OK, fedup2, I will reconsider your post. Was it, or wasn't it a "political statement" when you commented on NCBA history of support in writing the P&S Act, then added: "Why are some from this org. against enforcing the laws they helped write?" Isn't that industry politics? And which NCBA members have you heard make that comment? I know of none who want laws ignored. We work to change laws that no longer serve cattle producers well. By asking that question, weren't you making that charge or claim against NCBA members, yet providing no names or press statement to corroborate it? Maybe you believe your question is innocent, I'm not so sure, until you tell us your basis for your comment/question.

Econ, when you lie that "NCBA hasn't given you their position yet", it indicates you are willing to lie about other things as well. Why should anyone believe you at all?

OT, the same apples to your "back rooms and under the table" comment, among others. Your ridiculous trash talk about NCBA all too predictable. If you are attempting to build up your Rcalf outfit by tearing down NCBA......you must not have much in the way of results for your outfit to talk about.

BTW, Mike, aren't political "kickbacks" illegal? How do you define the difference between "kickbacks" and campaign contributions? Or do you believe there is no difference? How are good people supposed to help good candidates get elected if not via campaign contributions?

MRJ