The economic faux pas on the Robinson Patman Act example was indicative of the caliber of economic reasoning the appellate court possesses and made their "Daubert" issues a universal joke.  You may be able to fool those who less learned with your "accusations, unsupported theories and no facts" when your substance is simply wrong, Agman, but that will only get you a few cowboys who don't want to know anyway and a few judges who have sold out their country's laws.

Who would believe anything you have to say.