Then perhaps you should answer it Sandman because I already said that I didn't know what the answer was. 

Agman presented Tyson's profit figures but there is no breakdown between Canadian and U.S. plants but why would there need to be?  Tyson's total profits in their beef plants is what really matters to Tyson.

There is no profit data available for Cargill but it won't be much different than Tyson's considering that they are competing for the same cattle and need to be equally as efficient.

Why don't you and Randy sort out Tyson and Cargill's position?

Randy says Cargill and Tyson wanted to keep the border closed.

R-CULT says Cargill and Tyson wanted to open the Canadian border.

YOU GUYS DISAGREE!

Neither will challenge the other on your polarized views as long as you are both blaming the same packers.  Hahaha!  Typical!

Packer blaming, what a waste of perfectly good oxygen.

Great job diverting the questions again Randy!

Yet another lie from you.

Nobody ever said that everything Tyson and Cargill do is good for the Canadian producer. 

In fact, I have repeatedly pointed out that Tyson and Cargill had an obvious leverage advantage due to more cattle than slaughter capacity in Canada post BSE.  Doesn't matter how many times I say that, you still have to paint your own picture of my position since i don't share your packer victim mentality and base my decisions on facts as opposed to opinions and baseless allegations.

Just more bullsh*t from overly emotional randy.

~SH~