• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Can you trust the USDA organic label?

ranch hand

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 4, 2005
Messages
1,360
Location
USA
By Dennis T. and Alex A. Avery

ESR (Enter Stage Right)

August 14, 2006



Consumers across the country are paying higher prices for fruits, vegetables, milk and bread that carry the USDA Organic label. What does the label mean?



Apparently, not much. There's almost no testing of organic produce for pesticide residues, though all farmers use pesticides of some sort.



The USDA Organic label means only that an independent certifier -- hired by the farmer -- did a once-a-year walk over the farm, looked briefly at the farmer's records, and took his or her word that all of the vague organic rules were being followed. There are only 56 organic certifiers to oversee some 20,000 organic farmers working more than 2 million acres of land, supposedly without synthetic pesticides, nitrogen fertilizers or genetically engineered seeds.



The U.S. Department of Agriculture tested only 127 organic samples in the five years from 1994 to 1999 for residues of such organically banned pesticides as Roundup and 2, 4-D. No samples were tested for residues of copper sulfate, the toxic organic pesticide. California, which produces half of America's organic produce, has been testing about 100 organic produce samples per year.



When the Dallas Morning News this spring asked for records of all organic farming violations, the Department said it would take six months to assemble them. Barbara Robinson, head of the organic unit, said she had only eight or nine employees who were stretched over many duties.



The industry has thousands of true believers who would stop farming before they violated organic principles. However, the organic foods' high profit margins have attracted millions of tons of production, massive processing plants, big contracts -- and strong pressures to deliver daily.



"There's definitely people who don't follow the rules," says Conner Updike, who grows organic beans and squash in central Florida. He fertilizes his fields with chicken manure, but has heard that other "organic" growers cheat with ammonium nitrate, which costs half as much, is easier to use, and impossible to detect.



USDA auditors report that certifiers have approved farms despite evidence that banned chemicals were used. Some certifiers gave approval without any inspection. Several audits note the same problems with the same certifiers year after year. Yet the USDA has never revoked or suspended a certifier's accreditation.



An increasing share of the organic produce in American stores is coming from China. The trend is likely to continue, since China has lots of hand labor to support the higher labor intensity of organic farming.



In the Dallas Morning News of July 25, Paula Lavigne quotes a Chinese sales official who said workers there sometimes fertilize the organic food crops with human waste. It's a common practice in China, but a major violation of the USDA rules.


Lavigne also quotes Matsumi Sakuyoshi, a Japanese inspector who has checked Chinese soybean fields for organic certifiers. Sakuyoshi found an empty plastic bag of herbicide. When confronted, a farmworker told her the wind must have blown it from a neighbor's field.



Sakuyoshi also questioned a certificate that said a piece of land hadn't been farmed for the previous three years, making it eligible for organic status. Hardly any Chinese farmland is left idle. The official who stamped the certificate told her, "I don't know. I don't care. They just asked me to stamp it, so I stamped it."



Let the buyer be aware.





Dennis T. Avery is a senior fellow for Hudson Institute in Washington, D.C. and is the Director for Center for Global Food Issues. He was formerly a senior analyst for the Department of State. Alex A. Avery is the Director of Research at the Hudson Institute's Center for Global Food Issues.





enterstageright.com
 
HHHHHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMM,Could this be another reason for M COOL,I dont think anyone likes their produce fertilized with chinese poop :shock: ...........good luck

PS seriously, every thing that is imported into the USA needs to be identified as to the country of orgin,including beef.
With the threat of terror high,and the uncertainty of some diseases,M COOL should be enacted immediately and our borders secured.
 
Isn't there an association of Organic Producers in the USA? I'm quite certain there is, and that they set standards and also do some, if not all of the policing to assure people follow the rules. I believe the members also have a logo or label for their products. Not that 'furriners and other crooks' couldn't and wouldn't counterfeit such a label and use it on their products!

Surely there also are some consumers who know where to find a lab to test products they buy labelled "organic", and who might just like to find a reason to sue a company with deep pockets!

BTW, maybe the Hudson Institute is trying to change the way food is produced in the USA, but who is going to decide who goes hungry when there isn't enough organic food for the entire population, and they have run the "commodity" producers out of business?

MRJ
 
I thought just awhile ago, the blamers were promoting organic, now they are questioning the approval process.

They will discount all regulations/procedures, and require/demand additional at the same time. More people are starting to discount them as "whiners, blamers, protectionists", and also for what they are.

"Toxic thinkers"!
 
Most blamers just hate change and fight any type of change.

I was talking with a guy last week that said it has been announced that chemical fertilizer would not be made anywhere in North America by 2010.

The idea is that it will be made in South America and shipped via containers.

Most farmers I have mentioned this to don't believe they will ever be in a position where they can't just buy fertilizer at will.
 
There were several ogranic certifiers before USDA got involved.. When USDA got involved they started adding loop holes to the system that a lot of Organic folks didn't like.. Don't know where it stands now to be honest as I found most of the organic statutes to be a bit much but one of the loopholes that really torqued people was if organic feed wasn't readily available at a reasonable cost than regular feed could be substitued or something like that.. Wish I could remember exactly..I think the problem was reasonable could be open for interpretation as could reasonable. This of course is for livestock production.
 
Jason said:
Most blamers just hate change and fight any type of change.

MRJ said:
BTW, maybe the Hudson Institute is trying to change the way food is produced in the USA, but who is going to decide who goes hungry when there isn't enough organic food for the entire population, and they have run the "commodity" producers out of business?

HHHHHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMM..."Toxic thinkers"!
 
HAY MAKER said:
HHHHHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMM,Could this be another reason for M COOL,I dont think anyone likes their produce fertilized with chinese poop :shock: ...........good luck

I truly believe that the US cattle and beef industry lost a great economic opportunity by not having M-COOL in effect right after 9/11...And I think the move toward buying American (when it can be found and is identified) will continue- just like the movement now to get away from dependence on foreign oil- or countries that don't support our war on terrorism efforts...

Just think-- What if the British group had been able to carry out their plot to bring down 11 planes all of which were enroute to the US--Nationalism would be back at its top- but US consumers still would have no way of identifying or buying US beef- either if they were doing it for food safety against terrorism, or as a proud way to support the USA....

There will be more plots- some will succeed-- and nationalism and isolationism against foreign countries will continue to rise....But the US cattle industry will not be able to take advantage of it - we continue to miss the boat because a few multinationals want their access to some cheap beef sources...:(
 
RobertMac said:
Jason said:
Most blamers just hate change and fight any type of change.

MRJ said:
BTW, maybe the Hudson Institute is trying to change the way food is produced in the USA, but who is going to decide who goes hungry when there isn't enough organic food for the entire population, and they have run the "commodity" producers out of business?

HHHHHHHHHHHMMMMMMMMM..."Toxic thinkers"!


RM quote: "Toxic thinkers"...........No, only in your dreams, far from the reality!

I'm making another, somewhat related post, BTW.

MRJ
 

Latest posts

Back
Top