• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The longest-ever recorded kill by a sniper in combat

RoperAB

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2006
Messages
1,435
Location
Alberta
Lying low beside the rifle, his stomach touching the ground, Cpl. Rob Furlong concentrated hard on his breathing. In, out. In, out. In, out. Deep, but not too deep. Slow, but not too slow. The tiniest twitch -- a heavy exhale, perhaps, or a breath held one second too long -- could jerk his weapon ever so slightly, turning a sure hit into a narrow miss. In the sniping world, where one shot should always equal one kill, steady breathing is just as crucial as steady aim.
On that March afternoon in 2002, Cpl. Furlong squinted through the scope of his McMillan Tac-50, a sleek bolt-action rifle almost as long as he is. In his crosshairs were three men, each lugging weapons toward an al-Qaeda mortar nest high in the mountains of eastern Afghanistan. Master Cpl. Tim McMeekin, hunkered behind his fellow sniper, saw the same trio through the lens of his Vector, a binocular-like device that uses a laser to pinpoint targets thousands of metres away. Speaking quietly, both soldiers agreed on the obvious: take out the biggest threat first, in this case the man in the middle carrying the RPK machine gun. According to the Vector, he was exactly 2,430 m away -- nearly 2 1/2 kilometres.
A Newfoundland boy with pale blue eyes and a chiselled frame, Furlong adjusted the elevation knob on his scope, the barrel of his gun pointing higher and higher with each turn. He knew the routine, had practised it a thousand times back at the base in Edmonton. The farther away the target, the higher the rifle should point. Wind blowing to the left? Aim slightly right. Most snipers will tell you it's not much different than a golfer and his caddie lining up a long putt. Calculation. Instinct. And a little bit of luck. "You can teach a certain amount of it," Furlong says. "But there is a large percentage that you must have naturally. A good shooter is born. You can't teach someone to be a good shot if they don't naturally have it."
The 26-year-old stared through the scope, his left finger tickling the trigger. In, out. In, out. Behind him, McMeekin gazed through his Vector, reconfirming the precise distance one last time. "Stand by," Furlong said.
The first shot missed. A second round missed too, but not by much. It pierced the man's backpack. "They had no fear," Furlong recalls of his target. "They didn't run. I guess they've just been engaged so many times." He immediately reloaded the chamber and lined up his rifle for a third try, checking to make sure his grip was flawless. Furlong knew exactly why that second shot missed; instead of following a perfectly straight line, he had squeezed the trigger a tiny smidgen to one side. Even a fraction of a millimetre can make a huge difference on the other end -- in this case, the difference between a man's knapsack and his heart.
"Stand by," Furlong said again. Another loud pop echoed through the valley, sending a .50-calibre shell -- rocket-shaped, almost as long as a beer bottle -- slicing through the Afghan sky. Four seconds later, it tore into the man's torso, ripping apart his insides.
By that point, Rob Furlong, Tim McMeekin and three other Canadian sharpshooters -- Graham Ragsdale, Arron Perry and Dennis Eason -- had spent nearly a week in the rugged terrain of Afghanistan's Shahikot Valley, reaching out and touching the enemy from distances even they had never trained for. But that shot was something special. Rob Furlong had just killed another human being from 2,430 m, the rough equivalent of standing at Toronto's CN Tower and hitting a target near Bloor Street. It was -- and still is -- the longest-ever recorded kill by a sniper in combat, surpassing the mark of 2,250 m set by U.S. Marine Gunnery Sgt. Carlos Hathcock during the Vietnam War.
http://www.macleans.ca/topstories/canada/article.jsp?content=20060515_126689_126689
 
Those 50 BMG's are amazing. That sniper was amazing too. I figure that the bullet drop at that distance was over 1500 inches. He had to have the right scope - and enough clicks to get the bullet that high.

Couldn't have been much of a wind blowing either.
That shot was approx 1.5 miles.

Here's some supposedly 50 Cal action on the Taliban:

http://www.sdcrew.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=5&pos=2
 
such a beautifull weapon, here's me with an M-107 in our tower.
Barrett007.jpg
 
actually it's a day and night sight, has a lever on the side to switch between. I think it's a PVS-10. It's really not a good fit for the Barrett. It's calibrated for a 7.62/.308. We ended up getting another day scope on it and at night mounted a universal night sight in front of it. The Universal night sight can mount in front of any scope or sight, I was told it costs about $10,000.

The pictures is sort of range cards. A surveryor took pictures and got the distance and direction to all sorts of land marks. The panoramics, as we call them, have buildings numbered with an azimuth and distance in meters. Makes it quick when we call something in. Like when we see a bomb go off near a building we refrence it on the panoramic, call it in. Notice the white lines under the weapon with the 300, that is also the azimuth in degrees. You have to stand in the center of the tower for accuracy.
 
Ben H said:
actually it's a day and night sight, has a lever on the side to switch between. I think it's a PVS-10. It's really not a good fit for the Barrett. It's calibrated for a 7.62/.308. We ended up getting another day scope on it and at night mounted a universal night sight in front of it. The Universal night sight can mount in front of any scope or sight, I was told it costs about $10,000.

The pictures is sort of range cards. A surveryor took pictures and got the distance and direction to all sorts of land marks. The panoramics, as we call them, have buildings numbered with an azimuth and distance in meters. Makes it quick when we call something in. Like when we see a bomb go off near a building we refrence it on the panoramic, call it in. Notice the white lines under the weapon with the 300, that is also the azimuth in degrees. You have to stand in the center of the tower for accuracy.

Gotcha! That's kinda like in my big deer shooting house. I've got PVC pipe with a different colored ribbon driven in the ground every hundred yards out, up to 1000 yds. surrounding the house so that I don't have to grab a rangefinder for every shot.

Great idea, taking a picture and calculating distance to each landmark! I might try that this year. I just learned something new.

Knowing distance is a must, but wind is my main problem. Any Tips? :wink:
 
Just curious how far do you consider it to be an ethical shot at a deer. If wind is affecting you that much you must be reaching out aways. I like to stretch things out on varmints but I tend to like to 'hunt' deer till i get pretty close. Some of those hunting shows on OLN you might as well go shoot a steer out of your halfton. Ben have you ever shot a .338 Lupua-I was at Dakota Arms in Sturgis, South Dakota one time and they showed me a custom built one-it was truly a work of art.
 
Mike said:
Knowing distance is a must, but wind is my main problem. Any Tips? :wink:

I used to do a lot of shooting. I dont really have the time or the interest anymore. Well im interested but I dont have the time.
Your elevation to sea level<mountains>, humidity, outside temp as well as the wind sure make a big difference at a 1/4 mile<440 yards> or more.
Due to economics my rig is an old Ruger M77 in 300WM toped with a 4.5 to 12 power Leapold Mark 3 with a harris bi-pod. I did the bedding and trigger job myself.
Anyway assumeing you have a rig thats accurate enough your just going to have to spend an awful amount of time in the field in different weather conditions doing a lot of shooting.
When I was right into it I was averageing about 2000 rounds of full powered 30/06 ammo a year. This doesnt count 22 ammo, pistol practice or underpowered cast bullets that I was useing in other rifles for off hand target shooting.
When you get out past even 300 yards it just takes a lot of feel and experience to be able to make accurate first shots.
Where I live its one of the windiest parts in North America. The wind is just something you have to get used to. Just takes lots of experience.
The last Elk I connected with was on a calm day. I simple walked the bullets to him<there was enough time to recover from recoil to see the bullets hit> My Kentucky windage was 8 feet over his back and five feet in front of his nose. Thats with a 130 grain barnes x bullet at 3500fps.
A heavy bullet with a high ballistic coeficient makes things a lot easier. Also the shorter the time of flight the better! I sure would love a 50 cal! Like a 30/06 180grain sure gets tossed around in the wind. At a thousand yards it will just barely go through 3/8" plywood! You can pick up your bullets on the other side of your backstop and they are not deformed at all except for the rifling grooves!
I tell you what makes excellent practice. Have one rifle and shoot it a lot under different weather conditions in different field positions at different ranges. Also gophers, prairie dogs and yodel dogs make excellent practice.
Also besides load development, dont waste time shooting from a bench.
About the article
You know thats quite the thing that Cpl. Rob Furlong did. Gosh it must give him a feeling of "being in charge" knowing that he could take out anybody within a mile and a half!
 
Also RT. Col. Jeff Cooper has some really good books. One of them is called "To Ride,Shoot Straight and Speak the Truth".
I leant my Cooper books out and they never where returned :(
 
Shooters not hunters-my two bucks last year were shot at 8 and 10 yards in the bush-still hunted. Long range markensmanship is an admirable skill but 'walking' bullets to a bull elk isn't my cup of tea. Too many long cold days spent tracking and finding bucks after those kind of deals for it to turn my crank. Like I said shoot gophers in the next county all you want but you owe it to the big game to get close enough to hit it with a kill shot the first time.
 
Northern Rancher said:
Just curious how far do you consider it to be an ethical shot at a deer. If wind is affecting you that much you must be reaching out aways. I like to stretch things out on varmints but I tend to like to 'hunt' deer till i get pretty close. Some of those hunting shows on OLN you might as well go shoot a steer out of your halfton. Ben have you ever shot a .338 Lupua-I was at Dakota Arms in Sturgis, South Dakota one time and they showed me a custom built one-it was truly a work of art.

It depends on the shooter. Also shooting game is different than shooting paper.
When I was guiding I would try to size up my clients. Man they could talk the talk. They could go on about balistics and gun culture. Talk about their shooting skills, etc.
Then I would call in a bull moose broadside to them at 20 yards and they would miss!!!!!!
You need the mindset, you have to be able to get in the zone. The military teaches this pretty good :wink:
 
Northern Rancher said:
Shooters not hunters-my two bucks last year were shot at 8 and 10 yards in the bush-still hunted. Long range markensmanship is an admirable skill but 'walking' bullets to a bull elk isn't my cup of tea. Too many long cold days spent tracking and finding bucks after those kind of deals for it to turn my crank. Like I said shoot gophers in the next county all you want but you owe it to the big game to get close enough to hit it with a kill shot the first time.

It was a long story and I have to get going to work so I dont have time to explain right now.
I was just illustrating what can be done and you dont need a ten thousand dollar rig to do it.
 
Northern Rancher said:
Just curious how far do you consider it to be an ethical shot at a deer. If wind is affecting you that much you must be reaching out aways. I like to stretch things out on varmints but I tend to like to 'hunt' deer till i get pretty close. Some of those hunting shows on OLN you might as well go shoot a steer out of your halfton. Ben have you ever shot a .338 Lupua-I was at Dakota Arms in Sturgis, South Dakota one time and they showed me a custom built one-it was truly a work of art.

It depends on the gun and bullet which distance is an ethical shot. With my 7MM STW I have to use a Ballistic Tip "Varmint" bullet from 600 yds out. That's because the velocity of the bullet has dropped to the point that the bullet won't "Open Up" properly on impact and just punches a small hole completely through the deer, which is unacceptable. The custom benchrest bullets with the thin jackets work well also. In this particular gun I have an extra long barrel and use a slow burning powder to get the maximum muzzle velocity. (around 4000 fps)

It also depends on the Ballistic Coeffeciency of the bullet itself and you must have good optics. A simple 3X9 scope won't get it and you must have target knobs and know how many clicks to go up at all your ranges.
"Holding Over" a target with your conventional crosshairs doesn't work very well.

Problem with the bigger calibers is........you can't get "Varmint" bullets in the heavier weights to allow for the velocity decline and impact deficiencies at the longer ranges. The solid and partition bullets are a no-no unless they are really screaming.

My 6mm-284 is another story altogether. I won't shoot a deer over 500 yds with it because it just doesn't have the energy to penetrate the boiler room.

About 300-350 is max for the hopped up 22 cals and you have to pick your shots well.

Dakota Arms are damn fine guns. I have a friend who has one in .300 Dakota and it does well on the 1000 yd range too. His smallest 1000 yd. group (5 shots) is about 12 inches.

I have also shot many deer with Buckshot at extremely close ranges. That's just not my cup of tea.

Off subject a little but we have a "Spear" hunting allowance here in Alabama. I've never done it but might enjoy it. A friend of mine is hooked.
 
I guess another thing to consider is our deer's body size compared to you-most mature bucks here are 300 pounds going into the rut-22 calibres aren't even legal to hunt with up here. There is nothing can take a bullet and keep going like a big northern whitetail they make bull moose look like pansy's. Up here a 300 yard shot is pushing it for most guys-considering it can be -40 during the rut-you tend not to shoot your best when your trigger finger solid white lol.
 
Northern Rancher said:
I guess another thing to consider is our deer's body size compared to you-most mature bucks here are 300 pounds going into the rut-22 calibres aren't even legal to hunt with up here. There is nothing can take a bullet and keep going like a big northern whitetail they make bull moose look like pansy's. Up here a 300 yard shot is pushing it for most guys-considering it can be -40 during the rut-you tend not to shoot your best when your trigger finger solid white lol.

Whitetail are tough that's for sure.

We used to have some 300 lb bucks when soybeans were grown everywhere, but no more. That's when the "Beanfield Rifles" became popular.

A 250 is about norm now.

You're deer are probably tougher from having to survive the cold winters too. Here all they have to dodge are a few coyotes and man.
 
Last year at Hudson Bay I shot a doe at 20 yards... but when we got back in the afteernoon of the next day, we had to go out tracking for someone that shot at a buck but couldnt find it... he had all the gizmos and all that so we asked how far the shot was... 500 yards with a .243.... needless to say I just about gave him a whuppin myslef, but the buck was hit weak, and only wounded... He said eh thought it was alot bigger, but he just saw the body and couldnt get a good look at the horns... we ended up taking it home cause he couldnt put it ontop of his beetle, and guess who diddnt pick it up? Guess who's lawn we oput it on in the spring? lol.

Dont shoot if youre not sure of the shot is all I can say.

Have a good one
 
Northern Rancher said:
Just curious how far do you consider it to be an ethical shot at a deer. If wind is affecting you that much you must be reaching out aways.

You know thats a good question and I guess the answer is that it all depends.
I think 200 yards is a really long shot for most hunters.
I know that with myself I really prefer to keep it within 440yards. It depends to if I know the range.
I will tell you though with elk the ranges tend to be way out there.

About bullet performance
Im very impressed with the Barnes X bullet. This bullet expands well at long range(600 to 700yards with a muzzle velocity of 3500fps.). I used it on my antelope. But yet it holds together at close range. You can literally shoot it into a gravel pile a few feet a way and still recover 85% of the bullet weight.

About whitetails
There will to live seems to be dependent on the circumstances of how they are taken. Example if you shoot them from a tree stand and they are relaxed they seem to go down pretty easy.
On the other hand if they are being chased <say a deer drive>and their adrenilin is pumping they can soak up a lot of lead.

Mike
You know I tend to think of 30 cal as small bore and anything smaller than that as a toy.
You might want to try going bigger because the heavier the bullet the better it retains velocity at long range, plus the bigger the bullet the less it has to expand.
So if it retains velocity better it will expand better and you also get less wind drift.
Im not sure what weight your useing in your 7mm but if your action is long enough you can always get a gunsmith to open up your rifles throat so you can seat heavier bullets out farther.
The problem with long range rigs is portibility. Like with horses even packing a 12 lbs rig is a bit of a chore. Really its about the max with horses.
I have had rifles weighing up to 20lbs and they are just to heavy for the field.
Even 12lbs is a pain to carry but with Elk we cant hunt them during the rut and the friggen shots are going to be long.
Thats what makes Elk so tough to hunt. You cant really pattern them like whitetails. Its nothing for them to travel 20 miles overnight.
Like its easy to see elk but even if there just walking a long and eating and not really trying to go anywhere they can cover so much ground. You almost have to know where there going and try to get ahead of them the next day because if you just try to trail them you wont catch up.
Plus its usually only at dawn and dusk that you will ever see them during rifle season. You really have to cover a lot of miles with elk.
Like around here you should have an idea about where they are bedding down and set up an ambush before they either leave there at dusk or before they get there at dawn. Trouble to is that your going to have up to a hundred head of cow elk between you and the bull plus your working with a short amount of daylight. Then add your scent and its really tough.
I will tell you right now that to be consistant on elk every year on public land is not an easy thing. Elk are way harder than anything else that I have hunted and I have hunted just about everything.
During the day they always bed down on the north slopes in the thickest tangles possible and I have yet to ever shoot one in its bed. Too many cows to warn the bulls.
Anyway elk hunting is way harder than what it sounds like. They can see through rocks, smell you miles away and hear your heart pounding. Plus the dumbest elk is smarter than the smartest whitetail that ever lived :lol:
 
Mike
You know I tend to think of 30 cal as small bore and anything smaller than that as a toy.
You might want to try going bigger because the heavier the bullet the better it retains velocity at long range, plus the bigger the bullet the less it has to expand.
So if it retains velocity better it will expand better and you also get less wind drift.
Im not sure what weight your useing in your 7mm but if your action is long enough you can always get a gunsmith to open up your rifles throat so you can seat heavier bullets out farther.

I've tried 30 cals (30-378 WBY) and such. The heavier bullets do not always have the highest BC because of sectional density.

The 7mm bullets I use are from 110 grain to 175 grain. Pretty wide window for white tails and/or varmints.

I have never been able to get a Barnes X to shoot in any of my guns. They tend to copper a barrel pretty bad and I keep mine clear of all coppering and carbon.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top