What I'm saying, and what the law is intended, is that beef be HONESTLY labeled as ACCURATELY as possible.  If you've got beef from an animal that spent 100% of it's life in the US, an honest and accurate label would reflect that.  Same for a Canadian animal, Mexican, Australian, etc.....   I don't know why I'm explaining this to when we both know what the lawmakers were intending and we both know that the packers are playing Clinton lawyer games.  Why are you defending horseshit maneuvers designed to circumvent law and continue a practice of playing Canadian and US producers against themselves to keep cattle prices down?

 

How can I be a protectionist when I'm calling for the same treatment, the same labeling requirements for US and imports alike?