• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Reply to thread

mike posts about gary weber is very true. he cares nothing about keeping the BSE/TSE agent out of the USA. he only cares about the bottom dollar.

this has been proven time and time again over the years.


a very fine example below;



NCBA in short (lie some more)



snip...


Summary

The NCBA has and remains completely dedicated to following a science and

risk analysis based

program to prevent the introduction, amplification and spread of BSE.

However, at this time,

more than 15 years of action, information and analysis, and in particular

data from the expanded

BSE surveillance program indicate that no data exists to support the FDA

altering the existing

feed regulations.


snip...



http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/02n0273/02n-0273-c000500-01-vol40.pdf




bozo's like the head of the NCBA are exactly why we are in this mess. ...




here is the big mac attack on the USDA et al



http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/02n0273/02n-0273_emc-000134-02.pdf




AND this old one i forgot to post from the 7 scientists (AN INTERESTING

VERSION, you might want to download this one...TSS)



http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/02n0273/02n-0273-EC244-Attach-1.pdf



and how oblivious can some of these folks be ;



Chairman: B. D. Meador Members: Billie Hurt

Vice-Chainnan: Frank Smith Tommy Long

Secretary: Randy Harston William McClure

Treasurer:: Maxie Brown Dist. A&. Sec.: Linda Smith


snip...


I feel there is no need for additional feed restrictions based on current

compliance. The current nmrinant to ruminant

feed ban created in 1997 has been in force longer than most living animals

and within two years will have survived all

living cattle. The current USSDA Surveillance Program clearly shows we do

not have a BSE risk to the United States

cattle populations and support the data of the Harvard Risk Analysis Study.

The FDA must maintain its regulatory

decisions based on science, not political or international trade influence


snip...



http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/02n0273/02n-0273-c000523-vol40.pdf




they have no idea, or they are bought and paid for by your local cattle

dealers/buyers/feeders/packers etc. etc.




oblivious members of USA congress on mad cow, one of the reasons the agent

continues to spread ;



http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/02n0273/02n-0273-c000518-01-vol40.pdf





brain dead feeders, want brain dead consumers



American Feed Indusuy Association

Comments to FDA on Docket 2002N-0273

December 19,2005

192 1 TO 13018276870 rj. 04,'04

4

concerns as are scientiIically justified through previous actions banning

the use of SRMs and

downers in the food supply and related products.


In summary, AFIA generally supports FDA's proposed rule, but believes the

proposal

should be amended to allow in animal feed brains and spinal cords from dead

and nonambulatory

cattle less than 30 month of age.


FDA should pursue testing methodologies to detect

B/SC in feed. The rendering industry should be required to keep additional

records, and

rendering industry customers shouId not have a duplicative recordkeeping

burden. FDA and

other federal agencies, in concert with state and industry interests, must

address and develop

practical and responsible alternatives and funding for disposal of

additional carcasses and SRM

material produced under this proposal.

AFL4 appreciates the opportunity to offer these comments.

Sincerely,

Richard Sellers

Vice President, Feed Control & Nutrition

American Feed Industry Association

1501 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100

Arlington, VA 22209

703/524-0810



http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/02n0273/02n-0273-c000482-vol40.pdf





Darling International


snip...


Darling supports science-based rulemaking to address animal health issues.

Based on results of the enhanced BSE surveillance program administered by

APHIS, however, BSE is not an animal health issue in the United States and

additional safeguards, such as those proposed, are not necessary to further

protect animal health. ...


snip...



http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/02n0273/02n-0273-c000462-01-vol39.pdf




TAKE THIS TO THE BANK, this will come back to haunt them;




North American Spray Dried Blood and Plasma Producers

Division of Dockets Management

(HFA-305)

Food and Drug Administration

5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061

Rockville, MD 20852

Response to Docket No. 2002N-0273, Proposed Rule Substances Prohibited From

Use in Animal

Food or Feed

Executive Summary

The North American Spray Dried Blood and Plasma Producers Association agrees

with the

conclusion of the FDA that there is no scientific evidence to suggest that

BSE infectivity is

present in bovine blood. Banning the use of bovine blood or blood fractions

in ruminant

rations will not reduce the risk of exposure of humans or animals to BSE

infectivity. Animal

health will be compromised if the use of bovine blood or blood proteins in

ruminant feeds is

restricted..........


snip...



http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/02n0273/02N-0273-EC202-Attach-1.pdf




TSS


What city in Missouri has a big arch?
Back
Top