• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

DURBIN FOOD SAFETY AMENDMENT APPROVED BY SENATE 94-0

PORKER

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
4,170
Location
Michigan-Florida
DURBIN FOOD SAFETY AMENDMENT APPROVED BY SENATE

Wednesday, May 2, 2007


[WASHINGTON, DC] - Today the Senate passed, by a vote of 94-0, an amendment introduced by U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) that will strengthen the nation's food safety system. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), one of the federal agencies charged with safeguarding the U.S. food supply, has come under fire recently in the wake of nationwide recalls and quarantines of tainted pork, spinach, peanut butter and pet food.

Durbin's amendment establishes an early warning and notification system for human food, as well as pet food, establish fines for companies that don't promptly report contaminated products, improves inspections/monitoring of imports, and provides better, more uniform pet food safety standards. Durbin's amendment was accepted today as part of the FDA Reauthorization bill, S.1082, now on the Senate floor.

"With the passage of this amendment, we will make our nation's food safety system stronger on several fronts. We have strengthened regulation of imported food; instituted a better record keeping, tracking and inspection process for human and pet food; put in place an early warning system when outbreaks of contaminated food occur; set uniform standards for pet food; and instituted fines for companies that fail to report problems," said Durbin. "There is more work to be done to fix our food safety system, but today we have moved forward to address the growing concerns across our nation."

Durbin said that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate that as many as 76 million people suffer from food poisoning each year. Of those individuals, approximately 325,000 will be hospitalized, and more than 5,000 will die. With emerging pathogens, a population at high risk for food-borne illnesses and an increasing volume of food imports, these numbers cannot improve without decisive action.

Some of the new responsibilities given to the FDA under Durbin's amendment include:


Establishing an early warning and notification system for human food as well as pet food products. The legislation directs the FDA to work with professional organizations, veterinarians, and others to disseminate information about pet food contamination and in cases of both pet and human food, to keep up to date, comprehensive, searchable recall lists on their website.
Improving FDA's ability to detect problems, and alert consumers of contaminants by creating an adulterated food registry for imported and domestically produced food. The amendment requires the FDA to establish a registry to collect information on cases of potentially dangerous food adulteration to improve risk-based surveillance of food safety and improve the speed at which consumers and firms are notified. Importers and domestic processors and manufactures of food would have to submit information pertaining to actual or suspected adulteration of food. The submission would be made to the FDA for inclusion in a centralized database through an electronic portal. The sources of the recent human and pet food contamination were wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate that originated in China. Neither shipment was inspected by FDA; in fact, FDA inspects fewer than 1.5% of imports. A database would give FDA better information on which to base inspections.

Requiring companies to maintain records and make them accessible to FDA as part of an investigation. This provision would prevent delays that could keep contaminations from being traced as quickly as possible. In the case of the recalled peanut butter this past winter, an FDA report showed that inspectors were denied documents when they requested them. The bill would clarify that when FDA conducts inspections, it will have timely access to those documents needed to safeguard the food supply.

Establishing uniform federal standards and better labeling of pet food. The guidances and practices that today govern the pet food industry are implemented on a voluntary basis by manufacturers and state departments of agriculture. However, there is no requirement for states to adopt these practices and they don't have the force of federal guidelines. Inspections are not coordinated state to state and some states have different standards than others.
Senator Durbin and Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) have been actively engaged on food safety issues for over a decade. This Congress they introduced legislation that calls for the development of a single food safety agency and the implementation of a food safety program to standardize American food safety activities (The Safe Food Act - S. 654 and H.R. 1148 in the Senate and House respectively). Currently, there are at least 12 different federal agencies and 35 different laws governing food safety. With overlapping jurisdictions, federal agencies often lack accountability on food safety-related issues.
 
Requiring companies to maintain records and make them accessible to FDA as part of an investigation. This provision would prevent delays that could keep contaminations from being traced as quickly as possible.

Thats right , just enforce the 2002 FDA Bioterrorism traceback recordkeeping RULES, just like the hay growers and truckers have to do everyday. Rules link; http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/recguid3.html

Such as rule;28.1 Q: [Added November 2005] An animal food manufacturer receives commingled product from three different facilities and produces an animal feed finished product. The product is sold directly to farmers as feed, and also to subsequent animal food manufacturers who commingle it with other food ingredients and make a final saleable product. What information must the records established and maintained by the original manufacturer contain?

A: The firm manufactures a product that is both a finished feed and a feed ingredient. As discussed in the response to comment 61 in the Final Rule preamble, "food" includes food ingredients. For the purpose of this rule, the only difference in the record requirements therefore concerns the container of the product. If the manufacturer is placing the product in contact with a finished container in which it will be received by an individual consumer (not a business), the manufacturer must establish and maintain records of the receipt of the finished container in accordance with 21 CFR 1.327(k) and must identify the specific source of the finished container in the record of release of the finished food as specified by §1.345(b). With respect to all other ingredients incorporated in the product, the manufacturer must always establish and maintain records of receipt that include the information specified in §1.337, including the lot or code number or other identifier if it exists. When the manufacturer releases the finished product, it must establish and maintain records of release to any person who is not an individual consumer, including farms. Although farms themselves are exempt from all requirements as provided by §1.327(a), records must be established and maintained by the nontransporter (including the original manufacturer) and transporter immediate previous source of food released to farms.
 
Dick Durbin is a complete IDIOT! AND his buddy Barack Obamabitch is worse yet! :roll: They are both a disgrace to Illinois and the USA!
 
CattleCo said:
Dick Durbin is a complete IDIOT! AND his buddy Barack Obamabitch is worse yet! :roll: They are both a disgrace to Illinois and the USA!

CattleCo, you must have a few reasons for saying this. Perhaps you could share this personal or regional experience.
 
There is always a good side and a bad side to everybody. Just as there is for every law. Sometimes something that sounds good really is a back-stabbing, low-life, do-for-yourself idea.
 
The price is too high for imported food
By Phyllis Schlafly
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Email It
Print It
Take Action
Read Article & Comments (26) Trackbacks Post Your Comments

The vast production of food in the United States is one of the greatest achievements of American free enterprise society of a superior system of patents that encourages the invention of fantastically efficient farm machinery. In one of America's favorite patriotic songs, we wax lyrical about our "amber waves of grain."

The Clinton administration conned American farmers into being the principal lobbyists in 2000 for passage of Permanent Normal Trade Relations for China, which gave Chinese goods unconditional access to U.S. markets.

Former President Bill Clinton promised in his State of the Union address that Permanent Normal Trade Relations for China would be a win-win for American agriculture because "this agreement will open China's market to us." The Department of Agriculture under Clinton predicted that the average annual value of U.S. agricultural exports to China would increase by $1.5 billion.

Globalization turned out to be a cheat. Department of Commerce figures show that U.S. wheat exports to China are less today than before the passage of Permanent Normal Trade Relations.

Cheap labor in Asia can produce some agricultural products less expensively than they can be with all our expensive equipment, and China's food exports to the United States have become a $2.1 billion industry. The United States is now importing 13 percent of the food Americans eat.

But Americans can't count the cost merely in dollars and in bushels. China simply doesn't have health, sanitary or safety standards that Americans expect for the U.S. food supply.

So the United States recently discovered that China has been intentionally mixing an industrial chemical called melamine into pet food and animal feed imported by U.S. companies and sold here under more than 100 brand names. Melamine, which is both a contaminant and byproduct of several pesticides, is used to make plastic kitchenware, glues, countertops, fabrics, fertilizers and flame retardants.

Because melamine is high in nitrogen, the Chinese have been putting it into wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate in order to trick Americans into thinking they are buying feed with higher protein content. Melamine has no nutritional value.

As this scandal unfolds, we also learn that the Chinese have been putting cyanuric acid, a chemical related to melamine that is used in chlorination during pool cleaning, into wheat gluten products sold to the United States.

The Food and Drug Administration discovered this deception when pets started dying. Melamine contamination is implicated in some 4,000 cat and dog deaths, 60 million packages of pet food have been recalled, and regulators have blocked all Chinese imports of wheat gluten and warned importers to screen every kind of food and feed additive coming from China.

Americans also learned that 6,000 hogs in eight states might have been fed salvage products containing tainted rice gluten, and several hundred of these hogs may have entered the human food supply. The U.S. Department of Agriculture has put a hold on 20 million chickens raised for human consumption that ate melamine-tainted feed.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top