• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Cheap immigrant labor imposes high costs on U.S. taxpayers

Help Support Ranchers.net:

rancher

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
1,059
Reaction score
0
It is easy to see why illegal immigrants are attractive to employers. These are generally good, hardworking people who will quietly accept minimum wage (or less), who don't generally get health or other benefits, and if they complain they can be easily fired. For some employers it is an abused form of labor. Even minimum wage is attractive to workers from countries whose standard of living is a fraction of ours.


But it is not "cheap labor." It may be "cheap" to those who pay the wages, but for the rest of us it is clearly "subsidized" labor, as we taxpayers pick up the costs of education, health, and other municipal costs imposed by this workforce. That has become a substantial and growing cost as the nature of illegal immigration patterns has changed.


Immense municipal costs


For decades, illegal immigrants were single men who would come up from Mexico or Central America alone, pick crops or perform other low-paid physical labor and then go home. They were indeed "cheap labor." But starting in the 1960s, these workers either brought their families or smuggled them into the country later. They become a permanent or semipermanent population living in the shadows but imposing immense municipal costs.


Illegal immigration today isn't "cheap" labor, except to the employer. To the rest of us it is "subsidized labor," where a few get the benefit and the rest of us pay. These costs ought to be obvious to all, but the myth of "cheap labor" and "jobs Americans won't do" persists.


It is hard to get an exact profile of the people who live in the underground economy, but the average family of illegal immigrants has two to four school-age kids. It costs U.S. taxpayers more than $7,000 a child just to educate them in our public schools. Now no minimum-wage workers, or even low-wage workers, pay anywhere near enough in taxes to pay for even one child in school. Even if their parents were paying all federal and state taxes, Colorado's estimated 30,000 school-age children of workers illegally in the U.S. impose gargantuan costs on other taxpayers.


Paying 'off the books'


The dilemma is compounded by the fact that approximately 50 percent of illegal workers are paid in cash, off the books. Go to any construction site almost anywhere in America, and you will find workers paid cash wages. Virtually every city in America has an area where illegals gather and people come by to get "cheap" cash-wage labor.


The health care cost of this "cheap" workforce is also significant and subsidized by U.S. taxpayers. The total cost of this "subsidized" labor is impossible to ascertain and difficult to even estimate, but it is immense and growing as our population of these workers grows. A few benefit, many pay.


Americans pay in more ways than taxes. Cheap labor drives down wages as low-income Americans are forced to compete against these admittedly hardworking people. Even employers who don't want to wink at false documents are forced to lower wages just to be competitive. In many ways it is a "race to the bottom," fueled by poor people often recruited from ever-more-distant countries by middlemen who profit handsomely.


Professor George Borjas of Harvard, an immigrant himself, estimates that American workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market from newcomers.


Let me suggest that correctly analyzed, the fight against illegal immigration is both a liberal and conservative cause. There is no moral or legal justification for this abused form of labor.


Richard D. Lamm is co-director of the Institute for Public Policy Studies and a professor at the University of Denver. He is a member of the Board of the Federation for American Immigration Reform. He served three terms as governor of Colorado. E-mail Dick Lamm at [email protected]
 

ranchwife

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,990
Reaction score
0
Location
ennis, montana
rancher---i worked as a nurse in a state prison (will not mention which one, just suffice to say not montana's) and i was amazed at the number of illegal immigrants also housed (at tax payer expense) in our prisons!!! conviceted felons are subject to free healthcare, free dental, free medications and free surgery if necessary...not to mention 3 square meals a day and t.v.....many things that hardworking taxpayers cannot themselves afford!! when a person is incarcerated, they are considered "indigent" and therefore their families get "benefits"...more at the expense of the taxpayer!! how sad!! i for one am tired of taking care of those who simply will not take care of themselves...LEGALLY!!!!
 

mrj

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
4,609
Reaction score
1
Location
SD
Does anyone posting here know what the bottom end of the wage scale at a packing plant is?

How much would the packer have to pay in wages to be "fair" to the worker?

How much of that increase will the packer balance by cutting prices paid for cattle?

I do not like illegal immigration any better than anyone else, yet am also realistic about who is going to pay the direct, as well as the indirect costs, of a government mandate to pay higher wages (aka increasing minimum wage).

What is the agenda of The Institute for Public Policies?

MRJ
 

rancher

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
1,059
Reaction score
0
MRJ said:
Does anyone posting here know what the bottom end of the wage scale at a packing plant is?

How much would the packer have to pay in wages to be "fair" to the worker?

How much of that increase will the packer balance by cutting prices paid for cattle? Don't you think all the expense the tax payer pays for these illegal workers would save you more than taking a little less for your beef.

I do not like illegal immigration any better than anyone else, yet am also realistic about who is going to pay the direct, as well as the indirect costs, of a government mandate to pay higher wages (aka increasing minimum wage).

What is the agenda of The Institute for Public Policies? Does everyone have an agenda?

MRJ
 

Cal

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
3,598
Reaction score
0
Location
Southern SD
There needs to be stricter enforcement of the border, along with a geust worker program, such as the one used with South African workers. Migrant labor is a key part to many labor intensive industries besides agriculture, such as construction and motel, but needs effective regulation. Workers need to be screened and allowed to return to Mexico and legally re-enter the US.

IMO eliminating the migrant work force would have a similar negative effect on the economy as isolationism.
 

Latest posts

Top