• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Judy Wilcox's letter concerning Wind Energy

That Ogallala aquifer is a strange and wondrous thing, imo. Is it even known how many sources there are, where they are, and what affects their production? I recall maybe 25-30 years ago hearing of studies by universities, hydrologists, and others who were trying to find the source and one test was putting strong dyes down big sink holes in western SD and maybe neighboring states. They never found where it came out.

Because there are so many caves and caverns under the Black Hills, many not totally explored, and they are 'uphill' from where that water comes out, there just might be underground streams we don't know about, either. And there are large underground bodies of water under quite a lot of territory, including where I live which are known to be sourced somewhere to the west, whether the Black Hills, of further west I don't know. I do know we have a well that produces 90 degree water a couple miles from our house. I believe it is called the Dakota formation. Unfortunately for me, it cools to about 60% by the time it gets to the house. We are not currently using it for anything but cattle water.

There are other interesting uses of that formation, a popular one being the mineral baths at the historic Stroppel Hotel in Midland, SD. Think the temperature there averages about 105%. There us a deeper one called the Madison formation which is much hotter. When the town of Midland used that one, it had to be cooled. Steam would rise from a bath tub, or even a toilet!!! Now we have rural water from the Missouri River, so the old city well is capped, but the hotel has a private well.

mrj
 
Amo said:
Guess here is my 2 cents on some of this. OK, so the main family in this area fighting the R project is claiming erosion that will never heal will happen with construction. I can kinda see that, even though they are putting poles in with helacoptors, some truck traffic will do a little damage. I don't think as much as the opposition is leading on, but its possible. Another thing they complain about is going through a shelter belt. That sucks loosing a shelter belt. At the meeting NPPD gave numbers of corners, poles, miles of line, & total cost of production to the 3 prefered routes. The chosen route of the 3 was the most expensive & had the most corners. Weather that was to try and avoid the most opposition or the route to cause the least amount of problems to land owners is open to inturpertation. They had meeting with each land owner in the coreadoor. Then they wanted to go on the land and survey. Well these people Im sure lawyered up early. Won't let them on their land. Guess Im of the impression that if you would work with NPPD, they would work with you. Maybe they could of worked together. With google earth and everything they shouldn't of needed access to the land, but bull headedness hinders progress. Just my opinion. Of course the power line is ugly. It ruins the natural beauty of the sandhills. It was never here, it shouldn't be hear. That shelterbelt wasn't there in 1876 either. Now yes it provides protection etc, but my point is its not a natural part of the sandhills. Then the good one is their family is married into the plant that manufactures Rowse Rakes. NPPD built a power line 40 some miles to provide enough power to supply their plant....in the middle of said precious sandhills. Now this power line isn't as big as the towers on the R project, but its still a power line through the sandhills, that ruins the "natural beauty" if we are going to be picky. Of course they said well its in the highway right of way, which most of it is...some isn't. Cattle can rub and destroy sod around the poles just like the things they are using to argue against the R project. Just whinning stuff like this is kinda annoying.

I enjoy following this site and the discussions, but was surprised to see someone attempting to smear my family's name. Yes, my family is one of those who are opposed to the proposed R-Project transmission line through the Sandhills. This line was developed by the Southwest Power Pool (SPP), a 14-state regional transmission organization, for the purpose of accommodating large privately owned wind farms who wish to export wind energy into the SPP marketplace. Nebraska is the only all public power state in the US. Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) currently produces nearly 4 times the amount of energy needed for in-state use, and sells that surplus energy in the open marketplace of the SPP. This revenue, which was nearly $100 million last year, is used to offset any potential rate increases to its customers. NPPD and the SPP are both long on energy, and the SPP wind energy market is saturated through at least 2025 (by their own data). NPPD is on track to meet their renewable energy standards, and have no interest in incorporating more wind into their portfolio at this time. Peak load is in the summer, due to irrigation, and the best winds are in the winter, so clearly a more stable baseload generation source such as coal is needed to provide reliable energy. The R-Project is a 345kV transmission line, which is 10 times larger than the largest 115kV lines that currently supply energy in the Sandhills. This line is for exporting privately owned energy...period. The Nebraska Legislature passed LB 824 this spring, removing the requirement for private wind farms to even have a buyer in place for their energy with a power purchase agreement before building. This bill also requires NPPD to build the transmission from these private wind farms to connect to our public power grid, which is what the developers want since public power has the automatic use of eminent domain. So all that leads to this....no energy shortage, no desire of our public power to buy more wind energy because it's too unreliable, but private developers with dollar signs in their eyes, wanting to build inefficient energy generating systems while forcing 150' tall transmission towers across private property with the use of eminent domain. The addition of more large wind farms leads to transmission congestion and reliability issues. The Sandhills are one of the last remaining intact native grasslands in the world. My family has ranched here for 131 years, and are now into the 6th generation. You mention the loss of a shelter belt, but you didn't mention that it is in one of our main calving areas, and spans over 1/2 mile. A large calving barn, corrals, and smaller lots have been carefully and specifically placed behind this cedar/cottonwood grove. This transmission line will remove all of the protection we have from the north winds at this location. We calve out 650 cows, and make use of every bit of protection we have. We have flowing artesian wells, as I'm sure you do, and don't want to have them drill nearly fifty holes 60' deep for foundation screws into the water on our ranch(4 per lattice tower). The proposed route of the R-Project is 75% inaccessible, in many cases at least 3-4 miles from the nearest roads. There are complete townships further west on the route that currently have no roads. NPPD claims they can't stay in their 200 ft easement, so they are also attempting to condemn and create permanent access roads to reach the easement. Eminent domain abuse for private gain is wrong. NPPD acts as if those out here who oppose this project are NIMBY's. Should we apologize for putting our private business needs before the needs of out of state private investors just looking to draw steady cash at our expense for the next 25+ years?
Amo, although I don't personally know you, I do know who you are, but I won't post your name here out of respect. I've been in your area a few times...in fact we bought the hay off of Hamp's place from Darry in 2012. I respect your right to your own opinion, and the next time I see you I'll be glad to let you speculate on my family's business in person.

Devyn Ballagh
Amelia, NE
 
Good read SW. That site alone should make everyone to take pause. Much cheaper to draft a plan dealing with issues than scrambling to repair problems on the fly.
 
Devyn

Id like to clarify some things. First off, I have no clue as to why we use nick names on forums. Im a member of several forums. One of them several guys use there actual names. So for the record Im Gary Nachtman. I can't remember if I have met your or not. I know I met either you or your brother one time when your Dad showed some of your hay ground. Even though I haven't visited with you in person about this issue, I did attend 2 of the land owner meetings at the Chambers Community Center. I attended these meetings for one they were advertised as open to the public and I wanted to be informed as to peoples thoughts/concerns from both sides. I do try to listen to both sides of a topic before I devise an opinion. You may disagree and that's fine. Yes, you have more skin in the game than I do, as it crosses your land...maybe near your houses. It doesn't cross mine. In full disclouser I think Im about 6 miles from the proposed route. If the route potentially got moved north, I could be impacted. I also attendee the open house that NPPD hosted after the final determined route was announced. I listened to you, your wife, and your parents speak sometimes at length about your thoughts and feelings on the proposed route at these meetings. Sorry if you felt I should of talked to you personally, but I felt I had gleaned enough information to determine an opinion. I went on line that night to relax because I was in a slightly bad mood. I could of been more tact full.

After listening to all of the debate over Keystone XL in the last 4-5 years, which I was 4-5 miles from the first proposed route...some legitamite concerns others not so much...I have developed a gag reflex to reasons for opposition that don't make much sense. In full disclouser I was against KXL at first for several reasons. After they changed the route, I became neutral. Mainly due to some of the claims that Bold Nebraska made. Either build or or don't. As to wind frams or the R project for example, in Judy Wilcox's letter stating that the Ogallala Aquafer is getting muddied do to the construction of towers. Im no engineer or bio chemest, but I fail to see a logical reason that coralliates. Or the New Ag Talk thread describing health issues. In my crop insurance travels we make conversation with the insureds as we travel. In Boone & Antolope counties where wind towers are at it make an ease topic. They state they make some noise, but you get use to it. Im sure some don't get use to it, which sucks. When I read something such as the New Ag Talk thread, I kinda have to question some things since Ive visited with satisfied people first hand. Studies are funny things. Look at the debate over Zilmax, but then again there's agent orange. I guess I may be different than some, but looking at the landscape I hardly ever notice power lines for instance, unless I specifically look at them. Same with wind towers etc. I actually find it interesting to go east or north, and see all the high voltage power lines N.E. of Pierre S.D. for example, or wind farms. I realize others find them ugly. I guess I find ugliness a poor excuse to oppose progress, porviding it is progress.

Devyn, Im sure you have done a lot more research on this than I have. I respect your comments as to your opinion as to construction of the R project. Yes Im going off information that NPPD gave at its open houses. This topic came up when we were adjusting for a board member of a REA east of here....Boone county to be exact. I played devils advocate expressed the concerns of land owners such as your self. This conversation was several years ago, I don't remember the exact details but he indicated that it was needed to garuntee an adiquate power supply along with other things. Maybe we both have drank NPPD's "jim jones kool aid" and are guppies.

I wasn't intending to smear you. I like to give discriptive examples, that illistrate as to how I developed my opinion. Of the examples I could use to illistrate....one I couldn't remember enough of the details for me to feel comfortable repeating it. The other was stated at one of the land owner meetings. Even though those meetings were advertised to be public, I felt I shouldn't use that example. Where the other two were said at the NPPD open house. So yes that pretty much left you. Some of my comments in this thread are ment in general, not specifically at you. I didn't mean to belittle your shelterbelt. Since you know where I live, you surely know I have several as well. I don't specifically remember you stating the pivitol importance of the shelterbelt in your comments at the NPPD open house. What I remember was you talking how long it takes to grow one and that they are important, which I agree. Just a common theme to opposing comments was ugliness, not natural, and not on my ground. I used the power line to the plant and shelterbelts as examples to things not natural to the enviorment, and something that was put in either on fence lines or private property to benifit one profit making entity. As stated above I tend to lean towards NPPD's point of view. If they chose to cross my parents property, Id feel Id be helping my fellow citizen insuring the power grid. Will some companies profit, sure. Its a capitolistic economy. If I could put a price on my calves, I wouldn't sell them at cost or less. We will have to agree to disagree.

I don't remember any thing said about hole digging. Im curious as to the concerns about that. Erosion & voltage IMHO are legitmate concerns. I understand about putting your private business first. I have very casually visited with 2 people east of me who had concerns about the project. They worked worked with NPPD and NPPD, according to them were acomidating. Plus at the first round of open houses NPPD mapped any potential building development, shelterbelts, irrigation pivots, etc. They didn't just plot a path and say this is it. Maybe you have a higher number of concerns or they are harder to find a better solution to. I somewhat know your Dad and uncles. Your good people. I was talking about hard to deal with people in general and scuttle butt saying NPPD was hard to deal with vs what I had heard first hand. Yes, I realize scuttle butt is scuttle butt. Through insurance adjusting we deal with difficult people from time to time. Now we do follow procedure and adjust the claim properly with a contagious insured. The chance that we would go the extra mile, isn't as likely to happen.

I think we can both agree, more effort should be put towards storing generated power than generating more power and eminent domain is a powerful law that needs to be used carefully.

Gary Nachtman
Chambers, Nebraska
 
I know from experience that to have a cell phone tower erected you have to jump through hoops of close to 40 different government agencies. State Historical Society, FAA, EPA, and the list goes on & on. The tower site had more core samples & soil profiles taken than Carter's has pills. The State Archeologist was out there monkeying around one day when the wind chill was -30. Any agency could have put the kibosh on the project at any time, and we did have to change the location because the State Historical Society was afraid the Willa Catheterites would be traumatized if they walked out the door of Willa's house and "maybe" saw a tower over half a mile away.

Don't these wind yahoos have to jump through a similar set of hoops?
 
"Don't these wind yahoos have to jump through a similar set of hoops?"

The answer to that is evidently a resounding 'well, maybe......"

Some (hearsay, from good source) have evidently been sited in flyways where so many eagles--and other birds--hit them that they got a guy who's job is to pick them up and get rid of the bodys.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top