• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Taking the Bull by the Horns

Bill

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
2,066
Location
GWN
Market Trends
National Meat Association


Born & Raised in the USA®


If a consumer package of imported beef had a label identifying the country from which it came, Carolyn Carey would never have developed her Born and Raised in the USA® label. However, as you and I know, Australia, New Zealand, Argentina and even Uruguay for that matter do not clearly identify their product for the US consumer to see. So, Carolyn, a rancher from Alturas, California decided it was high time to do something about it and developed her own label and even had it registered and trade marked. Now anyone who wants to use the phrase Born and Raised in the USA (I guess except for Bruce Springsteen) on a package of meat will have to get Carolyn's approval.

Doesn't that just make your heart proud? While all the big boys, and by that I mean NCBA and R-Calf not to mention the Congress of the United States, have been ruminating and fulminating over mandatory Country of Origin Labeling, a rancher decided to take some action to get something done about it. And, she did! She got a label approved by the USDA and registered it herself and snubbed her nose at the big boys. In fact, Carolyn's "Born and Raised in the USA®" is approved for not only beef but also lamb, pork, fish, game and fowl. As she pointed out to me recently, it's kind of neat how all those meats are four letter words.

I asked Carolyn why she decided to develop the label, and she said that it had nothing to do with anything other than trying to let the consumer know where their beef came from She said, "By default, US beef would be identified if beef from outside the US had a label that was maintained through to the final consumer." She told me, "I kept getting asked questions from other ranchers like, 'Why can't we label our own beef?' and I just decided that, yes we could." "It really wasn't too difficult to get the USDA approval," she said. "They just wanted to make sure that anyone I let use the label could darn well prove that the beef came from animals that were just like the label says, born and raised in the USA."

Carolyn's label, although she probably wouldn't admit it, is the perfect example of voluntary COOL. It may be voluntary but it's not free. She is an astute enough rancher and businesswoman to demand a royalty for her label. And she deserves every cent she gets for its use. In my discussions with Carolyn, I pointed out to her what a great marketing tool her label was and how valuable I thought it could become. She said that she certainly didn't develop it to become rich. But, she knows that it serves a valuable purpose. Unless and until there is something to take its place, she plans to just keep telling ranchers that they can identify their beef with a small flag (that's part of the registered label) and the words Born and Raised in the USA. This is a perfect example of guerrilla marketing at its best.

Should we have mandatory COOL or even voluntary? I don't know, but I sure admire someone who saw a marketing problem and turned it into marketing solution. When meat companies tell me that the beef business is dominated by a few big players or the retail sector is becoming dominated by a giant with lesser hangers on and they just can't do anything unless these behemoths agree and approve, I think of what Carolyn did. It should give you some hope, too. She didn't think of problems, she thought of solutions and then did what 99% of those who come up with a great idea don't do—she did whatever was necessary to turn her idea into a viable product.

We don't have to wait for the Supreme Court to reflect or rather review the beef check off and whether it is constitutional or not and whether it will continue. We don't have to wait for Congress to decide if food products from outside the US should have a label declaring so. We need to follow Carolyn's lead and do whatever we feel it will take to keep consumers informed about out products. Just remember one thing. If those products raised, manufactured and packaged off our shores are perceived by consumers to be better than those we produce, we have opened Pandora's Box. If it says Born and Raised in the USA, it better be better than those products that are not.

Mack H. Graves of Latigo, Inc., a meat and poultry marketing and management consulting company, wrote this Marketing Trends. You may reach him at his office phone: 303-699-7795, mobile: 303-882-5453, fax: 303-699-7206 or e-mail him at [email protected].
 
I have talked to Carolyn Carey, about her registered label Born and Raised in the USA, she applied for a grant, and received grant funds (your Check-Off-Dollars) from the Beef Promotion Research Board to develop her label. Also when she saw that ICON (Independent Cattle Of Nebraska) a R-CALF affiliate, was selling bumper stickers for $5.00 each as a fund raiser, using her registered trade mark without paying her royalties, she stoped them. Mike Callicrate, however does pay her and uses her label. COOL, with-out all the government red tape and animal ID that will be attached too it. I for one, am proud of Carolyn, for being the entrepreneur that she is.

Best Regards
Ben Roberts
 
Bill, Here are the bullet points;

What COOL does do is make it mandatory to put a US label on US product, thereby triggering that "approved-source-verification" requirement.

Existing USDA regulations are quite clear, and the new COOL law doesn't change that - in fact it reinforces the fact that a "USA Meat" label can only go on meat from animals born, raised, and processed exclusively in the United States just like fish.

The meat from any animal that's spent its entire life in the United States qualifies to wear this label and the required traceback can be provided for the retailer and the rancher by ScoringAg .

The new COOL law mandates the labeling of U.S. meat, not just foreign, all the requirements to do that must be met including source verification, trace-back compliance, and so forth. Those requirements pre-date COOL and are not going to go away.

But, no matter what source-verification system is used, some kind of production records have to be kept by the producer ... just like for income tax ... but they do not have to be bundled up and shipped with the cattle! They just need to be available in the event USDA wants to check.
 
Thanks for posting this, Bill. That's a great story of someone who believes in something so strongly that they put their money where their mouth is and do something about it. I support that type of COOL 100%. That's the way COOL needs to work. Not government mandated and government managed, but consumer driven and producer managed.

I've often wondered why R-CALF hasn't done something similar. Since they seem to be certain that M-COOL will save the US cattle industry, why didn't they try to start a similar branded program?

Looks to me like R-CALF could have diverted some of the producer money that was spent on lawyers and developed a "Product of USA" brand for R-CALF members only. That would have been great for membership and if it really provided a premium to producers, all of us would want to be members of R-CALF to take advantage of it.

Does anyone know if anything like that was ever seriously considered by R-CALF leadership?
 
PORKER said:
But, no matter what source-verification system is used, some kind of production records have to be kept by the producer ... just like for income tax ... but they do not have to be bundled up and shipped with the cattle! They just need to be available in the event USDA wants to check.
So...all we have to do is open the door and get on our knees when the USDA comes knocking? I bet that'll go over real good. Are all of you M-COOL guys on board for that? I'm sure as hell not... :???:
 
Texan said:
PORKER said:
But, no matter what source-verification system is used, some kind of production records have to be kept by the producer ... just like for income tax ... but they do not have to be bundled up and shipped with the cattle! They just need to be available in the event USDA wants to check.
So...all we have to do is open the door and get on our knees when the USDA comes knocking? I bet that'll go over real good. Are all of you M-COOL guys on board for that? I'm sure as hell not... :???:

It's easy for me and most folks. I will swear on my mother's grave and sign whatever makes them happy certifying that any animal carrying my brand has never been North of Bennett County, South Dakota.
 
Sandhusker said:
It's easy for me and most folks. I will swear on my mother's grave and sign whatever makes them happy certifying that any animal carrying my brand has never been North of Bennett County, South Dakota.
So...it's okay with you if ALL producers have to open their doors and open their books to inspection by the USDA just so you can have your pet project known as M-COOL? :???:
 
Texan said:
Sandhusker said:
It's easy for me and most folks. I will swear on my mother's grave and sign whatever makes them happy certifying that any animal carrying my brand has never been North of Bennett County, South Dakota.
So...it's okay with you if ALL producers have to open their doors and open their books to inspection by the USDA just so you can have your pet project known as M-COOL? :???:

Come on Texan, how hard and how intrusive was what I just described?
 
Texan said:
Sandhusker said:
It's easy for me and most folks. I will swear on my mother's grave and sign whatever makes them happy certifying that any animal carrying my brand has never been North of Bennett County, South Dakota.
So...it's okay with you if ALL producers have to open their doors and open their books to inspection by the USDA just so you can have your pet project known as M-COOL? :???:

I have right on all my affidavits that copies of my cow/calf records are available at request....
I gladly open my records now to anyone that is looking for horses to buy--pedigrees/ 7 generation pedigrees/ performance records/ DNA records/ etc.....
I have nothing to hide with my cattle, horses, or dogs....
 
It is not COOL that I am against--in fact I am highly in favor of COOL done in the right fashion. What I consider to be the "right fashion" would be voluntarily on branded beef that has met certain requirements. I just don't want to be assessed an extra cost in my production with no hope in retrieving it, like mandatory COOL controlled by the government would be.

Sandhusker, you like outside the box examples to further your arguements. Here is my take on how it will be. This exta cost in production that mandatory COOL would involve would be like you having to pay for a speeding ticket every time you went to Valentine. Not only would the trip to town be delayed every time from getting pulled over, but a stiff fine would also be involved. Believe it or not, M-COOL will end up doing just this.
 
...and I bet the IRS takes " I swear on my mothers grave that the expenses are all valid" too.

Until the US has a full ID program you better sign on with the lady from California and follow some type of traceable protocol.
 
Soapweed said:
It is not COOL that I am against--in fact I am highly in favor of COOL done in the right fashion. What I consider to be the "right fashion" would be voluntarily on branded beef that has met certain requirements. I just don't want to be assessed an extra cost in my production with no hope in retrieving it, like mandatory COOL controlled by the government would be.

Sandhusker, you like outside the box examples to further your arguements. Here is my take on how it will be. This exta cost in production that mandatory COOL would involve would be like you having to pay for a speeding ticket every time you went to Valentine. Not only would the trip to town be delayed every time from getting pulled over, but a stiff fine would also be involved. Believe it or not, M-COOL will end up doing just this.

I understand your concerns and appreciate attention to the bottom of the cash flow statement :lol: , but what extra costs of production are you going to have? All I see is the cost of one sheet of paper that states, "Any and all of the cattle carrying my registered brand have spent their entire lives in the USA." Ooops, you might have to make some copies. I"ll make them for you for free - heck, I'll do your original for free, too. Now, what other expenses are there?
 
Jason said:
...and I bet the IRS takes " I swear on my mothers grave that the expenses are all valid" too.

Until the US has a full ID program you better sign on with the lady from California and follow some type of traceable protocol.

The IRS takes less - they take a signature.
 
Soapweed said:
It is not COOL that I am against--in fact I am highly in favor of COOL done in the right fashion. What I consider to be the "right fashion" would be voluntarily on branded beef that has met certain requirements. I just don't want to be assessed an extra cost in my production with no hope in retrieving it, like mandatory COOL controlled by the government would be.

Sandhusker, you like outside the box examples to further your arguements. Here is my take on how it will be. This exta cost in production that mandatory COOL would involve would be like you having to pay for a speeding ticket every time you went to Valentine. Not only would the trip to town be delayed every time from getting pulled over, but a stiff fine would also be involved. Believe it or not, M-COOL will end up doing just this.

Problem is Soap-- that many of the Branded Beef programs can not compete when the multinational Packers/retailers are allowed to lie and mislabel- and tell the consumer they are providing the same product... Walmarts Choice Brand passed off as US beef with the USDA label may be a low select, standard, or worse from a chunk of cow out of Mexico or Australia....

USDA's allowing this to occur ruins many folks perception of good quality beef- and gradually over the years/generations acclimates the consumer taste to a poorer quality product-- which is exactly what the multinational Packers want, so they can sell more of the lower quality, cheaper purchased imported beef....

Several Branded programs have gone broke or had a tough time-because the consumer already thinks they are getting a US product because it has the USDA label on it- and is portrayed as such by the Big Packers/retailers....
 
Oldtimer said:
I have right on all my affidavits that copies of my cow/calf records are available at request....
I gladly open my records now to anyone that is looking for horses to buy--pedigrees/ 7 generation pedigrees/ performance records/ DNA records/ etc.....
I have nothing to hide with my cattle, horses, or dogs....
I do something very similar, OT. I have a computer printout of vaccination and treatment records, including vaccine lot numbers, expirations, etc. I keep a label off of every feed/mineral product that has been in front of that set of cattle. I tear off the box top/label from the vaccines that shows lot #, exp date, etc. I'll also provide invoices for those vaccines upon request. I make copies of my calving book showing birth dates, etc. I make available to buyers all of my previous calving books and calendars with bull turnouts, etc. Blah, blah, blah...

BUT...I do that for somebody that has their checkbook in hand. Not for a government bureaucrat that expects me to get on my knees at his convenience. :x
 
Soapweed said:
It is not COOL that I am against--in fact I am highly in favor of COOL done in the right fashion. What I consider to be the "right fashion" would be voluntarily on branded beef that has met certain requirements. I just don't want to be assessed an extra cost in my production with no hope in retrieving it, like mandatory COOL controlled by the government would be.
:nod: Yep, I agree completely.
 
Texan said:
Soapweed said:
It is not COOL that I am against--in fact I am highly in favor of COOL done in the right fashion. What I consider to be the "right fashion" would be voluntarily on branded beef that has met certain requirements. I just don't want to be assessed an extra cost in my production with no hope in retrieving it, like mandatory COOL controlled by the government would be.
:nod: Yep, I agree completely.

WHAT EXTRA COSTS????
 
Soapweed, you been drinking too much packer propaganda Kool-aid.

All beef coming into the USA is labeled for country of origin now. The cost to continue that label to the consumer is little or nothing.

Live imported animals simply have to be kept segregated, processed separately, and have a country of origin designation on the label after processing. Every USDA approved branded beef program does this. The cost is very little...but is more expensive to do in a high volume plant like the packers that are against COOL operate! They will have to buy Porker's system!!! :wink: :lol:
 
Sandhusker said:
Texan said:
Soapweed said:
It is not COOL that I am against--in fact I am highly in favor of COOL done in the right fashion. What I consider to be the "right fashion" would be voluntarily on branded beef that has met certain requirements. I just don't want to be assessed an extra cost in my production with no hope in retrieving it, like mandatory COOL controlled by the government would be.
:nod: Yep, I agree completely.

WHAT EXTRA COSTS????
Sandhusker, affidavits alone are NOT going to be sufficient to verify US born. REAL verification will take production records that are available for audit by somebody. If you want the federal government to be in charge, I think we should expect them to be that somebody.

Any dealings with the government (or anybody else) that will allow them access to our records will come with a cost to the producer - even if that cost is only some of our time. M-COOL will come with a cost for ALL producers - even those of us that are not in favor of it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top