the plaintiffs allegations are true, this court could conceivably provide relief in the form of an order returning all animals in short-term and long-term holding facilities to either Twin Peaks or the West until all requirements of NEPA are met," Morrison said. "Further, this court could issue an order compelling (BLM) to fully comply with NEPA requirements for all future gathers," he wrote. The agency maintains the roundups are necessary to thin overpopulated herds causing ecological damage to the rangeland that serves as critical habitat for numerous species across much of the West, including sage grouse. Morrison earlier denied the horse advocates' bid for a temporarily restraining order to block the roundup before it began last fall in the extreme northeast corner of California. The critics said in their lawsuit the gather was illegal partly because there has been no discussion or consideration of removing some of the 10,000-plus cattle and sheep currently grazing on the Twin Peaks HMA. An appeal of that ruling still is pending before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. But Morrison indicated in his ruling Wednesday the question of whether the overall lawsuit challenging the legality of the roundups is separate from the part of the lawsuit that sought to specifically block the Twin Peaks gather. Eric Kleiman, research director for the San Francisco-based In Defense of Animals, said it means that rather than have the case dismissed on "technicalities," they will for the first time have a chance to address the merits of their arguments that the BLM has no legal right to remove the horses from their natural, native habitat on the range. "This is a groundbreaking legal decision that could lead to America's wild horses finally having their day in court," he said. "It's actually rather shocking," added Rachel Fazio, a lawyer for the plaintiffs who also include the Dreamcatcher Wild Horse and Burro Sanctuary. "Pretty much every other time the courts have said it is moot." BLM officials in Reno and Washington, D.C., did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Agency officials said earlier this year that an estimated 33,000 wild horses roam freely in 10 Western states, about half of those in Nevada. An additional 36,000 horses are cared for in government-funded holding facilities. BLM maintains that the horse population would double every four years if not for the roundup of about 10,000 annually. Source: The Associated Press <http://www.ap.org/> Posted by Haylie Shipp [/QUOTE]

Verification: What animal is usually the product of a ranch?