• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Sour Grapes

Tap

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Messages
1,258
Location
anyplace you find me
Sounds like a typical person that moves in an area, and doesn't like the way thing are going there.

Forest Access Dispute: Starr Valley man jailed in battle over easement


By MARIANNE KOBAK - Staff Writer
Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:58 PM PDT



ELKO — A brief stint in jail may convince a Starr Valley man to allow his neighbors access to their easement, which leads to the Humboldt National Forest. Then again, it might not.

Former U.S. Bureau of Land Management district manager Jim Currivan was booked into the Elko County Jail Monday to serve a 10-day sentence.

Currivan and his wife, Theresa, purchased 3,500 acres in 1995, knowing their neighbors had legal easements that gave them access to the forest. The Currivans claimed in a lawsuit their neighbors abused the easements by allowing several other people to use them and by littering and destroying habitat while crossing their property.

In his 2003 decision, District Judge Dan Papez of Nevada's 7th Judicial District said Currivan "intentionally and unreasonably interfered with the use" of the easement and engaged in "a civil conspiracy to the detriment of the defendants' rights to use and enjoy the easement."

Papez issued a permanent injunction against the Currivans but they have reportedly continued to interfere with their neighbor's access.

Senior District Judge Norman Robison of Gardnerville ruled Friday the Currivans were in contempt of court.


Jim Currivan was ordered to pay $500 and to serve 25 days in jail. Fifteen days were suspended, so long as there are no future violations. Theresa Currivan was ordered to pay a $500 fine and to serve 25 days in jail but her sentence was suspended.

Robison also said the couple has 60 days to complete the installation of gates at the three locations where gates are not presently installed and to comply with Papez's findings.

"We have these easement rights and they have tried to steal them from us in every shape or form," said Mike Gerber, one of the Currivans' neighbors.

The Currivans were unavailable for comment.



This case had one of the largest bonds attached to it in the history of the county, according to Elko County Treasurer Ceasar Salicchi.

Property owners who appeal a land case court decision must post a bond. The court determines the amount and the Currivans had to post $237,000, a portion of which was disbursed to the plaintiffs when they prevailed at trial.

"This is the largest I've ever seen," Salicchi said.

Such bonds are "not common," but they're not exactly rare, either. This is because property law is well established, having gone back to England's common law prior to the colonies.
 
There have been a lot of easment problems in areas where people move in. North of Buffalo, Wyoming there is an old established ranch (one of many). Some folks from California bought an adjoining property knowing there was an access problem. They wanted to put a road through the old ranch property, which of course, belonged to someone else. They took them to court, caused the old folks a lot of grief, time and money. I'm not sure of the outcome, but I don't think the 'want to' people prevailed...
but all it takes is someone who wants to cause a problem.

This same thing happened around Story and Ft. Phil Kearney.
Some out of staters wanted a road made through there so it would be
more convenient for them to get to their property.

We need to stand behind every private property right issue that comes up.
 
:roll: We have a few folks that have moved in here, that seem to like the way things are, enough to move here........but once here, they want to change everything to be like it was where they came from! :? If they liked it so well, why didn't they just stay there to begin with? This is one of our major gripes about getting so many new "neighbors"...........and they aren't very neighborly at all......... :evil: :mad: :x
 
Ranchy said:
:roll: We have a few folks that have moved in here, that seem to like the way things are, enough to move here........but once here, they want to change everything to be like it was where they came from! :? If they liked it so well, why didn't they just stay there to begin with? This is one of our major gripes about getting so many new "neighbors"...........and they aren't very neighborly at all......... :evil: :mad: :x
There are a few words (OTHER than the several that I can think of - but can't print here!) that describe and explain the reasons for their actions: Arrogance - Ego - Hubris - Selfish - Contemptious - - and - - UNWELCOME!

DON'T GET ME STARTED!

DOC HARRIS
 
Ranchy, I was down to Deming a couple weeks ago and brought with me 5 good rains. I'm guessin that country south of Deming would look pretty tough in a drought. One day i was down in Juarez, and nearly got stranded by flooding.
 
Doc :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Too bad we can't say what we're really thinkin, huh? :wink:

Brad, ya shoulda stopped by, we're only 167 miles from Deming! :lol: :lol: :lol:
We were down in Palomas on the 12th, for Al's ortho appointment, there was water standing in all the fields, running across the highway, and all that good stuff, between Deming and Columbus. That country down there is awful........when it rains, or when it doesn't rain. We spent a couple of months there just before Al was born, and I hated the whole time. Of course, after the boss moved us to the place north of Roswell, Deming looked a whole lot better........... :lol:
I am anxious to see what it looks like after the rains when we go back on 9-9. Al's last ortho appointment! :D :) :D
 

Latest posts

Back
Top