You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
First case of Variant CJD in the Netherlands
- Thread starter Murgen
- Start date
Help Support Ranchers.net:
Kathy
Well-known member
What about the dozens of other countries that received boat loads of UK meat and bone meal, such as Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Eastern Europe, Middle East, India... Boat loads of meat and bone meal from the UK were shipped to these various areas/countries and they have not developed BSE. If you believe the infectious MBM theory, than there should have been thousands of BSE cases in these other countries.
How do you explain these countries not developing BSE?
How do you explain these countries not developing BSE?
Kathy said:What about the dozens of other countries that received boat loads of UK meat and bone meal, such as Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Eastern Europe, Middle East, India... Boat loads of meat and bone meal from the UK were shipped to these various areas/countries and they have not developed BSE. If you believe the infectious MBM theory, than there should have been thousands of BSE cases in these other countries.
How do you explain these countries not developing BSE?
Kathy, do you know if the other countries you listed test many cattle?
Kathy
Well-known member
Sorry rancher, I can't answer this question. However, I would think any country which imported boat loads of infectious meat and bone meal from the UK would be on the look out for BSE. They would want to be able to sue the UK government, just as France reportedly is, for causing their BSE problem and harming their industry.
I understand what you are thinking, if they don't test they won't find it; however, the UK diagnosed BSE on Guernsey Island by clinical symptoms only:
OIE chart, UK BSE cases:
This shows that a country need not rely on lab tests for diagnosis. Of course (in my opinion), you'd have to be a blooming idiot not to test animals suspected of having the disease. But the UK has shown us that they relied upon visual inspection only on Guernsey Island, so why couldn't these other countries do the same.
Being the world is a small place, now of days, I don't think you could hide the disease for very long. Though some might be better at that then others.
I understand what you are thinking, if they don't test they won't find it; however, the UK diagnosed BSE on Guernsey Island by clinical symptoms only:
OIE chart, UK BSE cases:
In Guernsey BSE is generally confirmed on the basis of clinical signs only. To date, a total of 600 animals have been confirmed without laboratory examination.
This shows that a country need not rely on lab tests for diagnosis. Of course (in my opinion), you'd have to be a blooming idiot not to test animals suspected of having the disease. But the UK has shown us that they relied upon visual inspection only on Guernsey Island, so why couldn't these other countries do the same.
Being the world is a small place, now of days, I don't think you could hide the disease for very long. Though some might be better at that then others.