Wouldn't that be good, no-ear, black-hide calves...regardless of breed?Soapweed said:Sometimes we need to take into consideration that it is not always what we want, but what the buyers are seeking and are willing to pay a premium to acquire.
RobertMac said:Wouldn't that be good, no-ear, black-hide calves...regardless of breed?Soapweed said:Sometimes we need to take into consideration that it is not always what we want, but what the buyers are seeking and are willing to pay a premium to acquire.
Why else would almost every breed try to turn their cattle black?
Maybe a better question considering all the cross-breeding and out-crossing...what exactly is a "breed"?
Grassfarmer said:OK andybob I'll throw this one in as out of the box thinking![]()
I quote a breeder;
"We are producing Whitebred Shorthorn cross Highland cows at 440kgs with a three-month-old calf weighing 140kgs. By the time it is weaned the calf is over three-quarters of the mother's own bodyweight which in anyone's book is highly efficient production."
Hard to argue with that for performance. Check out http://www.whitebredshorthorn.co.uk
The difficulty in my opinion would be sourcing enough good quality WB Shorthorn and Highland cattle but like any breed I guess there are good ones out there.
Soapweed said:Sometimes we need to take into consideration that it is not always what we want, but what the buyers are seeking and are willing to pay a premium to acquire.
Grassfarmer said:Soapweed said:Sometimes we need to take into consideration that it is not always what we want, but what the buyers are seeking and are willing to pay a premium to acquire.
True but we also need to do our sums correctly and calculate what the premium really is. I read a few years back a comment by a bull producer (of multiple breeds) in his sale catalog that "for the first time in his life black angus calves were selling for more $cwt than tan charolais calves" This observation was obviously an earth shattering revelation to him because he was selling more Charolais than Angus at that time. I got to thinking afterwards that the statement he made really wasn't all that remarkable.
If you sell 500lb Angus calves at $105/cwt versus Charolais at $100/cwt sure that's $25 advantage to the Angus. However if your Charolais bull is worth his salt his calves will weigh 80lbs more than the straight Angus at the same age, advantage $55 to the Charolais. So much for the Angus outselling the Charolais. I have never seen good black steers outsell good tan char. steers in western Canada by more than 5c/lb.
I don't have a dog in this race as I don't breed either but I think no matter your breed or breed preference you need to be careful not to buy into the BS and fashion influenced trends of the day.
Northern Rancher said:I don't think calving ease comes automatically with straight breeding not even in Nebraska-if you use the right cattle within a breed it can but it can go the other way just as quick.
MoGal said:What about tarentaise?
They had them on "the cattle show" as a featured breed and I thought they were nice.... they were solid red (and maybe that's the only color they come in, I don't know).
Anyone have any experience with those or crosses thereof?
Also, do the red polls do okay in Canada?
Northern Rancher said:Tarentaise are hard to beat for udder quality-there almost seems to be two lines of them -one kind of frailer dairy types and others pretty darn thick. There's some good ones down around Swift Current Sask. They can be ringy little buggers to heel at a branding lol.
Big Swede said:If you believe all the research an F1 female is worth $50 more income per year. For all of us straight breeding take $50 times the number of cows we run and tell me why we aren't crossbreeding. Tradition, stubbornness, or maybe none of us needs the extra income? :? I've been thinking about it for years but thinking doesn't make my cows crossbreds for some reason.
Northern Rancher said:The best cross in the cattle business is a Hereford cow and an oil well lol.