• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

COOL provisions seen as positive

OldDog/NewTricks

Well-known member
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
3,443
Location
The Dam End of Silicon Valley
Legal/Regulatory News
House passes Farm Bill, COOL provisions seen as positive

By Janie Gabbett on 7/30/2007 for Meatingplace.com

The U.S. House of Representatives Friday passed a version of the 2007 Farm Bill the White House has threatened to veto, but many meat industry groups say a mandatory country-of-origin labeling provision included in the legislation is moving in the right direction.

The 231-191 vote was largely along party lines and without the support needed to override a veto, though the bill has a long way to go. The Senate is expected to start on its version of the legislation in September.

The National Cattlemen's Beef Association gave the bill a mixed review overall, but called the modest fixes to COOL an improvement over the 2002 COOL provisions, which were never implemented and are set to expire September 30. NCBA said the House version alleviates most of the record-keeping burden for cattle producers and addresses the dilemma of labeling ground beef by allowing language that indicates whether it is from it from mixed or multiple origins.

"The fixes in the Farm Bill certainly don't repair all of the problems in the COOL law, but we've come a long way toward making it more workable for our cattlemen," NCBA's Executive Director of Legislative Affairs Colin Woodall Woodall said in a statement.

The National Pork Producers Council said the House bill would help pork producers remain competitive in the global marketplace and cheered what it called, "much-needed fixes" to COOL provisions.

Last week both Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns and American Meat Institute President and CEO J. Patrick Boyle said the House COOL provisions were moving in the right direction.

The House COOL provisions create three categories of labeling: one that indicates product was born, raised and slaughtered in the United States; one that indicates product was not exclusively born, raised and slaughtered in the U.S.; and one that includes products entirely derived from foreign countries. Ground meat product can be labeled with a list of countries where product may have originated.
 
I'm not going to turn this into the bull session, but for NCBA, NPPC, AMI, and Johanns to praise the fix in COOL is, to say the least, disingenuous. The same fixes could have been had in 2002.
 
RobertMac said:
I'm not going to turn this into the bull session, but for NCBA, NPPC, AMI, and Johanns to praise the fix in COOL is, to say the least, disingenuous. The same fixes could have been had in 2002.

Too bad it takes 92% of the producers and consumers telling them they want it before they even open their ears
:shock: :roll: :( :( :mad:


Consumers Reports Survey of US Consumers Pub July 10, 2007:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. consumers overwhelmingly support stricter food labeling laws, with 92 percent of Americans wanting to know which country produced the food they are buying, a consumer magazine said on Tuesday.


USDA poll of Checkoff Payers- Jan 25, 2007 :
WASHINGTON, Jan. 25, 2007 - Today, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced the results of the Beef Checkoff Survey, which was conducted recently among beef, dairy, and veal producers nationwide.


Ninety-two (92) percent of those surveyed would strongly agree or somewhat agree that "if it were possible, all or at least some portion of the Beef Checkoff dollars should be used to promote only U.S. born and raised beef." Currently, the program promotes beef, in general, and importers also pay into the program at $1-per-head on live animal imports and a $1-per-head equivalent on beef products. Even if promoting only U.S. born and raised beef meant canceling the checkoff assessment on imported beef and beef products, 75.4 percent of the survey respondents still strongly or somewhat agree that a portion of the checkoff dollars should be used to promote only U.S. beef. Currently, about $8 million or 10 percent of the total assessments collected comes from imports.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top