• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Chew on this: Grazers tackle global warming

Big Muddy rancher

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
22,810
Location
Big Muddy valley
Chew on this: Grazers tackle global warming
Associated Press

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Advertisement

CHERSKY, Russia (AP) — Wild horses have returned to northern Siberia. So have musk oxen, hairy beasts that once shared this icy land with woolly mammoths and saber-toothed cats. Moose and reindeer are here, and might one day be joined by Canadian bison and deer.

Later, the predators will come — Siberian tigers, wolves and possibly leopards.

Russian scientist Sergey Zimov is reintroducing these animals to the land where they once roamed in millions to demonstrate his theory that filling the vast emptiness of Siberia with grass-eating animals can slow global warming.

"Some people have a small garden. I have an ice age park. It's my hobby," says Zimov, smiling through his graying beard. His true profession is quantum physics.

Climate change is felt most sharply in the Arctic, where temperatures are warming faster than anywhere else on the planet. Most climate scientists say human activity, especially industrial pollution and the byproducts of everyday living like home heating and driving cars, is triggering an unnatural warming of the Earth. Tomorrow, negotiators representing 194 countries open a two-week conference in Cancun, Mexico, on reducing greenhouse gases to slow the pace of climate change.

Zimov is trying to recreate an ecosystem that disappeared 10,000 years ago with the end of the ice age, which closed the 1.8 million-year Pleistocene era and ushered in the global climate roughly as we know it.

He believes herds of grazers will turn the tundra, which today supports only spindly larch trees and shrubs, into luxurious grasslands. Tall grasses with complex root systems will stabilize the frozen soil, which is now thawing at an ever-increasing rate, he says.

Herbivores keep wild grass short and healthy, sending up fresh shoots through the summer and autumn. Their manure gives crucial nourishment. In winter, the animals trample and flatten the snow that otherwise would insulate the ground from the cold air. That helps prevent the frozen ground, or permafrost, from thawing and releasing powerful greenhouse gases. Grass also reflects more sunlight than forests, a further damper to global warming.

It would take millions of animals to change the landscape of Siberia and effectively seal the permafrost. But left alone, Zimov argues, the likes of caribou, buffalo and musk oxen multiply quickly. Wherever they graze "new pastures will appear ... beautiful grassland."

The project is being watched not only by climate scientists but by paleontologists and environmentalists who have an interest in "rewilding."

"This is a very interesting experiment," said Adrian Lister, of the Natural History Museum in London. "I think it's valid from an ecological point of view to put back animals that did formerly live there," he told AP Television News. He disapproved of suggestions to rewild nonnative species — for example, relocating elephants and rhinos to the American plains.

Zimov began the project in 1989, fencing off 40,000 acres of forest, meadows, shrub land and lakes. It is surrounded by another 150,000 acres of wilderness.

It is an offshoot of the Northeast Science Station, which he founded and where he has lived for 30 years. Already icebound by October, the park is 25 miles inland from the station, accessible only by boat in summer and by snow vehicles after the rivers freeze.

A 105-foot tower inside the park gives constant readings of methane, carbon dioxide and water vapor. The data feeds into a global monitoring system overseen by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Zimov's research on permafrost, greenhouse gas emissions and mammoth archaeology has attracted world scientists to his laboratories, a small cluster of cabins and a tiny chapel on a rocky bluff above a channel of the Kolyma River. A 20-bed barge is used for field trips in summer, and a $100,000 hovercraft is on order. Zimov sometimes uses an old Russian tank to bring supplies from the Chinese border, 1,200 miles away.

Part of the station's attraction — and deterrence — is its remoteness. It is 4,000 miles and eight time zones east of Moscow. The nearby town of Chersky, with some 5,000 people, has few amenities, and the nearest city, Yakutsk, is a 4½-hour flight. Many researchers, particularly Americans, prefer to work in Alaska or northern Canada, which are more accessible.

"Most of the Arctic is in Russia, and yet most of the Arctic research isn't," said Max Holmes, the director of the Polaris Project at Woods Hole Research Center in Massachusetts, which has sent undergraduates to the station for the last three summers.

Zimov started the park with a herd of 40 Yakutian horses, a semi-wild breed with a handsomely long mane that is raised by Yakuts and other native people for their meat. Short, sturdy and broad-backed, they survive harsh Siberian winters with the help of a furry hide, thick layers of fat and the ability to paw through 3 feet of snow to forage.

Of his first herd, Zimov said 15 were killed by wolves and bears, 12 died from eating wild hemlock that grows in the park, and two slipped through the perimeter and made their way back some 600 miles to their original pastures.
 
CHERSKY, Russia (AP) — Wild horses have returned to northern Siberia,...

Zimov started the park with a herd of 40 Yakutian horses, a semi-wild breed

Of his first herd, Zimov said 15 were killed by wolves and bears, 12 died from eating wild hemlock that grows in the park, and two slipped through the perimeter and made their way back some 600 miles to their original pastures.

that would leave 11 horses?

not to be overly critical... but at that rate... re population will take awhile..

when I read articles such as this ,the only thought is,.. are scientists really that stupid?
 
And how clever are you? Do you really think he's cruising with the tank across Siberian tundra on a daily basis with the top down trying to pick up........musk ox?

Give your head a shake. Why would you criticize the death loss of the horses also?? Do you think there aren't similar numbers lost in natural ecosystems with deer, elk, caribou and musk ox? How do you know?? This is one of those times where you're better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you're dumb, rather than opening it and removing all doubt.

It sounds like a fascinating experiment, and whenever they have data to share with the public I'll be curious to see it.
 
"In winter, the animals trample and flatten the snow that otherwise would insulate the ground from the cold air. That helps prevent the frozen ground, or permafrost, from thawing and releasing powerful greenhouse gases"

So the animals are going to walk around until all of the snow in the artic is packed down? Wow! We are going to need to rethink legalizing marijuana so this might make sense.

And the "snow" is causing the global warming. Stupid snow!

I think it is funny how global warming is not mentioned very much in January and February.
 
While I applaud the concept I am afraid this experiment is probably going to have to continue well beyond our lifetime to get measurable change.

At the best it will show that grazers contribute to healthy ecosystems. :D
 
It would take millions of animals to change the landscape of Siberia and effectively seal the permafrost. But left alone, Zimov argues, the likes of caribou, buffalo and musk oxen multiply quickly. Wherever they graze "new pastures will appear ... beautiful grassland."

The project is being watched not only by climate scientists but by paleontologists and environmentalists who have an interest in "rewilding."

Yet, millions of animals in "captivity" are greenhouse gas producers
icon_rubbingchin.gif
 
PureCountry said:
And how clever are you? Do you really think he's cruising with the tank across Siberian tundra on a daily basis with the top down trying to pick up........musk ox?

Give your head a shake. Why would you criticize the death loss of the horses also?? Do you think there aren't similar numbers lost in natural ecosystems with deer, elk, caribou and musk ox? How do you know?? This is one of those times where you're better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you're dumb, rather than opening it and removing all doubt.

It sounds like a fascinating experiment, and whenever they have data to share with the public I'll be curious to see it.


gee and I didn't even get to the $100,000 hovercraft which is on order or the fencing of 40,000 acres...

as for the horses.. the sob with a phd in physics should be horsewhipped for just dropping them off and hoping they survive.. which they didn't...

the idea of grazing seems like a good idea... but this shows his experiment is more of a "fantasy" then a real plan...

a person with a plan would not just dump them off and marvel at how great his plan was when most died..

but feel free to get pissed at me while you defend the person who killed 72.9% of his herd...
 
Back in the 60's a irrigation canal was dug across sandhills south of Valentine. For a few years the deer would try to swim the canal and drown. The survivors learned to stay away from it, and now that is now a problem. The horses will also learn to survive their new habitat.
 
PureCountry said:
Steve said:
a person with a plan would not just dump them off and marvel at how great his plan was when most died..

How else would you reintroduce animals to an ecosystem? Plumb in water bowls and haul in feed just in case?


simple measures could have been taken to "introduce" them and allow them to acclimate to the harsher climate..

in harsh country, you build wind breaks, and bring cattle back to give them a chance... I am sure some would survive if left alone.. but why not at least try to increase the odds..

sadly in years to come his "research" will be reviewed and used to say if the "plan" worked or not... and further work and research will hinge upon it..

quite simply... it seems a great idea... doomed because no one will say it has poor planning...

wouldn't it be better to have criticism in the early stage instead of high reviews of his fantasy so that changes could be made so there might have a different better result?
 
Martin Jr. said:
Back in the 60's a irrigation canal was dug across sandhills south of Valentine. For a few years the deer would try to swim the canal and drown. The survivors learned to stay away from it, and now that is now a problem. The horses will also learn to survive their new habitat.

the deer population is estimated between 300,000 and 350,000 in Nebraska

I am sure with those numbers it is easy to let them learn... but with 40 semi tame horses why not at least acclimate them first, before dooming your research on such an important issue?
 
On the larger picture, out of curiosity has everyone bought into the idea that global warming is legit?

Remember when the ozone was getting a larger hole in it, and then they realized that as the earth rotates, the whole changes in size due to the effect of the position of the (it shrinks and increases each year). However, you still heard how we were hurting the ozone layer for forever. I have spent a lot of time learning from an idividual that studied in the very lab that discovered ozone.

If you haven't informed yourself about the holes in the global warming theory, it would be a very responsible thing to do. The computer generated model used was rediculous. It had a rainforest in the mohave desert among many other manipulated data to get the results. Its surprising how scientific critics loose governmental funding, and who else is funding this kind of research. Our local meteorologist has been commenting on this the last several years about how he doesn't see an increase in temperature. Its nice to see this for once.

I've learned to follow the money trail in life. If global warming exists and is caused by excessive carbon emissions, then we should limit its emission. Who stands to gain significantly from carbon credits (bank)- the man spending the most time spouting its evils. Al Gore and other associates. And so you know, I am not bashing a political party. I am pretty middle of the road.

My point- maybe we should spend a little money actually verifying the facts that the world is heating up first, second that it is not a natural phenomenon like the ice age ending before we existed, and third that limiting carbon emissions is effective in changing a course that needs to be changed. Otherwise, all the money spent on any of these projects like the one above is a waste of time.
 
I am no scientist, but haven't we been having global warming since the last ice age? The experiment sounds interesting, but like someone said earlier, I don't think anything could be proven in our lifetime. A lot of what I have read says that sunspots are more to blame than anything for the weather in a given year. If it is truly do to carbon emissions, why don't they outlaw soda pop with all those little bubbles of co2? I heard a comedian the other night give an opinion on this, and he can't possibly be any dumber than Al Gore. He said, "Blaming global warming on people and not the sun is like blaming the bread when the toast gets burnt".
 
15 were killed by wolves and bears, 12 died from eating wild hemlock that grows in the park,

and two went back to their natural grazing pastures.. 600 miles away..

Northern Rancher said:
What do they have to learn-tame horses winter out with timberwolves up here all the time. a horse winters way easier than a cow.

your horses are not getting used to the scarce grazing and new predators over a harsh winter..

clearly he didn't plan on the animals eating the abundant hemlock... but absent their natural grazing.. with no planning most died.. a painful needless death..

with a little planning his results could have been better...


My criticism was not so much towards the horses... but the lack of any plan... or one which at least has a chance to work..

criticism is important.. and is easier to accept before the results are etched in stone...
 
But he bought more. Now the horses have learned to avoid poisonous plants and to resist predators. Over the last three years, more colts were born and survived than horses lost.

The challenge is to find the right balance between grazers and predators, and how to help his animals get through their first winters.

His workers still give occasional buckets of grain to the horses to supplement their diet with salt. About half the horses come regularly to the cabin where a caretaker stays year-round. The other half are rarely seen except for their tracks.

Zimov also has had problems with the moose that he brought inside his enclosure. Moose still live in small numbers in surrounding forests, and the males jump back and forth over the 6-foot-high fence.

In September he traveled to a nature reserve on Wrangel Island, about five hours by boat across the East Siberia Sea, and brought back six 4-month-old musk oxen. One died a few weeks later. The others are kept in a small enclosure and fed hay until they can fend for themselves.

Today he has 70 animals in the park. He wants thousands to restock Siberia. To bring 1,000 bison from North America would cost $1 million, Zimov says, a small price to pay.

'What's $1 million?'

well at least he is learning... a little care goes along way... but the initial cost was steep.. and by the number of 70 animals left.. it appears his results were less then 50%...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top