If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Reply to thread

Message

So now you are taking credit for the honesty and fair play of the Canadian cattle industry are you? If the CFIA hadn't found and told the USDA about the OTM animal you would have never known. The Canadian industry wants to insure that no other pregnant heifers enter the US, because it is our credibility that is at stake but you take credit for that too. :roll: I guess when the OIE said in their report "the approach to sharing of information and communication demonstrated by Canada is a model to be emulated" when BSE was found in Canada, has something to do with the heat R-CALF was putting on us too right Oldtimer. :roll: Face it Oldtimer Canada has been honest from day one, we are honest inspite of the raff of R-CALF on our industry. I would have to say the credibility of the Canadian cattle industry means more to us than R-CALF's credibility means to the likes of you. AS we have told the truth at great cost to our industry. We are also honestly working to solve the problems that arise, so our Export markets, those open and those we want to open, know they can trust what we say. You R-CALFers take credit for something that has nothing to do with you and you lie knowing the facts will prove you wrong but not before you inflict a little more damage to the industry. How can you flip flop on so much and give a da** about your credibility?

By the way Oldtimer this is what we hear about your 50 day rule. this was part of an industry email we recieved Thursday.

No rule yet just and idea being explored.
Gee how does information get taken out of context. maybe it was like the time Leo said that "Canada has a chronic problem with their Meat and Bone Meal (MBM) feed ban and that it is ineffective" because , "Canada's feed ban is not adequately enforced. News reports originating in Canada indicated that as much as 70% of cattle feed samples tested contained unauthorized animal parts, suggesting that Canada has not adequately enforced its feed bans". But only to have it come out the unauthorized animal parts were rodents and small animals and birds that were ran through the combines in the fall. :roll:

<blockquote data-quote="Tam" data-source="post: 45391" data-attributes="member: 25">So now you are taking credit for the honesty and fair play of the Canadian cattle industry are you? If the CFIA hadn&#039;t found and told the USDA about the OTM animal you would have never known.&nbsp; The Canadian industry&nbsp; wants to insure that no other pregnant heifers enter the US, because it is our credibility that is at stake but you take credit for that too.&nbsp; :roll: I guess when the OIE said in their report &quot;the approach to sharing of information and communication demonstrated by Canada is a model to be emulated&quot;&nbsp; when BSE was found in Canada, has something to do with the heat R-CALF was putting on us too right Oldtimer.&nbsp; :roll:&nbsp; Face it Oldtimer Canada has been honest from day one,&nbsp; we are&nbsp; honest&nbsp; inspite of the raff of R-CALF on our industry. I would have to say the credibility of&nbsp; the Canadian cattle industry means more to us than R-CALF&#039;s credibility means to the likes of you. AS we have&nbsp; told&nbsp; the truth at great cost to our industry. We are also&nbsp; honestly working&nbsp; to solve the problems that arise, so our Export markets,&nbsp; those open and those we want to open, know they can trust what we say.&nbsp;&nbsp; You R-CALFers take credit for something that has nothing to do with you and you&nbsp;&nbsp; lie knowing the facts will prove you wrong but not before you inflict a little more damage to the industry. How can you flip flop on so much and give a da** about your credibility? By the way Oldtimer this is what we hear about your 50 day rule. this was part of an industry email we recieved Thursday. &nbsp;No rule yet just and idea being explored. Gee how does information get taken out of context. maybe it was like the time Leo said that &quot;Canada has a chronic problem with their Meat and Bone Meal (MBM) feed ban and that it is ineffective&quot; because , &quot;Canada&#039;s feed ban is not adequately enforced. News reports originating in Canada indicated that as much as 70% of cattle feed samples tested contained unauthorized animal parts, suggesting that Canada has not adequately enforced its feed bans&quot;.&nbsp; But only to have it come out the unauthorized animal parts were rodents and small animals and birds that were ran through the combines in the fall.&nbsp; :roll:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tam, post: 45391, member: 25"] So now you are taking credit for the honesty and fair play of the Canadian cattle industry are you? If the CFIA hadn't found and told the USDA about the OTM animal you would have never known. The Canadian industry wants to insure that no other pregnant heifers enter the US, because it is our credibility that is at stake but you take credit for that too. :roll: I guess when the OIE said in their report "the approach to sharing of information and communication demonstrated by Canada is a model to be emulated" when BSE was found in Canada, has something to do with the heat R-CALF was putting on us too right Oldtimer. :roll: Face it Oldtimer Canada has been honest from day one, we are honest inspite of the raff of R-CALF on our industry. I would have to say the credibility of the Canadian cattle industry means more to us than R-CALF's credibility means to the likes of you. AS we have told the truth at great cost to our industry. We are also honestly working to solve the problems that arise, so our Export markets, those open and those we want to open, know they can trust what we say. You R-CALFers take credit for something that has nothing to do with you and you lie knowing the facts will prove you wrong but not before you inflict a little more damage to the industry. How can you flip flop on so much and give a da** about your credibility? By the way Oldtimer this is what we hear about your 50 day rule. this was part of an industry email we recieved Thursday. No rule yet just and idea being explored. Gee how does information get taken out of context. maybe it was like the time Leo said that "Canada has a chronic problem with their Meat and Bone Meal (MBM) feed ban and that it is ineffective" because , “Canada’s feed ban is not adequately enforced. News reports originating in Canada indicated that as much as 70% of cattle feed samples tested contained unauthorized animal parts, suggesting that Canada has not adequately enforced its feed bans”. But only to have it come out the unauthorized animal parts were rodents and small animals and birds that were ran through the combines in the fall. :roll: [/QUOTE]

Verification: What animal is usually the product of a ranch?