• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

IT has been suggested we run a poll

Has Old Timer has been Fair,with his moderating

  • YES

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • NO

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • WHO CARES

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Poll is a complete surprise to me,still tryin to understand it,can one of you folks that voted "NO" direct me to a post that confirms your position,I would appreciate it.
good luck
 
HAY MAKER said:
Poll is a complete surprise to me,still tryin to understand it,can one of you folks that voted "NO" direct me to a post that confirms your position,I would appreciate it.
good luck

http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=39042&highlight=whitewing
 
HAY MAKER said:
Poll is a complete surprise to me,still tryin to understand it,can one of you folks that voted "NO" direct me to a post that confirms your position,I would appreciate it.
good luck

The thing is Haymaker, that some people don't appreciate a mod being so biased about a person's political views, that they become involved in smear campaigns and false accusations, without providing proof.

That is what has chased away quite a few posters. Hard to gain new members when the mods treat them that way, don't you think?

Biased Political views are more than acceptable, but making up stories about those that you do not agree with, kinda ruins the mood.

If Bull Session was moderated like PB, Flounder would be accused of clogging up the forum with fearmongering and Porker would be accused/attacked for being a pig farmer. Not sure who would be the chinese spy, destroying the US with their posts. Everyone else that disagreed with the mod would be accused of being a fake or phony.

But, I'm sure that's a mod's job, and we should be thankful someone is willing to take on the responsibility.

But instead of letting the issue die, why not run your poll, and see what comes of it.

It will entice many new posters to the site, for sure.

Good Luck
 
HAY MAKER said:
RobertMac said:
Not the question, HayMaker...the question is why is he a moderator when he, admittedly, incites the need for moderating?

I think I'll go have a drink with Mike.

If he incites the need for moderating .............is he fair ?
Word it anyway you want,truthfully Robert I am surprised you are involved in this,figgered you alot smarter ...................good luck
Haymaker, I agree, my "smartness" is questionable sometimes, but let me give you something to think about.
Every time you long on, you give this server you computer ip address. Macon has access to that information. There are programs that will find the location of that computer ip address. Why is OT asking Pig Farmer to identify his location when OT already knows it? OT also probably knows whose name the computer was registered in. Why do you think he makes a big deal out of knowing who post under multiple IDs...it's because he knows and tries to use that information to intimidate those he doesn't agree with.
Google data minds this site and builds a profile on each computer ip address. That's how they are able to put up profile specific ads...which is their selling point to advertisers. That's why it doesn't cost us anything for access to this site...you are paying with information. I'm sure Macon has access to this information. The question I'm trying to worm an answer out of Macon is...do the moderators also have access to this information? I wonder if we have a moderator with the integrity to answer this question?

I haven't voted, but I actually don't have a problem with OT's moderating and have said so in the past. As for what he post, I'm still somewhat undecided as to whether he believes everything he post or, as he has said, he does it to "stir things up"...after all, Macon probably gets paid more for more traffic on the site. OT has trashed enough folks that he has no ground to stand on to complain about anyone attacking his family...but I still think those type of attacks are wrong and Pig Farmer shouldn't.

Soapweed said:
A Dollar a day while Makin' Hay. :wink:
Always the word smith. :wink: :lol:
 
I voted, and surprising enough I voted yes, but only because of the wording of the poll.
Is he qualified, yes I think he is qualified.
Worded another way I probabally would have voted differently.
 
RobertMac said:
HAY MAKER said:
RobertMac said:
Not the question, HayMaker...the question is why is he a moderator when he, admittedly, incites the need for moderating?

I think I'll go have a drink with Mike.

If he incites the need for moderating .............is he fair ?
Word it anyway you want,truthfully Robert I am surprised you are involved in this,figgered you alot smarter ...................good luck
Haymaker, I agree, my "smartness" is questionable sometimes, but let me give you something to think about.
Every time you long on, you give this server you computer ip address. Macon has access to that information. There are programs that will find the location of that computer ip address. Why is OT asking Pig Farmer to identify his location when OT already knows it? OT also probably knows whose name the computer was registered in. Why do you think he makes a big deal out of knowing who post under multiple IDs...it's because he knows and tries to use that information to intimidate those he doesn't agree with.
Google data minds this site and builds a profile on each computer ip address. That's how they are able to put up profile specific ads...which is their selling point to advertisers. That's why it doesn't cost us anything for access to this site...you are paying with information. I'm sure Macon has access to this information. The question I'm trying to worm an answer out of Macon is...do the moderators also have access to this information? I wonder if we have a moderator with the integrity to answer this question?

I haven't voted, but I actually don't have a problem with OT's moderating and have said so in the past. As for what he post, I'm still somewhat undecided as to whether he believes everything he post or, as he has said, he does it to "stir things up"...after all, Macon probably gets paid more for more traffic on the site. OT has trashed enough folks that he has no ground to stand on to complain about anyone attacking his family...but I still think those type of attacks are wrong and Pig Farmer shouldn't.

Soapweed said:
A Dollar a day while Makin' Hay. :wink:
Always the word smith. :wink: :lol:

I dont know if your smartness is questionable or not considering how the votes are coming in.I hafta admitt I am surprised and disappointed.
I personally believe a little stirin the pot is acceptable,as long as there is no profanity or personal attacks including a posters family member.
That said I dont believe OT has ever attacked a posters family member or used profanity ?
And differnt views personal or political are what makes a horse race,call it "pot stirin"what if we all had the same opinion,political and personal,all drove ford pickups and all like blonde women etc.be a boring world "variety" is truly the spice of life.
By the same token OT has been cussed accused and had his family attacked thats a fact,of all the voters that have voted "no" only Whitewing so far has shown where OT insinuated he was growing illegal crops,still not a reason to be cussed/accused /called a liar,drunk and sorry SOB,thats the problem I have.
good luck

PS You are right about soap he is a word smith,definetly full of wit :wink:
 
Whitewing said:
HAY MAKER said:
Poll is a complete surprise to me,still tryin to understand it,can one of you folks that voted "NO" direct me to a post that confirms your position,I would appreciate it.
good luck

http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=39042&highlight=whitewing

I appreciate the "link" Whitewing,the insinuation was uncalled for.
good luck
 
HAY MAKER said:
Whitewing said:
HAY MAKER said:
Poll is a complete surprise to me,still tryin to understand it,can one of you folks that voted "NO" direct me to a post that confirms your position,I would appreciate it.
good luck

http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=39042&highlight=whitewing

I appreciate the "link" Whitewing,the insinuation was uncalled for.
good luck

Like I said HM, I can accept getting my chops busted for my political views, that's what politics is all about, always has been.

What took me aback was the totally uncalled-for personal stuff......accusing me of being a liar about where I lived, what I'd done in the past, accusing me of sexual harrassment because I sent a harmless PM to someone, etc.....in so many words, demanding that I post proof of everything I was saying.....and not doing so would only prove I was a liar. Like I said, it was bizarre.

I hadn't come here to cause trouble, I'd come here to learn. The personal stuff got so heated that I considered just pissing on the fire and leaving, but I decided there was no reason to do so. I had as much right as anyone to be here and to state my opinions.
 
hypocritexposer said:
HAY MAKER said:
Poll is a complete surprise to me,still tryin to understand it,can one of you folks that voted "NO" direct me to a post that confirms your position,I would appreciate it.
good luck

The thing is Haymaker, that some people don't appreciate a mod being so biased about a person's political views, that they become involved in smear campaigns and false accusations, without providing proof.

That is what has chased away quite a few posters. Hard to gain new members when the mods treat them that way, don't you think?

Biased Political views are more than acceptable, but making up stories about those that you do not agree with, kinda ruins the mood.

If Bull Session was moderated like PB, Flounder would be accused of clogging up the forum with fearmongering and Porker would be accused/attacked for being a pig farmer. Not sure who would be the chinese spy, destroying the US with their posts. Everyone else that disagreed with the mod would be accused of being a fake or phony.

But, I'm sure that's a mod's job, and we should be thankful someone is willing to take on the responsibility.

But instead of letting the issue die, why not run your poll, and see what comes of it.

It will entice many new posters to the site, for sure.

Good Luck

I guess in a perfect world you could find a person that was interested in politics that had unbiased views,whats the chances we find one and get the administrator to have him/her moderate the political page ?

I respectfully disagree about a moderator with differnt political views chasing anyone anywhere,on the other hand I can guarantee you calling posters Liar/sorry SOB and attacking thier family members will definetly chase them off especially when you have several posters doing it at the same time,I understand how sensitive political discussions can be its the reason I dont talk politics,as a matter of fact their are 3 things a man should never talk about if he is trying to make friends,politics,money and religion,not necessarily in that order .
I know differnt folks come to the boards for differnt reasons,talkin weather ,cattle and a little humor and making a friend or 2 along the way is why I come,whats yours ?
Being a pig farmer you oughta know with certainity.........You get more pigs in the pen throwin corn cobs than you do rocks.
Show a little respect,folks will reciprocate...guaranteed
FWIW..........Flounder has been accused of fear mongering many times,I dont remember him cussed.
Poll will run until everyone has their say,I dont know if you have ever been involved in a poll I run,but always give every man/woman equal opurtunity to vote/voice their opinion,then use cowboy rithmatic to tally the results.
good luck
 
Whitewing said:
HAY MAKER said:
Whitewing said:
http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=39042&highlight=whitewing

I appreciate the "link" Whitewing,the insinuation was uncalled for.
good luck

Like I said HM, I can accept getting my chops busted for my political views, that's what politics is all about, always has been.

What took me aback was the totally uncalled-for personal stuff......accusing me of being a liar about where I lived, what I'd done in the past, accusing me of sexual harrassment because I sent a harmless PM to someone, etc.....in so many words, demanding that I post proof of everything I was saying.....and not doing so would only prove I was a liar. Like I said, it was bizarre.

I hadn't come here to cause trouble, I'd come here to learn. The personal stuff got so heated that I considered just pissing on the fire and leaving, but I decided there was no reason to do so. I had as much right as anyone to be here and to state my opinions.

Whitewing,I have read your posts informative and entertaining for sure,I dont doubt you come here for the very reasons you posted,as a new member especially on the political page folks are going to wonder who you are/where you are,your posts should have satisfied everyone curosity has mine for sure the pictures of your ranch and equipment look first class.
I think you, me and damned near everyone that uses a public forum will be questioned/accused at some time or another seems like its just part of the price you pay to be here, cyber world is full of skeptics not all of them nice...............that said,there is a differnce between what happened to you and what happened to OT.
good luck
 
hopalong said:
I voted, and surprising enough I voted yes, but only because of the wording of the poll.
Is he qualified, yes I think he is qualified.
Worded another way I probabally would have voted differently.

hopalong,the poll was askin if you thought OT was "fair" with his moderating.

Has Old Timer has been Fair,with his moderating
YES
29% [ 16 ]
NO
44% [ 24 ]
WHO CARES
25% [ 14 ]

Total Votes : 54
good luck
 
hypocritexposer said:
So Haymker, how did trying to help your buddy work out?

You should have left it alone, IMHO.

Dont count me out yet,I figger bout Sunday evening poll will close,You know what is disappointing to me is all these folks voting in the negative,and none of them bringing forth any thing to confirm there complaint,one man Whitewing took the time to provide a link to a post where he was wrongly accused.................the rest nuthin,what does that tell you ?
good luck
 
HM, just to give you some "flavor", here's an exchange I had with OT just 2 days after joining this place. And again, other than questioning his logic in another thread on the political forum, I don't believe I had had a cross word with the guy.


http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38712&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=oldtimer&start=12

Oldtimer said:
Whitewing said:
Oldtimer said:
Whitewing

Whitewing


You know the thing that makes me chuckle is that the rightwingernut extremists will jump on board with and backslap an anonymous person that claims/says they are a former residenct of Louisiana and earned their living thru the graces of the good old USA-- but that decided to take their retirement/investment earnings/inheritance and invest in not only a communist country- but probably the most US hating communist country in the western hemisphere-- and the country that has stated most often they want to see the US toppled... :shock: :roll: :???:

And the on top of that tells how well that communist government supports agriculture-- but then chastises and condemns someone in the current US administration they think is communist- while attacking an Obama appointee that has talked in favor of what some believe are socialist ideas...

Reminds me of the hypocritical tyranny that Hypo promotes in his hope to bring down the country :( :(

Well OT, you'll learn as you watch my posting habits that I call 'em like I see 'em, left or right, conservative or liberal.

You make some rather sweeping judgments about my personal life decisions, and what I "claim" to be, without knowing very much about me at all, especially what made me want to settle in Venezuela. Well, she was murdered over two years ago and was the love of my life. Her family (now my family) literally saved my life from the terrible, debilitating depression I sank into after her loss and I'll forever be grateful to them. But that's really a story for another day.

You also make some rather sweeping comments about Chavez and Venezuela, again, probably without fully understanding the history and culture of this country. Venezuela is not a communist country as you claim. Chavez was elected democratically as best anyone can tell. And living here, working with the citizens, I can honestly say that he is on average probably much more respected than Bush ever was or Obama ever will be. I don't agree with much of what he says or does, but I do agree with some of the things he's trying to do to help the poorest of the poor. I need not apologize to anyone for that.

I also note you failed to quote my comments of approval of Obama's decision to embrace and follow much of the Bush/Cheney doctrine as it relates to the war on terror. He surprised me there I must admit, but like I said, I give credit where credit is due.

Even though I don't know you or anyone else here yet for that matter, your post was surprising to me. It's got a really bitter tone to it. I'm not sure what I've done to you to earn such bitterness on your part, other than perhaps not agreeing with you on some political issues. I hope I'm wrong about that bitterness.

Having said all that, you can still count on me to post honestly and can consider me a friend if you so chose. :wink:

Not meant to be bitter- and something that some have discussed with me on PM's since you showed up- and the Hypocrit multi person website is such a tyrannical pushing for the overthrowal of the US government- and noone can figure out where these anonymous folks are coming from.... :???: But I do think its very ironic that you think so highly of the Chavez government- and Chavez-- when the rightwingernuts on this site went absolutely bonkers when Obama dared look at the man or shake his hand when they met at a conference....

So what is your feeling- we should support the overthrowal of- or invade Venuzuela as a communist country - or should we establish a repore with them :???:
 
HAY MAKER said:
hopalong said:
I voted, and surprising enough I voted yes, but only because of the wording of the poll.
Is he qualified, yes I think he is qualified.
Worded another way I probabally would have voted differently.

hopalong,the poll was askin if you thought OT was "fair" with his moderating.

Has Old Timer has been Fair,with his moderating
YES
29% [ 16 ]
NO
44% [ 24 ]
WHO CARES
25% [ 14 ]

Total Votes : 54
good luck

I totally screwed up by going back to vote after first leavong the forum and thinking about it, Looks like I convinced my self that the poll was asking if he was qualified and voted yes!

Can I change my vote??

:D I cannot show you a post backing up my feelings for they were deleted ( there were two of them) quite some time back.

Either way your poll is not going to change anything in any way![/b]
 
HAY MAKER said:
hypocritexposer said:
So Haymker, how did trying to help your buddy work out?

You should have left it alone, IMHO.

Dont count me out yet,I figger bout Sunday evening poll will close,You know what is disappointing to me is all these folks voting in the negative,and none of them bringing forth any thing to confirm there complaint,one man Whitewing took the time to provide a link to a post where he was wrongly accused.................the rest nuthin,what does that tell you ?
good luck


i don't think that those that voted against ot need to explain themselves to you, Hay Maker. same goes for anyone that voted in ot's favor. you asked for a vote, and thats what you are getting. athough the poll is still open, it doesn't look like your buddy will win "hands down". but like someone else said, i doubt anything will change anyways.
 
Justin said:
HAY MAKER said:
hypocritexposer said:
So Haymker, how did trying to help your buddy work out?

You should have left it alone, IMHO.

Dont count me out yet,I figger bout Sunday evening poll will close,You know what is disappointing to me is all these folks voting in the negative,and none of them bringing forth any thing to confirm there complaint,one man Whitewing took the time to provide a link to a post where he was wrongly accused.................the rest nuthin,what does that tell you ?
good luck


i don't think that those that voted against ot need to explain themselves to you, Hay Maker.
same goes for anyone that voted in ot's favor. you asked for a vote, and thats what you are getting. athough the poll is still open, it doesn't look like your buddy will win "hands down". but like someone else said, i doubt anything will change anyways.

#1 Who said they need to do anything,explain or otherwise,the opurtunity is there if desired.
#2 You dont know what you are talking about,Im running this poll,we count at sundown.
#3 We are in agreement here nothing will change because there is nothing that needs changing,except for some folks to show respect.
good luck
 
HAY MAKER said:
Justin said:
HAY MAKER said:
Dont count me out yet,I figger bout Sunday evening poll will close,You know what is disappointing to me is all these folks voting in the negative,and none of them bringing forth any thing to confirm there complaint,one man Whitewing took the time to provide a link to a post where he was wrongly accused.................the rest nuthin,what does that tell you ?
good luck


i don't think that those that voted against ot need to explain themselves to you, Hay Maker.
same goes for anyone that voted in ot's favor. you asked for a vote, and thats what you are getting. athough the poll is still open, it doesn't look like your buddy will win "hands down". but like someone else said, i doubt anything will change anyways.

#1 Who said they need to do anything,explain or otherwise,the opurtunity is there is desired.
#2 You dont know what you are talking about,Im running this poll,we count at sundown.
#3 We are in agreement here nothing will change because there is nothing that needs changing,except for some folks to show respect.
good luck

as a mod, has OT always shown respect??
 
I was under the impression that RESPECT was earned NOT because some one ran a poll :roll: :roll:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top