• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Country of Origin Labeling

Help Support Ranchers.net:

It made the national news in Canada- yesterday the US federeal government announced it will delay implemantation of M-COOL until at least 2009 at the earliest. What does this mean for UTM canadian feeder cattle, some that are grandfathered as US beef and had to be in the US by jan 08 to still be considered as US beef. what is the date now? I Guess more quality US born raised and slaughtered beef must be need for the stockpile in the freezers with M-COOL coming in ( so fill'em with that good canadian born US beef :lol2: :oops: Will M-COOL ever be a reality? :roll: Another example of well spent money by R-CALF. :oops: :oops: :oops: SH and OT why so quiet on M-COOL being moved back? :oops: :oops: :p :p :p
 
Kato said:
Where did you hear this? I didn't listen to the news yesterday.

Kato-- the Congress has been talking about postponing the date to some date in 09 -since it may be sometime before the Farm Bill is signed-to give the packers/retailers/etal more time to set up for it...
Nothing official yet that I know of...

Which is kind of aline of BS- since they've had since 02 to know its coming....
 
2/8/2008

Congress Ponders COOL Delay: House Ag Committee Chairman Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) told the Wall Street Journal this week that the law to implement mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) may be postponed due to the delay in finalizing a new Farm Bill.



Language in both the House and Senate versions of the 2007 Farm Bill makes some much-needed adjustments to the mandatory COOL law scheduled to be implemented in September of this year. USDA's rulemaking process can't begin until provisions to the COOL law are finalized, and there may not be enough time to go through an appropriate rulemaking and implementation process. Peterson says the continued delays may push back implementation of COOL to January 2009.
 
Hey kato on ctv.news net. MCOOL delayed to JAN 2009 at a min. Debate it hard but some expect Bush to veto the farm bill if that happens they have to draft a new farm bill then it has to pass again . Basically there will be no COOL for a while.
 
QUESTION said:
Hey kato on ctv.news net. MCOOL delayed to JAN 2009 at a min. Debate it hard but some expect Bush to veto the farm bill if that happens they have to draft a new farm bill then it has to pass again . Basically there will be no COOL for a while.

If he vetoes it- then the 2002 law goes into effect in Sept..
 
Yes , you are right Oldtimer , The veto will make it Tough On Records. Everyone needs to keep records now as if the veto happens .
 
PORKER said:
Yes , you are right Oldtimer , The veto will make it Tough On Records. Everyone needs to keep records now as if the veto happens .
Got them for the past 40+ years...Bring er on!!!!!!
 
Feds on pace to miss food labeling deadline
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is moving too slowly to meet a Sept. 30 deadline for labeling food by country of origin, according to Rosa DeLauro, chairwoman of the House panel that sets farm-program spending. "There continues to be foot-dragging," the Connecticut Democrat told Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer at a hearing in Washington. Schafer was testifying Wednesday before Congress for the first time since his confirmation. Country-of-origin labeling for meat products was required in the farm bill passed in 2002.

Detroit News staff, wire and Bloomberg News reports.

posted today.
 
Rosa DeLauro, should remind everyone that they had fair warning with the COOL law passed in 2002. The last delay was so that everyone would have time to be set up to do COOL. That's why they agreed to the September 30 2008 start date. At that time Congress told the fish and shellfish industry they had 6 months ,just about everyone was ready in 1 month.
 
Country of Origin Labeling (COOL)
Mark Whitney on 14 Jan 2008

On May 13th, 2002, then-President Bush signed into law the 2002 Farm Bill that included a new requirement for country of origin labeling (COOL) for beef, lamb, pork, fish, perishable ag commodities and peanuts. Originally slated to be in effect by the end of September 2004, enacting of the COOL law has twice been delayed (with the exception of farm-raised and wild fish and shellfish) but is now due to be carried out beginning midnight September 30th of 2008. Unlike the last two rounds, initial indications are that COOL will not be delayed, and instead will become a reality come next fall. Up until this point, voluntary guidelines have been in effect, with participation not required for livestock, packing or retailing industries.

The COOL issue has been the topic of much debate. Concerns over foreign animal diseases, including avian flu, BSE, and a variety of food safety issues with food products imported from China have really pushed the COOL issue into the spotlight. Proponents argue that COOL is necessary to enhance the security of our nation's food supply, and is needed to allow consumers to choose U.S. products if they so choose. Detractors feel that requiring COOL will greatly increase costs throughout the food chain and will ultimately weaken U.S. meat production and sales due to increased verification and paperwork requirements.

Regardless of whether livestock producers are for or against COOL, they should begin making preparations for its implementation this upcoming fall. Individuals should begin communicating with their packers to determine if the packers will have any requirements or if their will be any contract ramifications. In the case of imported products, the food label will have to indicate where it started, was grown/raised and processed. For example, a meat label for pork might read, "From hogs born in Canada, raised and slaughtered in the United States." Therefore, producers considering purchasing isoweans from Canada need to ensure first and foremost that their packer will be willing to take them once they reach market weight. Even if you are purchasing isoweans or other age/size pigs that are U.S. born, you should begin insisting on records or receipts from the seller of the animals that will then serve as proof of origin. Keep abreast to what is going on at the House and Senate level concerning ratification and/or implementation of COOL, and ensure you are prepared should the proposed law become a reality, which it appears it will.
Mark Whitney

NEWS FLASH
Appropriations Hearings: The House Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture held a hearing on February 13th to review the Fiscal Year 2009 budget for the Department of Agriculture. Secretary of Agriculture Ed Schafer and Deputy Secretary Chuck Conner testified.

A top priority for Subcommittee Chair Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) is timely implementation of mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL). Schafer and Conner assured her that USDA was focused on implementing COOL on September 30, 2008


Also;Country-of-Origin Labeling. Section 10816 of the 2002 farm bill (P.L. 107-
171) requires many retailers to provide country-of-origin information on a number
of raw products, including fresh and ground beef, pork, and lamb (produce, seafood,
and peanuts
also are covered). USDA was to implement the requirement by
September 30, 2004; until then COOL was voluntary. However, the consolidated
FY2004 omnibus appropriation (P.L. 108-199, H.Rept. 108-401) postpones
mandatory COOL for two years for all covered commodities, except farmed fish and
wild fish, to September 30, 2006. Under the COOL law, meats labeled as U.S. origin
must come from animals that are born, raised, and slaughtered in the United States.

The COOL law prohibits USDA from establishing a mandatory ID system to verify
country of origin, but it does permit USDA to require persons supplying covered
commodities to maintain a "verifiable audit trail" to document compliance.
Some
analysts have concluded, therefore, that COOL could spur efforts to trace red meats
back to the processors.
 
NEWS FLASH
Appropriations Hearings: The House Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture held a hearing on February 13th to review the Fiscal Year 2009 budget for the Department of Agriculture. Secretary of Agriculture Ed Schafer and Deputy Secretary Chuck Conner testified.

A top priority for Subcommittee Chair Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) is timely implementation of mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL). Schafer and Conner assured her that USDA was focused on implementing COOL on September 30, 2008 .

In other words,get ready as Secretary of Agriculture Ed Schafer and Deputy Secretary Chuck Conner testified at the hearing that COOL will happen on September 30, 2008 . They won't commint perjury ,so it's the whole truth,or subornation of perjury.
 
Just some of the legal terms being tossed around for COOL

Corporate Meat & (Your Company's name) Inc.* * * * *I, ________________________, on behalf of the
undersigned company ("Supplier"), being duly authorized, hereby agree that Supplier shall provide
( Your Company Inc.) with the information described above, including the following: (a) a Country of
Origin/Method of Production (CoO/MoP)declaration on every consumer package or a separate record of
CoO/MoP with un-packaged,bulk product; and (b) a CoO/MoP declaration on the shipping documents, and
direct store delivery invoice, and Supplier hereby certifies and guarantees that all information so provided
shall be complete and accurate for audit. In addition, Supplier shall (1) maintain records necessary to support
a verifiable audit trail like ScoringAg SSI-EID code; (2) indemnify (Your Company) for any fines, penalties and any other liabilities and
costs that (Your Company) may incur arising out of, or related to, or as a result of theCoO/MoP that you
provide or fail to provide; (3) segregate all covered commodities; and (4)provide (Your Company) with the
results of a third-party audit(s) if so requested._________________________________________________________________________
Date
Company
name (type or print)By: _____________________________________
Its: _____________________________________
Title of Authorized Signatory_______________________________
Address: _________________________________
COOL Contact (type or print)________________________________________________________________
TitleTelephone: (_______) _____________________Appendix A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EACH CASE/SHIPPING UNIT FOR THE ABOVE PRODUCTS AND THAT THE EXTERIORS OF ALL CASES/SHIPPING
UNITS REFLECT (Your Company) PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER AND/OR DIRECT STORE DELIVERY INVOICE NUMBER.
WITHIN EACH CASE/SHIPPING UNIT THERE IS A MINIMUM OF TWO SCORINGAG PLACARDS PER FIVE NET WEIGHT POUNDS
DOCUMENTING THE METHOD OF PRODUCTION AND/OR COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION, (US)
 
I have been watching the discussions on COOL and would like to straighten out some misconseptions on the law going into effect this September 30 at midnight 2008.

COOL has nothing to do with NAIS.
COOL has nothing to do with Premises codes
The Government cannot require a standard formated numbering code system such as a RFID tag starting with 840000000000000
COOL has nothing to do with signing up in your State NAIS ID

COOL gives the producer the right to have his final product listed in a retail store shelf with a US.origin label that says this portion of beef and/or other meats was born ,raised, and processed in the USA. The law requires that the Grocery display a placard of US origin. The law also says that the grocery has the right to audit or be audited to prove source verification . You can call us at ScoringAg 941-792-6405 for info.
 
Hmmm,
Funny how all those fish get processed and labeled by COL and there wasn't all this hype. I wonder why it is so much with beef?
 
Retailers have the easy job of dealing with COOL...all meat packaged for resale comes to their store with a label on it...sell it with that label on the package or, if they repackage the meat, just transfer the original information. All this hue and cry from the retail sector is just a bunch of bull hooey!!!!
 
Labeling


Sunday, February 24, 2008 12:32 AM CST

COOL is good

for the Delta

Catfish consumers, and in Mississippi that's just about everybody, should thank Delta legislator Rep. Linda Whittington for her efforts to require country of origin labeling for catfish not produced in the United States.

Whittington's bill made it out of the House Agriculture Committee on Tuesday and headed to the House floor. The bill requires restaurants to either have a sign posted stating that the catfish served there is U.S. farm-raised catfish or, if the restaurant serves imported catfish, it must state on its menu which country the catfish was grown and processed in.

There have been growing concerns over the last couple of years about catfish imported from China, Vietnam and Cambodia. The poor water quality where catfish are grown prompts growers in those countires to use antibiotics in production, but some of those drugs are not approved for use in the United States.



Growers in the United States follow stricter standards than catfish producers in Asia, Whittington said, and U.S. consumers should know what they're getting when they eat catfish at a restaurant. Grocery stores already are required to label catfish products with country of origin, and we believe that no less should be expected of Mississippi restaurants.

Mississippi catfish growers have taken a huge financial hit from the import of catfish products, according to statistics from U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Sales by catfish growers in the United States were down by 8 percent in 2007, and industry experts claim this is due to cheaper imported fish. Whittington's bill protects not only consumers but producers by forcing restaurants to let customers know where they are getting their catfish.

If the bill passes, restaurants and other businesses that sell catfish directly to the public can still purchase imported catfish, they'll just have to let customers know about it.

We urge all Mississippi lawmakers to vote for this bill.
 

Latest posts

Top