• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Wild Horses In Holding

OldDog/NewTricks

Well-known member
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
3,443
Location
The Dam End of Silicon Valley
I've been looking for this Site for some time now

http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=wild+horse+in+holding&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

I have found links that state there are 32,000 alone in Susanville, Ca.

I can't find figures on Totals or Daily/Monthly/Yearly Feed Cost
 
The following was provided by a faculty member at the University of
California, Davis, who was requested to respond to an earlier blog that
I forwarded to you.

From:
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 2:01 PM
To: Reynnells, Richard
Cc:
Subject: Disposal of Euthanized Horses?


When I was with FARAD I reviewed the issue of pentobarbital in pet food
from rendered animal products (see background material appended below).

The long and the short of it is that FDA reviewed the issue and
determined the levels detected in pet food was so small as to not
warrant new rules and regulations.

Relative to your question involving groundwater and euthanasia drugs, I
suspect that (based on the rendering investigation which demonstrated a
profound dilution) groundwater contamination would not be an issue. The
level of dilution in groundwater should be many times that observed in
rendering.

Of all of the various groundwater-drug surveys performed in the last few
years, none I am aware of that have reported pentobarbital. When surveys
have detected drugs in the groundwater, they most commonly have been
compounds like cholesterol & blood pressure medications, birth control
contraceptives, antibacterial products used in soaps, etc.

Importantly when detected these compounds are typically in the parts per
trillion level (PPT, think a sugar cube diluted in 1000 oil tankers of
water). The simple mass of these commonly used drugs flushed down the
drain, when compared to a relatively rare event of euthanasia product
used, has to be many, many orders of magnitude larger.

I am quite confident that pentobarbital, in the occasional buried
euthanized horse, would not be a groundwater issue. To be honest however
I'm unaware of any studies which could support my opinion.


On a related issue however, there is a very real danger of pentobarbital
containing carcasses harming wildlife. There is an excellent pamphlet
at:

http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/poison.pdf

It is absolutely critical that horse owners prevent access of wildlife
(or pets) to the carcass of a euthanatized a horse until the body is
properly disposed of.

Aside from the drug issue however, in general burying livestock is not
an optimal practice, primarily because of the degradation products
(especially salt) contaminating ground or surface water. As an
occasional event, the groundwater system should be able to absorb the
sporadic horse burial.



However if it livestock burial becomes a common practice there could be
very real issues related to groundwater contamination. That is why, for
instance, dairy cow burial has been prohibited in the central valley by
the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. If for
instance, all of the central valley's dairy producers were to bury
mortalities (say 1 to 5% on-farm mortality of the state's 1.8 million
dairy cows) we might experience a real groundwater problems.

There is also the legal issue. Below is part of a draft Q&A which we are
working on in our state's Emergency Animal Disposal Workgroup (EADW).
Bottom line: people who wish to bury horses legally must be in
compliance with county and other local regulations.

What are my options for disposing of dead horses?

California's Food & Ag Code (FAC 19348) regulates movement of all
livestock carcasses including cattle, sheep, goats, swine and horses.
These animals may only leave the farm premises only if traveling: 1) to
a licensed rendering plant or collection site for a rendering plant 2)
to an animal disease diagnostic laboratory, 3) to the nearest
crematorium, 4) out-of-state with regulatory approval by the destination
state. While the Food & Ag Code allows for on-site burial, local or
regional regulations frequently prohibit it. For information relative to
on-site disposal of horses contact the agency in your county which deals
with environmental health issues: (http://www.ccdeh.com/roster.asp
<http://www.ccdeh.com/roster.asp> ).

In counties which do allow on-site burial, or during emergencies in
which burial bans are waived, Dr. John Kirk made some recommendations
about how to bury with the least amount of environmental impact:

http://www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/vetext/INF-DA/INF-DA_BURIAL.HTML

The shortest answer I can give is that the most environmentally friendly
way of dealing with horse mortalities is rendering. I would expect about
a $100 to $200 charge for rendering. I do understand however that
rendering would be completely unacceptable to most horse owners. My
family owns several horses and my wife would divorce me for even
thinking about it.

While landfill disposal of horses is not an option in California it may
be in other states. Typically however landfills can only accept
materials that the facility has a regulatory permit to accept. Thus,
some landfills may accept horses or other livestock while other
landfills even in the same county may not. It states where landfill
disposal of horses is an option, it would always be wise to call ahead
to a particular facility and confirm they can accept the carcass.

Similarly, composting horses is not an option in California, since
composting of any mammalian flesh is prohibited in the state. This
prohibition stemmed from early fears about BSE spreading from composted
cow remains to fields to forage crops to other cows. The University of
California has an active livestock composting research program underway.
We are concentrating on dairy cows now and don't have any immediate
plans to include horses, although I would expect the cow data would be
transferable at least in respect to environmental protection
recommendations.

Lastly, the last time I checked Sacramento Rendering does offer horse
cremation. It's not cheap however, when I last inquired it ran about
$800 to $1000.
 
A waist of Food for Lions and other Animals _ About Time to reopen Horse Slather Houses
Where will it STOP _ Now that they have their foot in the door _ Next why not stop the Slather of Cows. Sheep, Pigs?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25465974/

And what of our Ground Water?
 
Wild Horses May Face Death Sentence

by John McChesney

Listen Now add to playlist
Enlarge
Wendy von Wiederhold/NPR
About 100 miles north of Reno, a chopper pilot herds wild horses into a funnel-shaped trap.


Enlarge
John McChesney/NPR
Recently corralled horses jostle for position. In the wild, they stick to their own family bands. Captured, they are suddenly forced to reestablish a social hierarchy.


Enlarge
John McChesney/NPR
Wranglers, employed by the Bureau of Land Management, are tasked with organizing thousands of wild horses every year.


Enlarge
John McChesney/NPR
This steel-walled channel at one of BLM's adoption centers leads to a veterinarian station where horses will be vaccinated, de-wormed and branded.


Morning Edition, July 21, 2008 · With the price of hay up and horse adoptions down, a federal agency may begin killing wild horses to deal with surplus numbers. Letting evolution take its course doesn't cut it these days, the Bureau of Land Management says, prompting wild horse advocates to rally around this symbol of the old West.

On a recent afternoon, a group of journalists and BLM officials gather in a mountain-framed valley about 100 miles north of Reno, Nev. Someone whispers, "here they come" and over a mile a way a small plume of dust can be seen against sage-covered mountains, followed by flashing helicopter blades.

Soon dark dots emerge in the valley, then flowing manes and tails, as the chopper pilot herds the horses into a funnel-shaped trap.

A wrangler releases a so-called "Judas horse," who has been trained to lead the wild ones into the final approach to the trap. The captives mill about, wild-eyed and confused. They look sleek and fit.

Suddenly there's a "whack" — as a mama rears up and protects her foal with a double-hoofed kick to an encroaching mare. It's one of the ways the new social order is solidified.

"There's a social hierarchy here, you know different family bands and now we've got 'em all mixed together in this kind of situation where they're getting kind of rustled around," explains wild horse specialist Glenna Eckel of the BLM.

Maintaining Nature's Balance

The federal agency is responsible for managing about 250 million acres of public lands throughout the West. "Protecting, managing and controlling wild horses" falls under these responsibilities, and every year the organization captures about 10-12,000 horses, about half of them in Nevada alone. Not enough, according to ranchers; too many, according to animal rights activists.

Letting Darwinian nature take its course just won't work in this case, Eckle says. That's largely because wild horses don't have a natural predator — their population doubles every four years.

"Yeah, horses die. But before all that happens you've potentially ruined your soils, you've destroyed your plant communities," she explains. "The wildlife and the other critters" — meaning deer, elk and cattle — "that rely on this country are probably long-dead or moved out of the country ... it's a bigger, more complex picture than just horses."

But once they are captured, BLM faces another dilemma; what to do with the horses. Currently there are about 30,000 in holding facilities; nearly equal to the number left in the wild.

Weighing Adoption, Euthanasia And Slaughter

Adoption is certainly the most palatable option. At the BLM's wild horse adoption center in Palomino Valley, just north of Reno, horses thrash about in a steel-walled channel, which leads to a veterinarian station where they will be vaccinated, de-wormed and branded with a cold iron dipped in liquid nitrogen.

The transition to captivity comes with its risks. Last year the center lost 180 of about 1,000 horses to salmonella; accustomed to feeding on brush, bacteria multiplied in their stomachs when they were switched to hay.

Adding to BLM's fiscal woes, the cost of hay doubled in Nevada in the last year.

The real problem however, is that the horses aren't going anywhere.

"Our adoption record is clearly down," says Suzie Stokke of the Nevada BLM. "It's been on a downward trend for the last decade. We used to adopt about 8,000 animals annually. Certainly the economy, fuel prices, hay prices, all those things are having a factor in terms of our adoption market."

So the bureau is looking at unpopular options, such as "sale without limitation" — a euphemism for selling horses for slaughter — or euthanasia.

"To use euthanasia as a convenience to cut down numbers of healthy horses — to me, the public's not going to stand for it," insists Dr. Michael Kirk, an equine veterinarian with the Nevada Commission for the Preservation of Wild Horses.

He says euthanasia should only be used to prevent suffering. Chris Heyde of the Animal Welfare Institute agrees and points a finger back at the BLM.

"The reason we're in this position is simply because of horrendous management of the program by the Bureau of Land Management. We've been screaming about this for decades — that the system is broken and sadly in the last 10 years, it's gotten even worse because of their proposal to do mass roundups."

Heyde says the BLM has a built-in conflict of interest; the agency is the tool of cattlemen who graze cows on the same public land used by wild horses.

Third-generation rancher Ron Cerri, president of the Nevada Cattlemen's Association, says BLM's roundups have to continue.

"Right now the West, in particular Nevada, is facing a drought," he says. "Stopping [roundups] would lead to the ranges being overused. It would lead to horses starving. It would lead to horses dying for lack of water, and it just isn't something the public would want to see and not something that ranchers would want to see."

BLM and others are no doubt counting on public pressure to increase the budget for care of this national symbol. Meanwhile a lot of fine horses remain in BLM corrals, waiting for someone to adopt them. :roll:
 
The average cost for BLM to keep the horses in holding pens is about $1.60 to $1.70 per horse per day ($1.60/$48.00/$576) all depending on what pen they are at.

As of June 2008, BLM was holding 30,088 animals in holding facilities in 10 western states. I have not reserved the per short term or long term holding facility population yet But I know Nevada has approx 15,000 horses alone.

OldDog/NewTricks said:
I've been looking for this Site for some time now

http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=wild+horse+in+holding&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

I have found links that state there are 32,000 alone in Susanville, Ca.

I can't find figures on Totals or Daily/Monthly/Yearly Feed Cost
 

Latest posts

Back
Top