• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

100 New R-CALF members in Iowa

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
A

Anonymous

Guest
3/17/2006 5:51:00 PM


R-CALF: More Than 100 New Members Join During Iowa Meetings



South Central Iowa – R-CALF USA CEO Bill Bullard recently toured south central Iowa and spoke to more than 360 producers about factors affecting the U.S. cattle market and what action they should take to ensure a profitable and viable live cattle industry long into the future. More than 100 participants took the opportunity to become members of R-CALF USA.



Bullard pointed out that producer profits ought to be going through the roof because of 2005's decreased slaughter numbers and the overall increase in beef demand.



"In addition, our industry is experiencing the largest spread between domestic production and domestic consumption in 40 years, yet, prices are falling because packers cast a cloud over the industry by closing plants in January and by following these plant closings with an absence from the cash market for a two-week period," Bullard explained. "Packers are again using their captive-supply cattle to stay out of the market for extended periods, particularly in the Kansas and Texas markets.



"Canadian cattle are adding to those captive supplies by entering the U.S. at a rate of 100,000 head per month and these cattle have been selling for well under U.S. prices, at $76 cwt to $78 cwt for Select Grades 1 and 2," he noted. "Once again, access to cheaper imported cattle and unlimited access to captive-supply cattle have given packers control over the price of your cattle, and they're using this control to drive your prices down.



"As long as cattle producers stand by and say nothing, packers will continue to manipulate the market and push USDA and Congress to expedite free trade agreements with as many cattle-producing nations as they can," Bullard continued. "Packers will push to lower current health and safety standards in the U.S. so that countries with lower standards may export their beef and cattle to us, and packers will procure as many cattle as they can through captive-supply arrangements in order to stay out of the cash markets as much as possible."



Bullard said independent U.S. cattle producers immediately must take steps to rebuild and compete for their share of the domestic market, and that R-CALF USA's four-step plan could help them survive in this highly competitive beef industry.



"First, we must implement Mandatory Country-of-Origin Labeling (M-COOL), so you will have the tools to compete in the global market," Bullard pointed out. "Secondly, we must limit the packers' use of captive-supply cattle, thereby removing the tools they are using to interfere with your competitive market.



"Third, we must ensure that special rules and safeguards are included in trade agreements that recognize the perishable and cyclical nature of your industry, and finally, we must work to maintain the highest health and safety standards in the world to protect your industry from the introduction of foreign animal diseases and to ensure the highest quality and safest product for your customers," concluded Bullard.



A team of five R-CALF USA Iowa members worked to make the meetings in Lamoni, Creston and Russell a huge success: Monte Akers, of Kellerton; Terry Barnes, of Lamoni; Charles Beck, of Kellerton, Iowa; Tom Osborn, of Grand River; and, Jim Werner, of Diagonal. Creston Livestock Auction, Iowa State Savings Bank, and First National Bank sponsored the meal served at Creston. Russell Sale Co. hosted the Russell meeting and also sponsored the meal.



"Everything Bill said makes sense, such as COOL and the reasons we need it," Akers said. "American packing companies are going to South America and building plants so that once trade opens with those countries, they will be able to ship cheap beef back here, duty-free.



"The control that USDA will have with the Animal ID database is a large concern to producers here," continued Akers. "The paperwork that will come along with the program will put a lot of small producers out of business. Worry about vertical integration of the cattle industry is also a huge issue in this part of the country."



Werner said he was really pleased with the outcomes of the meetings, and acknowledged the support from area media and event sponsors.



"We have a lot of work ahead of us, but this is a good foundation," Werner said. "In this area, awareness of R-CALF was low, and these meetings have given us a good start."



"Complacency is a huge issue, so we try to get people to listen to the R-CALF message and begin to think about cattle-producer issues," said Beck. "Sure, we want members and money, but we want people to get involved in their industry more, to become proactive in order to remain in the business we have chosen."



"Bill Bullard does a wonderful job of explaining the history of the industry up to the present-day," said Barnes. "I think that everyone that was involved in organizing these meetings came away with a lot of energy and excitement about growing the organization.



"Niche marketing opportunities may disappear if Animal ID is implemented, since everyone's product would bear the same information," Barnes continued. "I have always been in favor of COOL because it gives us a level playing field to compete in the global market and a chance to distinguish my product."



"It doesn't cost a thing to come to the meetings, so the least producers can do is come and listen with an open mind to what is going on in the industry," noted Osborn. "We tell producers that R-CALF is an organization that represents the producer only."
 
Bullard pointed out that producer profits ought to be going through the roof because of 2005's decreased slaughter numbers and the overall increase in beef demand.

"Once again, access to cheaper imported cattle and unlimited access to captive-supply cattle have given packers control over the price of your cattle, and they're using this control to drive your prices down.

From Cattlenetwork:
Beef exports in January were up 83% from 12 months earlier, but down 59.1% from January 2003, before BSE in North America.




The first month of 2006 saw a 20% increase in beef imports into the U.S. Much of the increase in our beef imports was from Australia. For some reason beef imports from Australia were quite small in January of 2005.



Our imports of feeder cattle from Mexico in January were up 24.7% from 12 months earlier. Our total live cattle imports in January were up 137.8% from 12 months earlier. Remember, the border to live cattle imports did not open until sometime in July last year.
 
Now how the hell is Canadian beef managing to sell for less than US beef? I can tell you it aint because I've been giving anyone a discount. And shouldn't better quality beef be bringing a premium anyway???? :???: Maybe I better join rcalf too, and correct some of these injustices.
 
Silver, it is true that Canadian beef in US feedlots are bringing 2-3$$ less. Only this week, did I see a bunch of Canadian cattle bring the same price. This according to a marketing site I monitor. I believe the packers know the cattle have to move before the 30 months are expired. The packers report the lower bids due to lower grading of the Canadian cattle.
 
Niche marketing opportunities may disappear if Animal ID is implemented, since everyone's product would bear the same information," Barnes continued. "I have always been in favor of COOL because it gives us a level playing field to compete in the global market and a chance to distinguish my product."


How is MID going to make all the beef the same quality? Niches look for specialties such as Grass fat or leaness or ageing. That statement is just another scare tactic by R-CALF.
 
Big Muddy rancher said:
Niche marketing opportunities may disappear if Animal ID is implemented, since everyone's product would bear the same information," Barnes continued. "I have always been in favor of COOL because it gives us a level playing field to compete in the global market and a chance to distinguish my product."


How is MID going to make all the beef the same quality? Niches look for specialties such as Grass fat or leaness or ageing. That statement is just another scare tactic by R-CALF.

Look a little deeper, BMR. With MID in the hands of the packers, they will have the control of the value added that MID information might bring instead of the producers. Again, they have the keys to the gate. Rkaiser's and Robert Macs should have control of their value added instead of losing it at the packer's gate.

The argument is not that MID will make all beef the same quality, it is that the quality characteristics information will be controlled by the packers.
 
Econ101 said:
Big Muddy rancher said:
Niche marketing opportunities may disappear if Animal ID is implemented, since everyone's product would bear the same information," Barnes continued. "I have always been in favor of COOL because it gives us a level playing field to compete in the global market and a chance to distinguish my product."


How is MID going to make all the beef the same quality? Niches look for specialties such as Grass fat or leaness or ageing. That statement is just another scare tactic by R-CALF.

Look a little deeper, BMR. With MID in the hands of the packers, they will have the control of the value added that MID information might bring instead of the producers. Again, they have the keys to the gate. Rkaiser's and Robert Macs should have control of their value added instead of losing it at the packer's gate.

The argument is not that MID will make all beef the same quality, it is that the quality characteristics information will be controlled by the packers.



In Canada the ownership of cattle is held in a the same type of data bank as oil companies use. The information is released to CFIA in case of Reportable diease. When age verification is checked on cattle the ownership of those cattle does not show. So tell how that gives the packers all this importtant info. We can buy tags 2 years in advance if we want so it doesn't even give a real idea of numbers of cattle. Your just some guy that wants to impress people with some BS and you don't even understand the basics of this industry.
 
BMR, you illustrate how it is supposed to work. It doesn't always work that way. Industry has a way of getting the information they want. MID with central databases makes that easier for them. Canada is only 5% of the U.S. beef, it is not that big of a potential problem----yet.

BMR"Your just some guy that wants to impress people with some BS and you don't even understand the basics of this industry."

You are not looking at how things COULD play out. You haven't had a very good track record with even getting good information from your govt. reports on the industry (Alberta report) and what is happening in it. The basic understanding you think you have is being used and you don't say anything about it. The U.S. is being led down the same path the packers took the Canadians and there are a lot of people down here that don't want to repeat those mistakes even if Canadians like you are happy about their results.
 
BMR- All it takes is 1 disgruntled employee or 1 employee slipped the right amount of money under the table and the security of the entire data base could be compromised....It has happened with military, law enforcement and even nuclear program computer systems- and happens quite regularly in the commercial world...What makes you think it could not happen with a multi billion $ cattle industry? There is the money there to make it happen....

That is the reason if we have to go with an ID system I like the multi provider system over the 1 data base- makes it much harder to get all the info at a one stop shot.......
 
ID will make a huge difference in what the packers know about where poor, excellent, or average cattle come from, and which producers provide them.

The feedlots already know where the different types/grades of cattle are.

What the feedlots know...............the packers know.

Selling on the Grid has assured the packer/feeder information he has never been privy to in the past. ID will definitely pinpoint more detail.

We would be surprised as to what they already know. This is the information age.
 
What I am worried about is the supply/demand type of information and a little on the quality characteristics. A big company like Tyson's has a big market position. One of the things Pickett uncovered was that Tyson had so much market power that they were able to buy lesser quality grade animals on the grid and depress the cash market, which was the price setting market for their contracts, and even formula pricing. There was not enough competition in the markets to not allow them to depress the cash market this way and get away with the market manipulation. When the amount of supply on the market is satisfied by production, due to the inelastic characteristics of demand, there is a possiblility for price manipulation. When future supplies are thus calculated by MID, you can extend this power. The 14 day prohibition on ownership in one introduced bill may not be enough to prevemt this type of manipulation in the future.

If MID is for health concerns and tracking down diseased cattle, a fragmented source for a database still addresses these concerns and does not give the market manipulation powers over.


BMR, do you believe in allowing market power to get so big that you can not ever say anything negative about packers without fear of retalition as was evidenced in Mike Callicrate's deal? Packers should be in the business of packing, and should not influence the supply except through pricing that awards quality characteristics of the cattle offered for sale. To discriminate against anyone like Mike Callicrate said happened in the article posted is an abuse of market power. JoAnn Waterfield at GIPSA stifled justice in that deal and stifled potentially constructive criticism by suppliers. That is not how free markets work.
 
When future supplies are thus calculated by MID, you can extend this power. The 14 day prohibition on ownership in one introduced bill may not be enough to prevemt this type of manipulation in the future.

With MID coming ,there should only be a 5 day owership window for packers.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top