• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Government won't pursue official who stalled livestock prici

HAY MAKER

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
8,789
Location
Texas
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Agriculture Department has decided not to take action against a former agency official who blocked investigations into predatory pricing in the nation's $120 billion livestock trade.

Gross mismanagement, not criminal conduct, by JoAnn Waterfield is to blame for several years of obstruction, department Inspector General Phyllis Fong told the Senate Agriculture Committee on Thursday.

"I'm not sure what further action could be taken," said Fong, who released an audit on the problems in January. "What we found I guess we would best characterize as tremendous mismanagement."

There was "no indication of criminal conduct," Fong added.

The department is making big changes in response to the report, said James E. Link, the new administrator of the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration.

"We have already begun making the fundamental changes in the culture of the organization," Link told senators, describing a series of steps he has taken.

Employees were frustrated with management and felt they couldn't do their jobs, Link has said. He's created a private Web site for employees to confide in him.

Senators were wary of his pledges. Different government investigators have been calling for changes at GIPSA since 1997.

"I hope you'll understand if I'm a little skeptical," Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa, the panel's senior Democrat, told Link. "We've heard promises before. USDA has a long history ... of never following through."

The latest audit said Waterfield stopped complaints from being filed or prosecuted. She pressured employees to create an appearance of strong enforcement by logging day-to-day activity - sending letters or making phone calls - as investigations, according to the audit.

Waterfield, who quit abruptly before the audit was released, did not return a call from The Associated Press. She spent about 14 years at the Agriculture Department, the last five as deputy administrator for the Packers and Stockyards Program, part of GIPSA.

That program oversees a $120 billion industry and is supposed to investigate practices that inhibit competition, unfairness and deception in the livestock, meatpacking and poultry trade.

Lawmakers asked if Waterfield's superiors knew about the obstruction. The inspector general said they did not. "We have no evidence there was tremendous involvement of the ranks above her in any kind of sense," Fong said.

Harkin, who requested the audit, asked why department lawyers failed to notice or alert higher-ups that competition investigations were not being referred to them.

Mary Hobbie, the department's assistant general counsel on trade practices, pointed out that other types of cases, financial and trade investigations, have been pursued.

But it is competition, not finances or trade practices, that concerns Congress most. Many lawmakers are alarmed about the level of consolidation among meatpackers.

"If our local ranchers can only market to huge meatpackers who appear to be coordinating prices with each other, there's definitely something wrong," said Sen. Craig Thomas, R-Wyo.

Four companies control more than 80 percent of the market, said Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo.

---
 
Not taking action is just another coverup. Fong did not look into the problem for criminal intent. That was not her job. She was investigating based on Harkin's letter. Harkin is the ranking democrat on the Senate Agriculture Nutrition, and Forestry Committee. There have been no oversight committee hearings during the Republican control of Congress. It was funny to me how the Leher (sp?) report on NPR television shelfed one of the comentator's comments on the fact that there have been no oversight hearings. Of course NPR has recieved a LOT of money from Archer Daniels. I don't know a lot about the Grain Inspection part of GIPSA but if it is run as poorly as the Packers and Stockyards side, there is a lot of concern.

When there have been inklings of oversight, as with Arlen Specter's look into the NAS spying, it has been shelved as quietyly as it could be. Then Specter comes out with a warning to make it look like he is serious about the issue (funding threat this time). These guys are covering their butts so no one can see how they are mooning the American farmer/rancher an public. All for the upper hand in campaign contributions.

If they were doing their job correctely, they would get some leverage on JoAnn Waterfield and make her squawk. It seems they just let the old bird go. What a joke. This system is set up and being run for failure.
 
Sandhusker said:
WHY did she do it? That is the question that has to be answered.

Always follow the money. I don't think IG or GAO had the authority to delve into personal financial matters. That would be only for DOJ. I bet Harkin has suggested it though.
 
Mike said:
Sandhusker said:
WHY did she do it? That is the question that has to be answered.

Always follow the money. I don't think IG or GAO had the authority to delve into personal financial matters. That would be only for DOJ. I bet Harkin has suggested it though.

You can count on it. He knows the politics of the DOJ, though. Specter's committee is has oversight into the DOJ as well as the judicial nominations. I don't think Porter Goss, director of CIA, will do anything without any of these issues unless it comes from the president of the U.S. His republican buddies involved sure do not want any movement on any of these issues. As you know, the CIA has responsibilities overseas but the recent domestic spy cases overlap. Here is just a snippet from a NV Congressman on Porter:

"Over the years that I have worked with Porter Goss on the Intelligence Committee he has become not only a mentor to me, but also a close, personal friend. I hold Porter, his insight and experience, in the highest regard. I can say with the utmost confidence that he will serve the CIA and this nation with great distinction.



"Since September 11th, 2001, our intelligence community has come under great scrutiny and implemented some historic changes. However, much reform still lies ahead to ensure that the CIA, FBI, and all other intelligence agencies share information and communicate effectively to guard against future terrorist plots."---Jim Gibbons

DOJ will not do anything on any of these matters. I would assume that is why Harkin brilliantly threw it up to where the buck stops--the President. This deserves his attention.
 
reader (the Second) said:
Econ101 said:
Mike said:
Always follow the money. I don't think IG or GAO had the authority to delve into personal financial matters. That would be only for DOJ. I bet Harkin has suggested it though.

You can count on it. He knows the politics of the DOJ, though. Specter's committee is has oversight into the DOJ as well as the judicial nominations. I don't think Porter Goss, director of CIA, will do anything without any of these issues unless it comes from the president of the U.S. His republican buddies involved sure do not want any movement on any of these issues. As you know, the CIA has responsibilities overseas but the recent domestic spy cases overlap. Here is just a snippet from a NV Congressman on Porter:

"Over the years that I have worked with Porter Goss on the Intelligence Committee he has become not only a mentor to me, but also a close, personal friend. I hold Porter, his insight and experience, in the highest regard. I can say with the utmost confidence that he will serve the CIA and this nation with great distinction.



"Since September 11th, 2001, our intelligence community has come under great scrutiny and implemented some historic changes. However, much reform still lies ahead to ensure that the CIA, FBI, and all other intelligence agencies share information and communicate effectively to guard against future terrorist plots."---Jim Gibbons

DOJ will not do anything on any of these matters. I would assume that is why Harkin brilliantly threw it up to where the buck stops--the President. This deserves his attention.

Did I miss something? Why would the CIA be involved in inappropriate or illegal actions of a U.S. Government official???

Sorry reader, there are some things I haven't responded to fully. Our government works on balances. Balances of interersts. One of the problems right now with the current makeup in the Senate and the House is that we have no balance between the parties. This has allowed NO OVERSIGHT for the last 5 years. Combine that with the coordination of the national intelligence gathering capabilities and you have some real potential problems. Although this administration wants to portray the NAS spying deal on working against terrorism, the reality is that without court oversight, there can be abuses. Without the recording of who is being spied on, there is a real potential for industrial espionage for large campaign contributors. Since there is no record with respect to who is being spied upon, we will never know if this is or is not the case. The innocense until proven guilty phrase comes to mind here.

We are all familiar with the abuses in the Nixon administration when it came to the capabilities and also to Clinton's travelgate. We can ONLY trust that our govt. will do the right thing when it comes to these instances when we have no checks and balances. What has been the track record of this adminstation so far?

The loss of the checks and balances in our system has become a great concern for me. The combination and coordination of powers has also. Chertoff has proven that they are not working on the real issues of homeland security and coordination of agencies for national disaster or terrorism. What are they working on then? Will we ever know? Are we dismantling the systems of checks and balances with the NAS spying just in the name of anti-terrorism. If my history recollection is correct, this reasoning has been used in politics since the beginning of time. It is a real scary road we are on.

I do not happen to be a catholic partly because I don't think ANY one man has been given complete authority on earth. None of us are worthy for that responsibility and very very few can even handle a small portion of it. Our checks and balances are being dismantled. We need to make sure that does not happen.

To answer your question, the CIA does not nor ever should have inside the U.S. capabilities. The NAS deal and cooperation with homeland security as well as whistleblower protections not being enforced and reporters thrown in jail for "leaks" from the whitehouse are just scary developments. The abuse of power by JoAnn Waterfield in blocking the actions in her agency for such a long time with no oversight is disturbing. The early reporting that the USDA intends to give her a free walk is just as disturbing. One coverup after another. Who of us can believe we are part of the good old boys club as the country is now being run? Can the cattleman? Do the current actions of the USDA attest to that?

To quote Shakespear, Something stinks in the state of denmark, and no one is looking to find the source of that stink. It is all being swept under the rug.

None of these things should be happening. Why do you think Congress has such low ratings these days?
 
The abuse of power by JoAnn Waterfield in blocking the actions in her agency for such a long time with no oversight is disturbing. *************The early reporting that the USDA intends to give her a free walk is just as disturbing. ********************************************One coverup after another. Who of us can believe we are part of the good old boys club as the country is now being run? SPELL IT ,COVERUP.
 
UNLESS :::::::::::::The abuse of power by JoAnn Waterfield in blocking the actions in her agency for such a long time with no oversight is disturbing. *************The early reporting that the USDA intends to give her a free walk is just as disturbing. ********************************************One coverup after another. Who of us can believe we are part of the good old boys club as the country is now being run? SPELL IT ,COVERUP.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top