• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Cattle cause two centuries of dust to pollute our air?

Liberty Belle

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
1,818
Location
northwestern South Dakota
I'm still busy in Pierre but after reading this on Tony Dean's website I just had to share it with all of you... after I quit laughing! :lol: I figured that the ranchers on here would especially appreciate knowing that cattle are the cause of so much pollution.

I'm sure you'll agree that this is "sound science" at it's finest but, although I really appreciate the humor Dean has to offer, I sure wish he would invest in a computer with spell check. :roll:

Dust in West Bamed on Grazing

The American West is 600 percent dustier than it was two centuries ago, and the chief reason is the 40 million head of livestock introduced to the arid region in the 19th century, a new report says.

"There seems to be a perception that dusty conditions in the West are just the nature of the region," said CU geology professor Jason Neff, the lead author of the report, which appears in this week's issue of Nature Geoscience. "We have shown here that the increase in dust since the 1800s is a direct result of human activity and not part of the natural system."

Neff and his colleagues examined sediment records from dust blown into alpine lakes in southwest Colorado's San Juan Mountains.

"From about 1860 to 1900, the dust deposition rates shot up so high that we initially thought there was a mistake in our data," said Neff. "But the evidence clearly shows the western U.S. had its own Dust Bowl beginning in the 1800s when the railroads went in and cattle and sheep were introduced into the rangelands."

The study shows that "dust fall" in the West over the past century was five to seven times heavier than at any time over the last 5,000 years," said Neff.

The size and type of the dust particles found in the lakes indicate that most of it came from the American Southwest.

And while droughts can lead to erosion, the study found that droughts the past two centuries have been relatively mild compared with drought over the past 2,000 years.

The conclusion: The increased dustiness coincides with intensive land use, primarily grazing.

Neff said the 40 million head of livestock at the turn of the century caused "a massive and systematic degradation of the ecosystems."

In the arid West, four acres of land can sustain one cow and calf pair; in the lusher southeast, it's the reverse: one acre can sustain about four cow-calf pairs.

The 1934 Taylor Grazing Act imposed restrictions on grazing in the West, and coincided with a decline in dust accumulation rates in the San Juan lake sediments, the study found.

That decrease continues today. Nevertheless, Neff said, "We still probably have four times the amount of dust now" as before settlement of the West.

The big worry in the future is that climate change models forecast more severe droughts for the American Southwest, he said.

"When you have more severe droughts, it's clear you're going to have more dust," Neff said. "We may see more destruction because of longer drought periods."

While dust increased at least fourfold, so did nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium, which are the byproducts of ranching, farming and mining, the authors said.

http://www.tonydean.com/issues2.html?sectionid=9605
 
>>In the arid West, four acres of land can sustain one cow and calf pair; in the lusher southeast, it's the reverse: one acre can sustain about four cow-calf pairs.<<


When they spew out bullcrap like that how can any of the other conclusions be deemed in anyway reliable?

Stupid crap, and probably in some way shape or form funded with tax dollars.
 
Of course he's right! Why hasn't anyone thought of this before??? And here everyone thought it was excess plowing that caused the dust bowl years. :wink: :wink:

Anyone would know that grasslands under permanent cover are far more dusty than cultivated crop land that gets a good stirring up a few times a year. How can anyone possibly think that a four wheel drive tearing around the field with a fifty foot cultivator behind it could make more dust than a cow walking across the pasture. There's no comparison. Those cow feet can really stir things up.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Good Grief!
 
Kato said:
Of course he's right! Why hasn't anyone thought of this before??? And here everyone thought it was excess plowing that caused the dust bowl years. :wink: :wink:

Anyone would know that grasslands under permanent cover are far more dusty than cultivated crop land that gets a good stirring up a few times a year. How can anyone possibly think that a four wheel drive tearing around the field with a fifty foot cultivator behind it could make more dust than a cow walking across the pasture. There's no comparison. Those cow feet can really stir things up.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Good Grief!

Yep- I agree Kato...I sure wasted my time in all those range management and soils classes- when this idiot could have taught me all :roll: :wink: :lol:
 
Ranchers are the ORIGINAL enviromentalists! We put more time, energy, love, sweat, tears and faith in the land we are stewards over than ANY tree-hugging, granola sniffing jack a lope that knows what is best for us and thier planet! :mad: It chaps my hind quarters when they put out PROPAGANDA that is baseless, factless and brainless! :mad: The more i learn about human beings as a whole the more respect i lose for us. We are arrogant and clueless as a species and thats the nicest way i can put it. All some folks need is a CAUSE to blindly follow to bring a microscopic amount of meaning to an otherwise useless and wasted life. Some other folks like the writer of the trash about "cow dust" find thier meaning in throwing out vomit for the first group to absorb and wallow around in until they believe it as fact. We as an industry, as folks who live for our lifestyle, who have this amazing tradition and honored vacation coursing through our veins CANNOT remain silent. When we "let it slide" we will be throwing dirt in our own graves. "To sin by silence when we should protest makes cowards of us all." (Abraham Lincoln) I'll be going back to that jokers website and letting him know what I think. And I will stand up for ranching EVERYTIME anyone questions this industry with honest questions or blatant lies. WILL YOU? :???:
 
Here's what I would do push and level it with a dozer all summer then just before snowfall cover it with tar.
 
Don't ya just love "DEANS DRIVELS". Now there is one guy who never let's facts or common sense get in his way.
 
We know its BS, but we need to realize that lots of well meaning people believe this propaganda. If we do not invest in fighting this we are done. We have to reach someone besides the choir with the truth. Cattlewomen organizations are good at programs like Ag in the Classroom. Cattlemen organizations hire lobbyists to monitor laws, so that we can at least have a chance to fight them. I'll get off my soapbox now :wink:
 
This letter to Tony Dean was posted on his website today and I couldn't resist sharing it with you.

Read Stevens' comments and then notice how Dean signs his answer at the bottom!

The grazing industry? You don't think Dean could be talking about ranchers, do you?

:???: :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Dust in the West Pathectic and so is Tony

The article was about as pathetic as the spelling in the title (dust in the west "bamed"…)

The author needs to rethink affects such as construction, cultivation and the aftermath of range fires.

In all, not much respect for the author, or for you in publishing that nonsense.

L.E. STEVENS


Dear Mr. Stevens: My guess is you're involved with grazing on public lands in the west, or in some way tied to the grazing industry. Am I correct?

Ton7


http://www.tonydean.com/issues2.html?sectionid=9613
 
Liberty Belle said:
This letter to Tony Dean was posted on his website today and I couldn't resist sharing it with you.

Read Stevens' comments and then notice how Dean signs his answer at the bottom!

The grazing industry? You don't think Dean could be talking about ranchers, do you?

:???: :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Dust in the West Pathectic and so is Tony

The article was about as pathetic as the spelling in the title (dust in the west "bamed"…)

The author needs to rethink affects such as construction, cultivation and the aftermath of range fires.

In all, not much respect for the author, or for you in publishing that nonsense.

L.E. STEVENS


Dear Mr. Stevens: My guess is you're involved with grazing on public lands in the west, or in some way tied to the grazing industry. Am I correct?

Ton7


http://www.tonydean.com/issues2.html?sectionid=9613
I don't know...I've always found that L.E Stevens guy to be a bit of a troublemaker :P
 
Tony Dean might have a different attitude if he had ever WORKED for a living.

"There are two spiritual dangers of not owning a farm. One is the danger of supposing that breakfast comes from the grocery, the other is that heat comes from the furnace."
Aldo Leopold Sand County Almanac
 
this study was just about the SW deserts - not everywhere else in the west & if you read closely, it's really about the early part of the 20th century and show that dust is lower now than in the past 100 yrs
 

Latest posts

Back
Top