$30 BN Gov. subsidy to millionaires

[Mike]

Only problem Cutterone is a family making 30K annually would pay a higher percentage than a family making 300K.

Not necessarily true and wrong most of the time. Get your facts straight.

Not necessarily but not necessarily false either.

So it's just a lie some of the time, or most of the time. That make you feel better? :roll:

 

[TSR]

Just like you I'll let the readers think for themselves and decide. It doesn't take a physics professor to decide there are thousands of scenarios pro and con on who would pay the most but I was speaking in general terms.

 

[Mike]

Just like you I'll let the readers think for themselves and decide. It doesn't take a physics professor to decide there are thousands of scenarios pro and con on who would pay the most but I was speaking in general terms.

Look. The more you make, the higher the percentage goes up. Not the other way around.............In general terms. :roll:

 

[TSR]

I've been wrong before Mike but Cutter was talking about a National Sales Tax. Wouldn't the amount paid on such a tax depend solely on the amount spent irregardless of income??

 

[hypocritexposer]

I've been wrong before Mike but Cutter was talking about a National Sales Tax. Wouldn't the amount paid on such a tax depend solely on the amount spent irregardless of income??

you could consider it a National sales tax or a consumption tax really.

Canada has aa National sales tax (GST), but I consider it a consumption tax. the more I use/consume, the more I pay. Prolong the life of my tv and not buy "bigger and better", the more I save.


And it is ultimately the consumer that pays it