• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

BSE case draws criticism of USDA,FDA

Manitoba_Rancher

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
2,117
Location
Canada
Major political figures from across the spectrum have joined consumer groups and others in criticizing various aspects of USDA's and FDA's procedures for protecting animals and humans from bovine spongiform encephalopathy and its human form, variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, called on USDA to speed up its national animal identification plan and possibly make it mandatory, warning that if USDA doesn't have "guts enough to make a decision that we're moving forward … Congress is going to have to act." His Iowa Democratic counterpart, Sen. Tom Harkin, meanwhile, called on USDA and FDA to ban poultry litter from cattle feed when FDA revises feed ban rules later this year.

Meanwhile, Farm Sanctuary, an animal welfare group, joined Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y., in calling for a permanent ban on all downer (non-ambulatory) animals in the food supply. USDA has temporarily banned downers, but farmers and processors have protested that many downers may be injured, not diseased. "In addition to BSE, downed animals are more likely to be contaminated with fecal pathogens and other diseases, and it is impossible to move them humanely," said Gene Bauston, president and cofounder of Farm Sanctuary, which has called for such a ban since its inception 20 years ago.

The discovery of the BSE case in Alabama created a stir in neighboring Tennessee, whose cattle industry is its largest agricultural product. A state representative introduced a bill banning all feed containing any cattle parts or bone meal made from any ruminant. That would include feed for poultry and hogs, and would go well beyond current FDA feed regulations.
 
Source of above was

LEGAL/REGULATORY NEWS
BSE case draws criticism of USDA, FDA

by Pete Hisey on 3/16/2006 for Meatingplace.com

Banning chicken litter and downers and implementing an MID system?
Looks like the US may finally be working towards matching Canadian standards.
 
Bill said:
Source of above was

LEGAL/REGULATORY NEWS
BSE case draws criticism of USDA, FDA

by Pete Hisey on 3/16/2006 for Meatingplace.com

Banning chicken litter and downers and implementing an MID system?
Looks like the US may finally be working towards matching Canadian standards.

Bill, you only have MID because you have bse. As I said before, the feeding of MBM of possible bse infected animals to chickens is the real culprit here.

You are right in one respect, our past policies are making us match the Canadian BSE "infection" rate.
 
actually econ 101 the mid in canada came into force jan 1/01. the system was instituted because it was obvious from the experience of other countries that disease issues would have to be dealt with in a better manner than previously. i guess the usa didn't take the hint. as far as infection rates go you can only guess at the rate down there because usda ran a phony testing program and didn't learn from the experiences of other countries who tried to hide and coverup the existence of the disease or condition or whatever it is. it's obious there is a lot not known about bse and other tse's and powers that be use that to further their own causes.
 
don said:
actually econ 101 the mid in canada came into force jan 1/01. the system was instituted because it was obvious from the experience of other countries that disease issues would have to be dealt with in a better manner than previously. i guess the usa didn't take the hint. as far as infection rates go you can only guess at the rate down there because usda ran a phony testing program and didn't learn from the experiences of other countries who tried to hide and coverup the existence of the disease or condition or whatever it is. it's obious there is a lot not known about bse and other tse's and powers that be use that to further their own causes.

don, you are right on the bse. My problem with MID is that it has the potential of putting a lot of information into the hands of the packers. I support a fragmented but complete MID that has tracability but only after you go through a few steps on individual cattle. No national database controlled by just a few in the meat business.

MID could be another way for Tyson to try to pass off the feed transmission liability off to the producers instead of stopping MBM in poultry feed.
 
don said:
actually econ 101 the mid in canada came into force jan 1/01. the system was instituted because it was obvious from the experience of other countries that disease issues would have to be dealt with in a better manner than previously. i guess the usa didn't take the hint. as far as infection rates go you can only guess at the rate down there because usda ran a phony testing program and didn't learn from the experiences of other countries who tried to hide and coverup the existence of the disease or condition or whatever it is. it's obious there is a lot not known about bse and other tse's and powers that be use that to further their own causes.

You're right on Don.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top