Northern Rancher said:CIDR's work pretty well on heifers but we've done it every way under the sun. It depends more on the feeding regimen and body condition of the heifer than the synch program-the program is usually what gets blamed when a breeding deal goes bad. Big fat stale heifers are about the worst things to try and get bred.
hopalong said:For those of you who do, are you syncing them, if so what are you using?
RMUG said:I would agree that Natural Heat detection is the Best.
But if Synching heifers, first and foremost I would use MGA it is the best synch for heifers only if you are able to mix in a ration and have adequate bunk space for every animal.
Second I would use the 14 day CIDR program, it is far better way on heifers vs the 5 day or 7 day. Much cleaner and less problems. And Higher conception when using any of the CIDR programs.
with 5 day or 7 day I have had and seen many other have problems with the ones not getting bred on AI service, just not getting bred for at least 2 more cycles
Just my HONEST opinion! Seeing how I AI several thousand a year. And I am no expert, you need to ask the purebred breeders that breed just a few a year and or have another job not related to the cattle industry that know all there is to know :lol: :roll:
90% of all the heifers in the protocol or 90% of the ones you breed?red61 said:We use MGA. The past couple years we've been having 90%+ conception rates on it.
leanin' H said:Without hijacking the thread, what do ya'll consider a successful % of A.I.ed heifers that catch? I got 50% on my first go around which made me happy. I'd like to get better and wondered what to shoot for!Good thread!
Justin said:leanin' H said:Without hijacking the thread, what do ya'll consider a successful % of A.I.ed heifers that catch? I got 50% on my first go around which made me happy. I'd like to get better and wondered what to shoot for!Good thread!
all of them :wink:![]()
leanin' H said:I have always been way below average!:wink: