If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Reply to thread

Message

Sandman,

How could I be making up facts about Pasco and Boise's losses surpassing Lakeside's profits when Tyson's head of cattle procurement acknowledged the fact and the NW plants were running at 35% of capacity. Your too damn ignorant to even understand what that means to the efficiency of a packing plant.

Did you offer anything to contradict the information I presented?

HELL NO!

Did you call any Tyson representative to confirm either way?

HELL NO!

YOU DON'T WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH BECAUSE YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!

ALL YOU EVER DO IS CREATE THE "ILLUSION" OF BEING RIGHT!

All you have is your feeble attempts to discredit whatever doesn't support your blaming bias but NOT ONCE HAVE YOU EVER BROUGHT ANYTHING RELEVANT TO THE TABLE TO SUPPORT YOUR POSITION.

NOT ONCE!

All you can do is disagree.

Just like I am right about the Tyson profit/loss issue, Creekstone was planning to rely heavily on Canadian cattle to ship to Japan. I never said "EXCLUSIVELY", I said "primary source".

If you can prove otherwise, bring it but that is what I read. It was pointed out to me because of R-CULT's support for Creekstone yet Creekstone had planned to rely heavily on Canadian imports.

~SH~

<blockquote data-quote="Anonymous" data-source="post: 46481">Sandman,How could I be making up facts about Pasco and Boise&#039;s losses surpassing Lakeside&#039;s profits when Tyson&#039;s head of cattle procurement acknowledged the fact and the NW plants were running at 35% of capacity.&nbsp; Your too damn ignorant to even understand what that means to the efficiency of a packing plant.Did you offer anything to contradict the information I presented?HELL NO!Did you call any Tyson representative to confirm either way?HELL NO!&nbsp; YOU DON&#039;T WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH BECAUSE YOU CAN&#039;T HANDLE THE TRUTH!ALL YOU EVER DO IS CREATE THE &quot;ILLUSION&quot; OF BEING RIGHT!All you have is your feeble attempts to discredit whatever doesn&#039;t support your blaming bias but NOT ONCE HAVE YOU EVER BROUGHT ANYTHING RELEVANT TO THE TABLE TO SUPPORT YOUR POSITION.NOT ONCE!All you can do is disagree.Just like I am right about the Tyson profit/loss issue, Creekstone was planning to rely heavily on Canadian cattle to ship to Japan.&nbsp; I never said &quot;EXCLUSIVELY&quot;, I said &quot;primary source&quot;. If you can prove otherwise, bring it but that is what I read.&nbsp; It was pointed out to me because of R-CULT&#039;s support for Creekstone yet Creekstone had planned to rely heavily on Canadian imports.~SH~</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 46481"] Sandman, How could I be making up facts about Pasco and Boise's losses surpassing Lakeside's profits when Tyson's head of cattle procurement acknowledged the fact and the NW plants were running at 35% of capacity. Your too damn ignorant to even understand what that means to the efficiency of a packing plant. Did you offer anything to contradict the information I presented? HELL NO! Did you call any Tyson representative to confirm either way? HELL NO! YOU DON'T WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH BECAUSE YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH! ALL YOU EVER DO IS CREATE THE "ILLUSION" OF BEING RIGHT! All you have is your feeble attempts to discredit whatever doesn't support your blaming bias but NOT ONCE HAVE YOU EVER BROUGHT ANYTHING RELEVANT TO THE TABLE TO SUPPORT YOUR POSITION. NOT ONCE! All you can do is disagree. Just like I am right about the Tyson profit/loss issue, Creekstone was planning to rely heavily on Canadian cattle to ship to Japan. I never said "EXCLUSIVELY", I said "primary source". If you can prove otherwise, bring it but that is what I read. It was pointed out to me because of R-CULT's support for Creekstone yet Creekstone had planned to rely heavily on Canadian imports. ~SH~ [/QUOTE]

Verification: What animal is usually the product of a ranch?