How About Following the Constitution?!?!

[ocm]

The Constitution: (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2)

He [The President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;

ON THE OTHER HAND

The President:

Source:
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
July 21, 2005
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT ON CAFTA-DR
Organization of American States
Washington, D.C.
10:12 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: "Thank you all. Sientese. (Applause.) Thank you very much for the warm welcome. Thank you to the Hispanic Alliance For Free Trade for inviting me here today. And thanks to the Organization of American States for providing this fantastic forum.

What a beautiful building. What makes it even more beautiful is that the Organization of American States promotes democracy and freedom. There's nothing more beautiful than freedom. And I appreciate your commitment to democracy and freedom. And I appreciate the chance to come to talk about a treaty -- CAFTA -- that will not only provide more prosperity in our hemisphere, it's not only a good deal for American workers and business owners and farmers, this treaty will help spread democracy and peace."

 

[Anonymous]

And this "treaty" gives the big US and multinational corporations protection from being nationalized by a new government ( Condinista- Hondurista or whatever coup comes to be)--- Gives the US the reason to move in and protect the interests of these "international business's"...

Why hasn't Cargill and Tyson spent more in the area to build up the huge unlimited cattle and cropgrowing potential of these countries? Because of the fear of the unstable governments--But CAFTA will give them Big Brother (US Marines) to protect their investments...

More of our tax dollars to go protecting Big Money to compete against the US farmer/rancher citizens

 

[Anonymous]

Did you think you had a point diverter or is this another example of your vivid imagination?


~SH~

 

[agman]

And this "treaty" gives the big US and multinational corporations protection from being nationalized by a new government ( Condinista- Hondurista or whatever coup comes to be)--- Gives the US the reason to move in and protect the interests of these "international business's"...

Why hasn't Cargill and Tyson spent more in the area to build up the huge unlimited cattle and cropgrowing potential of these countries? Because of the fear of the unstable governments--But CAFTA will give them Big Brother (US Marines) to protect their investments...

More of our tax dollars to go protecting Big Money to compete against the US farmer/rancher citizens

Are you not the same OT who has been complaining about the multi-nationals already invested in these countries. Now you question why they have not invest. That is a complete contradiction is it not oh great legal mind from Montana? BTW, have you figured out why you and your pal mates, R-half, keep losing court cases? Contradictions are easy to disclose and dispel in a courtroom.

 

[Anonymous]

And this "treaty" gives the big US and multinational corporations protection from being nationalized by a new government ( Condinista- Hondurista or whatever coup comes to be)--- Gives the US the reason to move in and protect the interests of these "international business's"...

Why hasn't Cargill and Tyson spent more in the area to build up the huge unlimited cattle and cropgrowing potential of these countries? Because of the fear of the unstable governments--But CAFTA will give them Big Brother (US Marines) to protect their investments...

More of our tax dollars to go protecting Big Money to compete against the US farmer/rancher citizens

Are you not the same OT who has been complaining about the multi-nationals already invested in these countries. Now you question why they have not invest.

They have invested- but not too the extent they would like to and will if CAFTA gives them US servicemen protection....Right now we only have OAS- a little shady to go in a take over a government on- but when we get the CAFTA, we will have the political correctness to protect these poor "multinational investors"

 

[agman]

And this "treaty" gives the big US and multinational corporations protection from being nationalized by a new government ( Condinista- Hondurista or whatever coup comes to be)--- Gives the US the reason to move in and protect the interests of these "international business's"...

Why hasn't Cargill and Tyson spent more in the area to build up the huge unlimited cattle and cropgrowing potential of these countries? Because of the fear of the unstable governments--But CAFTA will give them Big Brother (US Marines) to protect their investments...

More of our tax dollars to go protecting Big Money to compete against the US farmer/rancher citizens

Are you not the same OT who has been complaining about the multi-nationals already invested in these countries. Now you question why they have not invest.

They have invested- but not too the extent they would like to and will if CAFTA gives them US servicemen protection....Right now we only have OAS- a little shady to go in a take over a government on- but when we get the CAFTA, we will have the political correctness to protect these poor "multinational investors"

How do you know how much they have invested already and what their plans are? Have you ever been to a board meeting? It is these asssumptions that you make that keep getting you into trouble. What makes you think you know more than they know?

 

[Anonymous]

Are you not the same OT who has been complaining about the multi-nationals already invested in these countries. Now you question why they have not invest.

They have invested- but not too the extent they would like to and will if CAFTA gives them US servicemen protection....Right now we only have OAS- a little shady to go in a take over a government on- but when we get the CAFTA, we will have the political correctness to protect these poor "multinational investors"

How do you know how much they have invested already and what their plans are. Have you ever been to a board meeting? It is these asssumptions that you make that keep getting you into trouble. What makes you think you know more than they know?

Their investments and much of their proposals are laid out on their websites and stockholder reports.......Same as they are with their Australian affiliates.....

 

[Sandhusker]

Did you think you had a point diverter or is this another example of your vivid imagination?


~SH~

Since you are not agreeable to the post, yet can not refute it, did you have a reason to post?

Come on SH, talk is cheap. If ocm is wrong, please fill us in. :shock:

 

[Anonymous]

Sandman,

OCM's post doesn't even make a point!

Before you can determine wrong or right you have to have a point.

Did you actually think that Bush's desire to discuss CAFTA was unconstitutional?


~SH~