I don't know that DOC would agree with you 100%. He might agree with you that bigger isn't necessarily better, but that doesn't mean that smaller is always better, either.cowhunter said:Finely, some body that agrees with me 100 percent!
A 1,000 pound cow is one thing - but a 700 pound cow is an entirely different matter. Your example of running Angus bulls on "scrub cattle" and being able to sell calves for just as much as other calves of that size might work for you, but it sure cheats the next guy that owns them.
It's no different than the Longhorn-Charolais cross that we see a lot of in Texas. Guys buy $300 Longhorn cows, run a Char bull on them and as long as they sell the calves weighing around 300-350, you can't really tell 'em apart and they bring the same money. So I get them in on an order with some other Char cross calves and they've cost me just as much money. But when I get them straightened out and turn them out, they start showing up within a few months.
And by the time I have yearlings ready to sell, many of them no longer fit the group. I have to sort those off and take a pretty good loss on them. Because if anything expresses even the slightest bit of Longhorn look - either in muscling or color - I'm not going to take a chance on him going to the feedlot with a good set of yearlings with MY brand on them.
Yeah, I could probably get some of those cattle by without anybody noticing. But since I see them every day, I KNOW what they are and how they WON'T perform in the feedyard. So, since I know what they are by that time, they get cut off - and I lose money on them.
Just looking out for yourself and not thinking about the next guy that owns your calves is one of the things wrong with this industry right now...