Still no straight answer on recourse....

Still no straight answer on who "we" was on your lumber analogy....

No I'm not admitting that R-CALF represents the minority! :lol:    What orginization represents the majority with the qualifications you presented?  I've asked that question before....

Agman, "Are you now in agreement with my statements that Daubert hearings to qualify an expert witness differ from cross exam?"

It seems that I posted in what I thought was plain English about Daubert.  If would take the time to re-read my postings again, you'll find that I never did disagree with you on this point.

I doubt the jury was sleeping, Agman, and I'll bet a tidy sum that they were there.  I find it strange that 12 of 12 "got it wrong".  I guess it was just a mass nap.   If that is your best explainations for not getting the "correct" verdict...

Sure, juries get it wrong - same as judges.  Who is going to dispute that?