• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Damned if you Do- Damned if you Don't

Help Support Ranchers.net:

A

Anonymous

Guest
Another article on the continuing brucellosis saga....I thought the part about our "not userfriendly USDA" was interesting...They got you coming or going... :roll: :(

Loss of herd to brucellosis test leaves couple reeling
'It's just a sinking feeling in the pit of your stomach,' Bridger rancher says
By JAN FALSTAD
Of The Gazette Staff

BRIDGER - Leaning slightly against a gusty, chilled north wind, Jim and Sandy Morgan surveyed their ranch south of Bridger.

The heavy-seeded grass was tall enough to wave in the wind. Reservoirs that were ringed with caked mud last summer were now brimming with spring rainwater. Plump Black Angus cows munched clover, calves in tow.

The Morgans' 7-month-old son, Jake, snoozed inside the house on his grandma's lap.

Jim grinned tightly and quipped, "I guess we won just the wrong lottery." The Morgans spent 10 days in early May gathering and matching cows to their rightful calves and riding a full day with six relatives to trail 300 cows to summer pasture.

They had just finished when Brent Thompson, the Billings-based veterinarian for the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), called on May 11. A cow from their herd had tested positive for brucellosis. Disbelief was Sandy Morgan's reaction.

"It's just a sinking feeling in the pit of your stomach, and we didn't understand all the ramifications," she said. "We didn't understand that the whole herd could be eliminated because of one cow."

They had to saddle up and spend four more days gathering their cattle from the rugged hills and moving them down to the home ranch for testing.

"It was hot, and those poor little calves - their tongues were hanging out," said Mary Heller, a ranch hand who dates Jim's brother, Steve Morgan.

Thompson and other veterinarians drew blood from the vein under the cows' tails, and six more cows tested positive.

The news hit May 18: Montana had brucellosis.

The bacterial disease imported from Europe a century ago can cause abortions in cows, elk, bison and hogs. Brucellosis is so feared that Thompson said there is only one hard rule to protect the nation's herds.

"A state is allowed one positive herd per year, and that herd must be depopulated," he said.

So the Morgans' cows are quarantined at the home ranch up Pryor Creek Mountain Road under mountains coated in a shawl of snow.

Their cows must be slaughtered by July 6 or the state will lose its brucellosis-free status. That will cost most of the state's ranchers months, even years, of paying for brucellosis testing and will cut into sales of Montana's world-class breeding stock.

Montana gets to keep its brucellosis-free status, for now. But if even one more animal from a separate herd tests positive, all bets are off. The tension will drag on for weeks as the extensive investigation tries to find all the cattle that may have been exposed.

It's reflected in the grim faces of the normally happy-go-lucky Morgans and of Bridger-area veterinarian Ray Randall.

"It seems like a radical thing to do to take that whole herd to slaughter, but there's no choice," said Randall, who said he supports the intensive investigation.

"It's really easy to bleed 1,000 cows and wonder why you did it rather than miss one cow," he said. "You don't want to go there."

Last week, North Dakota ordered most Montana cattle to be tested before entering that state. If Montana loses its "free brucellosis pass," local vets will be drawing blood from all export cattle of breeding age until the state goes 12 months without a positive test.

On Friday, the testing continued on cattle that may have been exposed to Jim Morgan's herd.

Steve Morgan leases land from his brother, and blood was drawn from his 45 cows. That was also the case with another 45 at a neighbor's spread. Results won't come back from the Montana State Laboratory in Bozeman until at least the middle of next week because of the holiday weekend.

Cattle on seven other neighboring ranches also will be tested when Thompson and the other veterinarians resume work after Memorial Day.

"We're going to try to get on to everybody as soon as we can," Thompson said.

The herd owned by Sandy's father, Republican state Rep. Bruce Malcolm from Emigrant, tested clean this week. Malcolm sells bred heifers, and over the past few years, he and his wife, Connie, have trucked cows to their daughter's ranch near Bridger.

Malcolm's herd at Emigrant initially was considered the source ranch, especially because of its proximity to Yellowstone National Park, where wandering elk and bison are prone to carry brucellosis.

While visiting his family near Bridger on Friday, Malcolm told the federal veterinarians that because his herd is fine, there should be no reason for more tests in Paradise Valley.

"My place is clear, and that's far enough," Malcolm said. "You don't need to bother my neighbors."

Don Otto, a federal veterinarian from Iowa who happened to be traveling through Montana and who had time to help out, disagreed. He has been down this road in his home state, he said, and it's crucial that all potentially exposed cattle be tested.

"There's a lot of pain, a lot of pain," Otto said. "But the loss of that status is going to cost Montana ranchers a lot of money."

Brucellosis is spread by animals who lick or ingest aborted fetuses or come into contact with infected reproductive tissues or fluids. It's a disease that affects breeding animals 18 months or older.

Neither APHIS nor the Morgans know the source yet.

However, in recent years, a herd of about 200 elk was hanging around Belfry and Bridger until two special hunts cut its numbers.

"Before those damage hunts, you could walk out to the road and see them come off the hills and go back after eating a belly full of corn," Jim Morgan said.

He wonders if those elk may have wandered out of the park, down the Meeteetse Trail, down Line Creek and carried brucellosis to the Bridger country. Or maybe it came from other cattle.

Jim and Sandy wonder how to negotiate a fair price with APHIS for spring-weight calves that normally would be sold in the fall, when they would bring twice the money. They wonder how to buy replacement cattle in a tight market when prices are at near-record highs.

And Sandy is having trouble grasping the loss of genetics that her namesake and grandfather, Alex Sandy Malcolm, started 65 years ago.

"You spend years weeding out the cows who don't do well in this country and breeding the best and working hard and then the phone rings and it all changes," she said. "It's just like going to a funeral before it happens."

The Morgans have 110 cows running on other land that will be tested. If those come back negative, the cows will form the nucleus of another herd. They are also buying 40 more heifers from Malcolm. Still, they estimate it may take at least four years to rebuild.

"If you keep the heifers, it's two years before they can raise a calf, so it's a time-consuming project," Jim Morgan said.

And there's one more box canyon in the Morgans' lives.

For the past year, they've negotiated a loan to refinance their ranch through a local bank. The note would be guaranteed by Farm Credit Services, part of the USDA.

The good news came two weeks ago.

"We'd been approved and, finally, we could breathe a sigh of relief," Sandy said.

Then the USDA officer heard about the brucellosis tests and called the Morgan's banker to say, "I might have to pull my horns in on their loan."

So the agency that is forcing the slaughter of their 300 cows, even for a just cause, may be denying them the loan they need.

"Every rancher runs on a tight budget," Jim Morgan said. "We'll be looking at the same bills with a lot less income."

The random streak of bad luck that brought brucellosis to seven cows in their herd continues to puzzle the couple.

As Connie Malcolm stroked the blond head of her sleeping grandson, she smiled and said, "It's all about him now."

"Yes, but these are his cows, too," her daughter said.

http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2007/05/26/news/state/20-diagnosis.txt
 
Doesn't the Bangs vaccination work or did they not vaccinate their cows.?

The only ones I know that don't vaccinate are the 40 acre ranchers who keep one or two cows for property tax purposes.
 
Cowpuncher said:
Doesn't the Bangs vaccination work or did they not vaccinate their cows.?

The only ones I know that don't vaccinate are the 40 acre ranchers who keep one or two cows for property tax purposes.

Hi Cowpuncher!

There is not a vaccine that is 100% effective (100% protection). The "live" vaccines such as the the Brucellosis vaccine (the current strain used, I believe, is RB 51) and Anthrax are more effective than others, but still not 100%.

The North Dakota State Vet. said the vaccine is about 65% effective ( http://kxnet.com/News/Dakota/126122.asp ). In locations where there is a high risk of exposure to Brucella in the surrounding environment (i.e. those who border Jellystone Nat. Park) two doses of the vaccine are sometimes administered. I know this has occurred in eastern ID.

Too bad for the folks in MT who are battling this. I hope MT doesn't lose their status. In my opinion, however, they are lucky it isn't TB they are dealing with.

Cheers and prayers to the ranchers involved---

TTB :wink:
 
Emigrant ranch's cattle pass brucellosis test
By JAN FALSTAD
Of The Gazette Staff

Montana ranchers get to keep their brucellosis-free status for now, although the state remains in danger of losing the favored rating as the federal and state investigation continues.

Final tests Wednesday showed that 190 cattle on the Bruce Malcolm ranch near Emigrant were clean of brucellosis even though several of the seven Montana cows found carrying the disease came from this herd.

"It means that this place up here is free from brucellosis. No reactors. No positive ones. Every animal we have is negative," said Malcolm, who also serves as a Republican state representative from Emigrant.

Over the past few years, Malcolm has shipped some of his cattle to his daughter and son-in-law's ranch near Bridger, including a few of the cows that tested positive. The Bridger herd has been quarantined and investigators are focusing next on testing cattle in the Bridger area that may have been in contact with the Malcolm family cattle during the past two years. If even one cow from another herd tests positive in the ongoing investigation by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Montana will lose its brucellosis-free status.

Ranchers and others in the cattle industry will then have to pay for expensive testing and perhaps vaccinations against the disease that causes pregnant cows, elk, bison and hogs to abort.

Gov. Brian Schweitzer called a news conference in Helena Wednesday to say that this is "a big wake-up call."

"It leaves us with our brucellosis-free status intact," the governor said. "But it's a heck of a warning and we're not done yet. We've become CSI Montana."

Schweitzer again called for setting up a 50-mile "hot zone" around Yellowstone National Park where all cattle entering and leaving that area would be tested for brucellosis. This is the area where elk and bison, which can carry the disease, are most likely to come into contact with cattle. If any cattle test positive, only this area would lose its brucellosis-free status, not the whole state.

The governor said APHIS officials have told him they handle other diseases on a regional basis and are willing to discuss setting up a brucellosis "hot spot" in Montana.

The idea is supported by the Montana Cattlemen's Association, but not the Montana Stockgrowers Association.

Schweitzer said the bison management plan isn't working and he called on the stockgrowers to support his "hot zone" plan.

"We're not managing the disease, we're chasing buffalo in and out of the park," he said. "I sure wouldn't want to be that livestock organization that announces Montana has lost its brucellosis-free status."

Schweitzer also asked Christian Mackay, recently hired as the executive officer for the Department of Livestock, to start work immediately instead of June 1. And he called an emergency meeting of the livestock board for Tuesday.

Acting State Veterinarian Jeanne Rankin said that under federal rules, the state only has two months to trace and test all contact animals.

"We're at 55 days and counting and we will not rest until we've finished," she said.

There will be no appeal for the cattle on the Bridger ranch that have tested positive.

One cow was sold and shipped to Iowa before her positive test came back. She was euthanized at Iowa State University.

Six more positive cows, all with calves, remain on the quarantined ranch near Bridger.

Under APHIS rules, the entire herd of nearly 300 head must be destroyed by July 6.

"If Montana wishes to keep its class-free status, even without a new infected herd, that Bridger herd would have to be depopulated," APHIS spokeswoman Teresa Howes said from Fort Collins, Colo.

APHIS is negotiating a fair market price with the ranchers and when and agreement is reached, Howes said the Bridger cattle will be shipped.

"These animals in the Bridger herd will go into the food chain and they are perfectly safe to eat," Howes said.

Professor Emeritus Paul Nicoletti at the University of Florida in Gainesville is an expert on this disease, which he began studying in 1960. Nicknamed "Dr. Brucellosis" by his veterinary students, Nicoletti said the bacteria are concentrated in the animal's reproductive areas.

"Eating the beef isn't a problem, and the reason for that is the bacteria that causes the disease is confined to the organ parts of the body," Nicoletti said. "And those aren't used for consumption."

Montana State University Extension Beef Specialist John Paterson agreed with Nicoletti and recommended cooking beef to 160 degrees, which destroys brucellosis and other bacteria such as listeria or E. coli.

"It's OK to eat the meat because brucellosis does not get into the muscle," Paterson said. "If you are concerned about it, cook it to medium."

People can contract brucellosis, called undulant fever in humans, if they come into contact with infected tissues or fluids. That means veterinarians, slaughterhouse workers and ranchers are most at risk.

When he hunts, Paterson said he wears plastic gloves to field-dress an elk, but he doesn't worry about eating the meat.

I'll bet 'ol Schweitzer is dancing the jig now. He's been wanting to take away grazing leases from ranchers who lease closer to the park. As usual he'll get his way and it will probably happen :mad: :mad: :evil: :evil:
 
Oldtimer said:
Another article on the continuing brucellosis saga....I thought the part about our "not userfriendly USDA" was interesting...They got you coming or going... :roll: :(

Loss of herd to brucellosis test leaves couple reeling
'It's just a sinking feeling in the pit of your stomach,' Bridger rancher says
By JAN FALSTAD
Of The Gazette Staff

BRIDGER - Leaning slightly against a gusty, chilled north wind, Jim and Sandy Morgan surveyed their ranch south of Bridger.

The heavy-seeded grass was tall enough to wave in the wind. Reservoirs that were ringed with caked mud last summer were now brimming with spring rainwater. Plump Black Angus cows munched clover, calves in tow.

The Morgans' 7-month-old son, Jake, snoozed inside the house on his grandma's lap.

Jim grinned tightly and quipped, "I guess we won just the wrong lottery." The Morgans spent 10 days in early May gathering and matching cows to their rightful calves and riding a full day with six relatives to trail 300 cows to summer pasture.

They had just finished when Brent Thompson, the Billings-based veterinarian for the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), called on May 11. A cow from their herd had tested positive for brucellosis. Disbelief was Sandy Morgan's reaction.

"It's just a sinking feeling in the pit of your stomach, and we didn't understand all the ramifications," she said. "We didn't understand that the whole herd could be eliminated because of one cow."

They had to saddle up and spend four more days gathering their cattle from the rugged hills and moving them down to the home ranch for testing.

"It was hot, and those poor little calves - their tongues were hanging out," said Mary Heller, a ranch hand who dates Jim's brother, Steve Morgan.

Thompson and other veterinarians drew blood from the vein under the cows' tails, and six more cows tested positive.

The news hit May 18: Montana had brucellosis.

The bacterial disease imported from Europe a century ago can cause abortions in cows, elk, bison and hogs. Brucellosis is so feared that Thompson said there is only one hard rule to protect the nation's herds.

"A state is allowed one positive herd per year, and that herd must be depopulated," he said.

So the Morgans' cows are quarantined at the home ranch up Pryor Creek Mountain Road under mountains coated in a shawl of snow.

Their cows must be slaughtered by July 6 or the state will lose its brucellosis-free status. That will cost most of the state's ranchers months, even years, of paying for brucellosis testing and will cut into sales of Montana's world-class breeding stock.

Montana gets to keep its brucellosis-free status, for now. But if even one more animal from a separate herd tests positive, all bets are off. The tension will drag on for weeks as the extensive investigation tries to find all the cattle that may have been exposed.

It's reflected in the grim faces of the normally happy-go-lucky Morgans and of Bridger-area veterinarian Ray Randall.

"It seems like a radical thing to do to take that whole herd to slaughter, but there's no choice," said Randall, who said he supports the intensive investigation.

"It's really easy to bleed 1,000 cows and wonder why you did it rather than miss one cow," he said. "You don't want to go there."

Last week, North Dakota ordered most Montana cattle to be tested before entering that state. If Montana loses its "free brucellosis pass," local vets will be drawing blood from all export cattle of breeding age until the state goes 12 months without a positive test.

On Friday, the testing continued on cattle that may have been exposed to Jim Morgan's herd.

Steve Morgan leases land from his brother, and blood was drawn from his 45 cows. That was also the case with another 45 at a neighbor's spread. Results won't come back from the Montana State Laboratory in Bozeman until at least the middle of next week because of the holiday weekend.

Cattle on seven other neighboring ranches also will be tested when Thompson and the other veterinarians resume work after Memorial Day.

"We're going to try to get on to everybody as soon as we can," Thompson said.

The herd owned by Sandy's father, Republican state Rep. Bruce Malcolm from Emigrant, tested clean this week. Malcolm sells bred heifers, and over the past few years, he and his wife, Connie, have trucked cows to their daughter's ranch near Bridger.

Malcolm's herd at Emigrant initially was considered the source ranch, especially because of its proximity to Yellowstone National Park, where wandering elk and bison are prone to carry brucellosis.

While visiting his family near Bridger on Friday, Malcolm told the federal veterinarians that because his herd is fine, there should be no reason for more tests in Paradise Valley.

"My place is clear, and that's far enough," Malcolm said. "You don't need to bother my neighbors."

Don Otto, a federal veterinarian from Iowa who happened to be traveling through Montana and who had time to help out, disagreed. He has been down this road in his home state, he said, and it's crucial that all potentially exposed cattle be tested.

"There's a lot of pain, a lot of pain," Otto said. "But the loss of that status is going to cost Montana ranchers a lot of money."

Brucellosis is spread by animals who lick or ingest aborted fetuses or come into contact with infected reproductive tissues or fluids. It's a disease that affects breeding animals 18 months or older.

Neither APHIS nor the Morgans know the source yet.

However, in recent years, a herd of about 200 elk was hanging around Belfry and Bridger until two special hunts cut its numbers.

"Before those damage hunts, you could walk out to the road and see them come off the hills and go back after eating a belly full of corn," Jim Morgan said.

He wonders if those elk may have wandered out of the park, down the Meeteetse Trail, down Line Creek and carried brucellosis to the Bridger country. Or maybe it came from other cattle.

Jim and Sandy wonder how to negotiate a fair price with APHIS for spring-weight calves that normally would be sold in the fall, when they would bring twice the money. They wonder how to buy replacement cattle in a tight market when prices are at near-record highs.

And Sandy is having trouble grasping the loss of genetics that her namesake and grandfather, Alex Sandy Malcolm, started 65 years ago.

"You spend years weeding out the cows who don't do well in this country and breeding the best and working hard and then the phone rings and it all changes," she said. "It's just like going to a funeral before it happens."

The Morgans have 110 cows running on other land that will be tested. If those come back negative, the cows will form the nucleus of another herd. They are also buying 40 more heifers from Malcolm. Still, they estimate it may take at least four years to rebuild.

"If you keep the heifers, it's two years before they can raise a calf, so it's a time-consuming project," Jim Morgan said.

And there's one more box canyon in the Morgans' lives.

For the past year, they've negotiated a loan to refinance their ranch through a local bank. The note would be guaranteed by Farm Credit Services, part of the USDA.

The good news came two weeks ago.

"We'd been approved and, finally, we could breathe a sigh of relief," Sandy said.

Then the USDA officer heard about the brucellosis tests and called the Morgan's banker to say, "I might have to pull my horns in on their loan."

So the agency that is forcing the slaughter of their 300 cows, even for a just cause, may be denying them the loan they need.

"Every rancher runs on a tight budget," Jim Morgan said. "We'll be looking at the same bills with a lot less income."

The random streak of bad luck that brought brucellosis to seven cows in their herd continues to puzzle the couple.

As Connie Malcolm stroked the blond head of her sleeping grandson, she smiled and said, "It's all about him now."

"Yes, but these are his cows, too," her daughter said.

http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2007/05/26/news/state/20-diagnosis.txt

Here is the very first blog beneath the article and it sounds exactly like Schweitzer:

Immunize cattle around Yellowstone? wrote on May 26, 2007 2:50 AM
I'm not a rancher. Cattle ranching is this State's economic backbone. I hope these herds test clear. If they do, perhaps the State should create a protective zone around the Park where all the cattle would be immunized for Brucellosis, at the States's expense, to insure that Montana keeps it's Brucellosis free status. We all like the Park, we all like the elk and bison, and we all want to see the State prosper. Subsidizing these ranchers to protect the State seems like a good investment to me. ... This article implies that APHIS will be reimbursing for the cattle that have to be destroyed, but it sure is short on details of that program.

I'm very glad this is going to happen so Schweitzer and his cronies can't get away with multiple blogging under different names:

Editor's note: On Tuesday, May 29, Billingsgazette.com will be unveiling a new version the popular Talk Back feature. The feature has been active for just over one year and we have received lots of useful feedback from the community asking for changes. We have heard those requests and now we're responding.

The biggest change with the new system will be the addition of a user registration system. Users will only need a valid email address to register - no personal information will be required. Registration will also enable users to create their own unique login name and reader profile, where each reader can view their personal Talk Back statistics and history.

The new system will also have comment ratings, where each user can "rate" a comment with the click of a button. If a comment receives a low enough rating, it is temporarily hidden, unless the reader chooses to display it again.

We believe these improvements will make the Talk Back portion of our site even more useful and entertaining for readers by giving more control to the readers, increasing the accountability for commenters, and raising the overall level of discourse.

The Talk Back feature may be disabled for as long as 24 hours on Tuesday to implement the system change. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected].

Billingsgazette.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. By submitting a comment, you are agreeing to the terms & conditions set out in our comment policy.
 
Turkey Track Bar said:
Cowpuncher said:
Doesn't the Bangs vaccination work or did they not vaccinate their cows.?

The only ones I know that don't vaccinate are the 40 acre ranchers who keep one or two cows for property tax purposes.

Hi Cowpuncher!

There is not a vaccine that is 100% effective (100% protection). The "live" vaccines such as the the Brucellosis vaccine (the current strain used, I believe, is RB 51) and Anthrax are more effective than others, but still not 100%.

The North Dakota State Vet. said the vaccine is about 65% effective ( http://kxnet.com/News/Dakota/126122.asp ). In locations where there is a high risk of exposure to Brucella in the surrounding environment (i.e. those who border Jellystone Nat. Park) two doses of the vaccine are sometimes administered. I know this has occurred in eastern ID.

Ditto... if you think about it, brucellosis is the only vaccine we give that's only given ONCE in the animal's lifetime, and it's often given at a high-stress time, ie weaning, branding, dehorning, other vaccinations, etc., when the animal's immune system is already stressed and unlikely to respond as well as it should. No wonder it sometimes doesn't offer adequate protection.
 
Actually Hanta- the plan is that no "ruminant" animals be grazed within a certain distance of the park and a 50 mile hot zone be set up that requires more testing-- and the plan is starting to get a lot of backing in the areas of the state away from the Park, since the Administration and USDA refuse to do anything with their Park wildlife herds...

Maybe you can get some of the park boundary leases-and since the proposed horse slaughter ban says the USDA must care for all abandoned horses- you can contract and get paid big money to run some of the governments new horse herd they are inheriting...

Just think- you could probably be working with Bo Derek :wink: :lol:
 
Those poor people been down that road in the seventies. Government man branded every cow with a B on the jaw and to the salebarn they went, we got pennies on the dollar.
 
Caustic Burno said:
Those poor people been down that road in the seventies. Government man branded every cow with a B on the jaw and to the salebarn they went, we got pennies on the dollar.

I went down that road myself, CB.

Had to go through 3 clean tests before they quit harrassing us. Was not fun.
 
I too feel sorry for these people...you see Canada has been through this with BSE,I truly feel for anybody that faces loses of thier herds and thier livleyhood....See the parallel?????
 

Latest posts

Top