Gipsa Vs. Farmland Beef

[Econ101]

Conman: "Anyone who disagrees with you is defined as a "liar" in your dictionary, SH."

Yet another lie. That's your second lie for the day. Right on track!

Can't wait for your next lie.

Sandbag: "LEGITIMATE market manipulation? In your world, what seperates legitmate from illigitmate manipulation. How can one manipulate markets legitmately?"

The seperation is between "LEGITIMATE" market manipulation and "PERCEIVED" market manipulation you idiot.

Another spin into the twighlight zone by the master illusionist.


NEXT!


~SH~

And I suppose the Supreme Court should look to you for guidance on this issue? Maybe you should spell out all "legitimate" market manipulations so we are not all confused.

If this was Tyson's legal defense, why did they not just state it up front? There would be no need for a trial, just a judgment as a matter of law---Oh, I forgot, Tyson strings along producers in huge time and money consuming cases all the while the USDA dumbs down GIPSA and allows corruption to run rampant over there. What is that called? A bird in the hand--and one controlling the Bushes?

Another spin into the twighlight zone by the master illusionist.

 

[Sandhusker]

SH, "The seperation is between "LEGITIMATE" market manipulation and "PERCEIVED" market manipulation you idiot. Another spin into the twighlight zone by the master illusionist."

How does one ligitimately manipulate a market?

 

[Anonymous]

Conman: "And I suppose the Supreme Court should look to you for guidance on this issue?"

Why would they? They are not stupid enough to prosecute ibp based on "UNSUPPORTED THEORIES" and "BASELESS ALLEGATIONS".

Any predictions on whether the Supreme Court will even hear the Pickett case?

Conman: "Maybe you should spell out all "legitimate" market manipulations so we are not all confused."

A babbling idiot like you will always be confused. That's a given. Legitimate market manipulation is market manipulation that has been proven to be market manipulation in a court of law. Not speculation and theories based on some packer blamer's need to blame.

Conman: "If this was Tyson's legal defense, why did they not just state it up front? There would be no need for a trial, just a judgment as a matter of law---Oh, I forgot, Tyson strings along producers in huge time and money consuming cases all the while the USDA dumbs down GIPSA and allows corruption to run rampant over there. What is that called? A bird in the hand--and one controlling the Bushes?"

Blah, blah, blah! All allegations and no facts to back them. Poor, poor little packer blamers.

Sandhusker: "How does one ligitimately manipulate a market?"

Typical Sandbag spin job!

No response to such stupidity necessary.



~SH~

 

[Sandhusker]

Quote:
Sandhusker: "How does one ligitimately manipulate a market?"


SH avoiding a question for the fifth time this morning,"Typical Sandbag spin job! No response to such stupidity necessary. "

I responded to your stupidity. Why can't you answer a simple question? You're the one who brought up ligitimate market manipulation and said you supported it. How can you support it if you can't define it?

 

[Anonymous]

I'm not playing your stupid immature little word games Sandbag.

The court system will seperate "LEGITIMATE" market manipulation from "PERCEIVED" market manipulation.

"Legitimate, as stated here, means "REAL" market manipulation as opposed to "IMAGINED" market manipulation.

I'm not going to explain it again.

Now, do you want to keep playing games based on your little spin job of "legitimate market manipulation" as opposed to "REAL" market manipulation vs "IMAGINED" market manipulation.

You can go on and on about absolutely nothing for days can't you? You'll still be bitching about Creekstone 10 years from now defining your desperation to find something to bench about.

Do you take a lot of pride in acting like such an idiot? Do you really think you're cute? Deceptive people like you make me sick. That's the whole root of the problem with R-CULT too. If they can't back their position, they create the illusion that they can.

My break from you two idiots was nice but readers deserve to see you liars and deceivers exposed.


~SH~

 

[Econ101]

I'm not playing your stupid immature little word games Sandbag.

The court system will seperate "LEGITIMATE" market manipulation from "PERCEIVED" market manipulation.

"Legitimate, as stated here, means "REAL" market manipulation as opposed to "IMAGINED" market manipulation.

I'm not going to explain it again.

Now, do you want to keep playing games based on your little spin job of "legitimate market manipulation" as opposed to "REAL" market manipulation vs "IMAGINED" market manipulation.

You can go on and on about absolutely nothing for days can't you? You'll still be bitching about Creekstone 10 years from now defining your desperation to find something to bench about.

Do you take a lot of pride in acting like such an idiot? Do you really think you're cute? Deceptive people like you make me sick. That's the whole root of the problem with R-CULT too. If they can't back their position, they create the illusion that they can.

My break from you two idiots was nice but readers deserve to see you liars and deceivers exposed.


~SH~

Okay, SH, where is the lie or deception? Was it that the USDA didn't want to decieve Japanese customers that 24 month old cattle sold to Japan are not BSE free?

 

[Sandhusker]

I"M playing word games? Are you in a tight spot, SH? Have you "trapped yourself" again? If you support legitimate market manipluation, I'm sure I'm not the only one who is curious on how you seperate the "good" manipulation from the "bad". What do you use to help you decide on what manipulation you support as "legitimate" from what you reject?

 

[Anonymous]

Conman: "Okay, SH, where is the lie or deception?"

I'll proceed to answer the question for the sake of other readers knowing full well you are too stupid to comprehend the answer.

Creekstone wanted to use BSE tests that would not reveal BSE prions in cattle under 24 months of age. Creekstone's own Fielding admitted that "BSE TESTED" does not mean "BSE FREE" but he knew that "BSE TESTED" implies "BSE FREE". That's the deception! Japanese consumers, IF ALLOWED, would have bought "BSE TESTED" beef thinking that it was "BSE FREE" when the bse tests Creekstone planned to use would not have revealed BSE prions anyway.

Did you understand that? Of course you didn't because you're an idiot!


~SH~

 

[Sandhusker]

SH, "... but he knew that "BSE TESTED" implies "BSE FREE".

WHOA UP THERE! That OPINION is PURE SPECULATION on your part. Do you have any direct comment from Fielding about what BSE tested implies?

 

[Econ101]

Conman: "Okay, SH, where is the lie or deception?"

I'll proceed to answer the question for the sake of other readers knowing full well you are too stupid to comprehend the answer.

Creekstone wanted to use BSE tests that would not reveal BSE prions in cattle under 24 months of age. Creekstone's own Fielding admitted that "BSE TESTED" does not mean "BSE FREE" but he knew that "BSE TESTED" implies "BSE FREE". That's the deception! Japanese consumers, IF ALLOWED, would have bought "BSE TESTED" beef thinking that it was "BSE FREE" when the bse tests Creekstone planned to use would not have revealed BSE prions anyway.

Did you understand that? Of course you didn't because you're an idiot!


~SH~

Okay, SH, where is the lie or deception? Was it that the USDA didn't want to decieve Japanese customers that 24 month old cattle sold to Japan are not BSE free?

 

[Anonymous]

Sandbag: "WHOA UP THERE! That OPINION is PURE SPECULATION on your part."

Speculation my ars!

Fielding said, "BSE TESTED" does not mean "BSE FREE".

How much plainer can it be?

Now do you want to try to spin that interpretation????

Sandbag: "Do you have any direct comment from Fielding about what BSE tested implies?"

None is needed beyond his own admission that BSE tested does not mean BSE free.

How many times do we have to go over the same bullsh*t???

Your stupid arguments never change. You never had anything before and you don't have anything now.

Conman: " Okay, SH, where is the lie or deception?"

I JUST ANSWERED THAT!

Can't you read?


What a pair!

I missed you guys like a cold sore.


~SH~