Randy that is a matter of opinion and it depends on which end of the huge advantage you are at if its a darn good IDEA.  :wink:

Randy my  beloved Daddy died of Cancer in 2002. And his Death still bothers me so Please refain for speaking about him in your sarcastic way.

And I have some more  questions about the BIG-C plan. If the plan is to lease the plant out to an operator wouldn't that make the Producers the landlords of the plant? and as landlords are we entitled to any of the profits of said plant? It also says that the lease operator would recieve a percentage of the profits  to cover his risk. Now if he is paying a fixed lease wouldn't that entitle him to all the profits and the Producers to only the percentage their shares represent in the plants lease payment? and if he is not paying a fixed lease just what is his risk that his percentage of the profits are to cover? He is getting the use of a brand new state of the art plant that is being paid for but someone else.

Now it does also state the possible use of hiring a Management team so if the team is being paid a wage to run the plant are they also entitled to profits to cover their risk, to which I have to ask what is they risk if they are being paid a WAGE?

Now it also says that the Producers that helped fund the Plant(which could mean every producer in Canada) would recieve the balance of the profit as dividends proportional to their investment. Alternately, dividends could be forgiven as better pricing and new export markets reward the producer with positive returns on their cattle. So Randy couldn't I realize these positive returns from any plant if they weren't competeing with your huge advantage for cattle and markets without actually owning the plant?  Who invests their hard earned money just  so they can forgive the payment of dividends during the salmon run as you call it?  And again if the plant is leased out who would be entitled to the profits?