• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Just another example

Traveler

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
5,300
Of what a quality product(s) we have......as long as it's in a foreign country. :???:

http://www.usmef.org/news-statistics/member-news-archive/u-s-beef-pork-showcased-in-dominican-republic/

To educate importers and food distributors about the quality, versatility and potential profitability of U.S. beef and pork, USMEF recently participated in the "Taste 2015" tradeshow at the Embajador Hotel in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. Funding support was provided by the USDA Market Access Program (MAP), the Beef Checkoff Program and the Pork Checkoff.

More than 500 food industry representatives from the Dominican Republic and surrounding countries attended the event, which featured presentations by USMEF HRI Manager Julieta Hernandez and USMEF Corporate Chef German Navarrete. The pair shared a new perspective on the use of U.S. ribeye and U.S. pork loin and emphasized the overall quality and safety of U.S. red meat. They also demonstrated proper meat handling techniques and discussed key issues regarding importation of U.S. beef and pork.

"It is important to remind chefs and foodservice managers in the Dominican Republic that U.S. meat is a quality product that guarantees an excellent dish for their customers," said Hernandez. "Taste 2015 was an excellent venue for USMEF to showcase new U.S. meat cuts for hotels and restaurants in the region."

Navarrete noted the show enabled attendees to see the way a U.S. primal can be broken down and how U.S. pork loin can be used to create several different dishes with local flavors.

"All of which raises the profile of U.S. beef and pork products in this region," explained Navarrete.

2015 was an outstanding year for U.S. red meat exports to the Dominican Republic. Through November, pork/pork variety meat exports totaled 21,347 metric tons – up 37 percent year-over-year – valued at $48.9 million (up 13 percent). Beef/beef variety meat exports were up 12 percent in volume to 6,579 metric tons and increased 10 percent in value to $52.8 million.
 
Traveler, don't you want to sell US meats in foreign countries? That is the USMEF (US Meat EXPORT Federation) and it's job is to promote sales of OUR beef, pork, etc. in foreign countries where there may be many other countries competing with us.

There was a recent story on exports, and I believe I saw that tongue was selling for very high prices in Japan, for instance. That probably was leading the 'offal' type meats in price. And doubt it sells well in the USA. While that and heart are things I like, my family won't eat them, and liver isn't an easy sell either. I doubt many families in the USA eat those parts.

However, some of the best and highest quality steaks also sell very well in other countries and I'm glad we have USMEF to promote them.

Don't forget that there are many projects promoting beef to our own citizens. It isn't as if they are being left out.

mrj
 
mrj said:
Traveler, don't you want to sell US meats in foreign countries? That is the USMEF (US Meat EXPORT Federation) and it's job is to promote sales of OUR beef, pork, etc. in foreign countries where there may be many other countries competing with us.

There was a recent story on exports, and I believe I saw that tongue was selling for very high prices in Japan, for instance. That probably was leading the 'offal' type meats in price. And doubt it sells well in the USA. While that and heart are things I like, my family won't eat them, and liver isn't an easy sell either. I doubt many families in the USA eat those parts.

However, some of the best and highest quality steaks also sell very well in other countries and I'm glad we have USMEF to promote them.

Don't forget that there are many projects promoting beef to our own citizens. It isn't as if they are being left out.

mrj
Why in the world would you think I don't want to export US beef, or support the work of the USMEF? Ridiculous. What all of these articles tell me is that these countries at least know where their meat is from and the value of US products is being promoted..........and I'm not talking about the offal. Israel is next. And to Canada's credit, they've gotten China.

Don't forget that there are many projects promoting beef to our own citizens. It isn't as if they are being left out.
What's being left out is a certain bit of information, that obviously the people of even the Dominican Republic have.

http://www.cattletradercenter.com/us-beef-imports-33-2015
 
http://www.usmef.org/news-statistics/member-news-archive/u-s-beefs-quality-promoted-to-consumers-in-uae-kuwait-and-oman/

Customer-ME-2015-Sh-SFW.jpg



http://www.usmef.org/news-statistics/member-news-archive/supermarket-promotions-showcase-u-s-beef-dubai-abu-dhabi/

Dubai-2015-Lifco-supermarket-beef-2-SSFW.jpg


Dubai-2015-Lifco-supermarket-beef-SFW-225.jpg
 
I have a question mrj. You have mentioned the importance of BQA, so how does the co-mingling of meats, especially from Latin America and overseas not take away from that program?
 
First, I sure do believe in the importance of BQA. I also realize that not every US beef producer uses it. And given human nature, some people may not be honest about it. There may be other reasons as well, but it is just a sad fact that not ALL beef produced in the USA is of high quality. What is that consumer going to think when they buy cuts of poor quality beef carrying that 'made in the USA label' proponents of COOL insists is always of top quality???

Isn't it likely that store managers arrange meats of like quality together in the displays? It looks like that is the case in the places I've shopped, though we do have our own beef processed, and I buy beef pretty rarely. Re. the beef from other countries: it is required to have comparable rules for processing, inspections, etc. with the USA system. Isn't it better to work to assure that happens, and that trade is equalized with rules? I really don't believe it is realistic, nor am I sure I want to give up products such as cocoa and coffee, for instance, which aren't grown here, as we would if we closed our borders to products from the rest of the world. Isolationism doesn't seem compatible with freedoms our country is supposed to stand for, imo. I believe a 'trust, but verify' system of at the least, random checking at multiple points in the systems.

I'm also glad that the some of the Beef Check Off projects done in big city stores are in-store demonstrations showing consumers how to pick the right cuts of beef for various recipes so that they will know how to prepare tasty, wholesome meals with various cuts of beef ranging from stew meat and hamburger to roasts and nice steaks. People with little time or opportunity to learn the not so simple art of choosing meat to make the best meal at the price point they are willing to pay, is one of the problems we have taken too long to tackle in a sensible way, imo.

mrj
 
mrj said:
First, I sure do believe in the importance of BQA. I also realize that not every US beef producer uses it. And given human nature, some people may not be honest about it. There may be other reasons as well, but it is just a sad fact that not ALL beef produced in the USA is of high quality. What is that consumer going to think when they buy cuts of poor quality beef carrying that 'made in the USA label' proponents of COOL insists is always of top quality???
I don't believe that " beef carrying that 'made in the USA label' proponents of COOL insists is ALWAYS of top quality" is an accurate statement. Nobody is that dumb. It's about giving consumers information to make an informed choice, especially for those that don't have the means to buy a specialty product. If they want a co-mingled product from a country with a history of Foot and Mouth disease, or not, or something from Nicaragua maybe, withholding information seems dishonest. Quality has to do with grading. I would like to see a better written version of COOL implemented, and a President more willing to actually take some initiative and represent the US interests. Even some designation of "grown in North America", I think would be useful.


Isn't it likely that store managers arrange meats of like quality together in the displays? It looks like that is the case in the places I've shopped, though we do have our own beef processed, and I buy beef pretty rarely. Re. the beef from other countries: it is required to have comparable rules for processing, inspections, etc. with the USA system. Isn't it better to work to assure that happens, and that trade is equalized with rules? I really don't believe it is realistic, nor am I sure I want to give up products such as cocoa and coffee, for instance, which aren't grown here, as we would if we closed our borders to products from the rest of the world. Isolationism doesn't seem compatible with freedoms our country is supposed to stand for, imo. I believe a 'trust, but verify' system of at the least, random checking at multiple points in the systems.


Who said anything about isolationism or giving up products such as coffee and cocoa? That makes no sense. I did, however, just look over a package of Starbucks coffee beans. The only location they gave for their product was Seattle, WA. Pretty sure none of the beans were grown there. Why shouldn't more information be on the label?
I'm also glad that the some of the Beef Check Off projects done in big city stores are in-store demonstrations showing consumers how to pick the right cuts of beef for various recipes so that they will know how to prepare tasty, wholesome meals with various cuts of beef ranging from stew meat and hamburger to roasts and nice steaks. People with little time or opportunity to learn the not so simple art of choosing meat to make the best meal at the price point they are willing to pay, is one of the problems we have taken too long to tackle in a sensible way, imo.

True, and one would hope that the retail prices, and price points that we pick up market share, would start to decline. I hope that the checkoff has some good advertisements in store for the upcoming grilling season.
mrj
 
South Korea loves US beef. Looks like they know what they're getting.

http://www.usmef.org/news-statistics/member-news-archive/u-s-pork-beef-take-center-stage-at-popular-korean-jazz-festival/

Ricky-Kim-model-Jarasum-SFW.jpg


Jarasum-International-Jazz-Festival-2015-SFW.jpg
 
It isn't as if people in the USA have no access to beef indicating country of origin. With considerably more than 100 brands of beef sold in the country, it seems to me private enterprise is the best way to handle 'country of origin'. It seems government reasonably should have oversight or even control of health issues such as inspection of meat processing, while choices such as country of origin are best handled by businesses, with government only having oversight to assure accuracy of any labels.

Re. "North American Beef", I believe the beef industry was pretty well along the way toward that end, until that flawed COOL law fouled things up with added costs due to government mandated labels. No government mandates, just private enterprise giving it a try and letting consumers decide the outcome.

mrj
 
mrj said:
It isn't as if people in the USA have no access to beef indicating country of origin. With considerably more than 100 brands of beef sold in the country, it seems to me private enterprise is the best way to handle 'country of origin'. It seems government reasonably should have oversight or even control of health issues such as inspection of meat processing, while choices such as country of origin are best handled by businesses, with government only having oversight to assure accuracy of any labels.

Re. "North American Beef", I believe the beef industry was pretty well along the way toward that end, until that flawed COOL law fouled things up with added costs due to government mandated labels. No government mandates, just private enterprise giving it a try and letting consumers decide the outcome.

mrj
I don't like laws or government intervention any more than you likely do, but don't think any more information will usually be on a label than what is required. It's unfortunate that the law was written poorly, and that information to the consumer is almost seen as a punishment, rather than a bonus for doing good business.

Many consumers, such as families with children, likely don't have the budget to consume specialty meats with much frequency, or access to locally grown. Yet they're being denied information on a wide variety of foods.

Would you be comfortable feeding your grandchildren Tilapia from China, and not knowing it? I'm making the assumption you know the reports of that during the last decade.

Are you comfortable feeding your family chicken that was processed in China, and not knowing it?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/panosmourdoukoutas/2015/07/19/processing-american-chicken-in-china-smart-business-or-ruthless-profiteering/#77c4cda5637b

Do you care to know if you're buying beef from a country with Foot and Mouth disease, even though NCBA isn't on board with it? http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/08/us/argentina-beef-ban-lifted/

Would you like to know if your fresh produce is from a country that's had recent problems with Ecoli, which has been a big deal at times? I recall a problem with human feces from farm workers, and a number of other such problems.

If you're comfortable with less information, and trust hit and miss government inspections, then that's okay. We just have a difference of opinion.
 
Traveler said:
mrj said:
It isn't as if people in the USA have no access to beef indicating country of origin. With considerably more than 100 brands of beef sold in the country, it seems to me private enterprise is the best way to handle 'country of origin'. It seems government reasonably should have oversight or even control of health issues such as inspection of meat processing, while choices such as country of origin are best handled by businesses, with government only having oversight to assure accuracy of any labels.

Re. "North American Beef", I believe the beef industry was pretty well along the way toward that end, until that flawed COOL law fouled things up with added costs due to government mandated labels. No government mandates, just private enterprise giving it a try and letting consumers decide the outcome.

mrj
I don't like laws or government intervention any more than you likely do, but don't think any more information will usually be on a label than what is required. It's unfortunate that the law was written poorly, and that information to the consumer is almost seen as a punishment, rather than a bonus for doing good business.

x Part of the problem of labeling info probably is government rules which cause higher costs. No surprise that government regs add to costs, is it?

x Many consumers, such as families with children, likely don't have the budget to consume specialty meats with much frequency, or access to locally grown. Yet they're being denied information on a wide variety of foods.

x Maybe we need to coach consumers to ask questions about food before choosing which product to buy. Everyone seems too busy, I guess, both customer and sales people are in a hurry, but that isn't the way it should be.

Would you be comfortable feeding your grandchildren Tilapia from China, and not knowing it? I'm making the assumption you know the reports of that during the last decade.

x I'd prefer NOTHING made in China, but that isn't the way the world is today. I'd also prefer that our govt inspection departments do their job and assure that imported products are safe.

Are you comfortable feeding your family chicken that was processed in China, and not knowing it?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/panosmourdoukoutas/2015/07/19/processing-american-chicken-in-china-smart-business-or-ruthless-profiteering/#77c4cda5637b

x I pretty well stopped buying chicken in stores after learning that it was allowed to absorb water in processing of up to 25% or original weight. I'm not sure that has been stopped yet, though the Beef Check Off and NCBA fought to end that boost poultry producers had by selling water at chicken prices. However, since chicken is usually cooked at high temperatures and/or reaching high enough temperature to kill pathogens, it probably isn't so dangerous as other foods.

x It seems unreasonable that it would be good business to ship chicken such a long distance to process it, so wisdom should preclude that project......but politics seldom includes wisdom, either.

Do you care to know if you're buying beef from a country with Foot and Mouth disease, even though NCBA isn't on board with it? http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/08/us/argentina-beef-ban-lifted/

x Unless that trade includes rules against shipment before a time of the area being free of FMD, I would be absolutely against it.
However, I have eaten at Argentinian and Brazilian style steak houses and it was excellent....but don't know whether it was US beef cooked in that style, or actual product of the country.

Would you like to know if your fresh produce is from a country that's had recent problems with Ecoli, which has been a big deal at times? I recall a problem with human feces from farm workers, and a number of other such problems.

x And, there is the problem of US food workers in restaurants failing to wash their hands after using the bathroom! Why do you think such problems are only in other countries? It's likely that not all foreign farm workers change their habits just because they are working fields in the USA! Maybe more importantly, E coli is carried by many wild animals, from bats to raccoons, and I've read it can be found in irrigation water, too. The good thing about E coli is that cooking at a reasonably high temperature kills that 'bug'. Most food borne illnesses are due to improper handling of food in the home, unfortunately. Teaching proper handling of food at home is the best way to end it. I'd like to see statistics on how much of it can be verified as from imported food. According to a report by a local Veterinarian on food born illnesses, most of it is from eating vegetables, and washing properly would eliminate most of that.

If you're comfortable with less information, and trust hit and miss government inspections, then that's okay. We just have a difference of opinion.

x Probably we won't change much on that score! However, I would like to have all the labeling, etc. IF any of us could afford the costs inherent in government programs.......and trust????? Not much! I just know that private enterprise is better at most anything than the federal government is. Consumers say they want to know farm/ranch of origin. Promoters of COOL absolutely refused to allow that! Some said it was because packers would blame the rancher for any health problems. With that attitude, it's pretty hard to make progress on producing better, healthier beef, imo.

x I believe working to make what we have the best it can be, applying BQA and other information properly, and more widely across ALL segments from seed stock on through to the grocery store, food service, restaurant, and right down to home cooks is the best for us all, from farm to consumer.

x So far as government inspection, imo, that should be limited to what is necessary to assure food safety, accuracy of claims of the grade of the meat made on that USDA label, and not much else.

Sure hope others are having a great day......in spite of winter weather!

mrj
 
x And, there is the problem of US food workers in restaurants failing to wash their hands after using the bathroom! Why do you think such problems are only in other countries? It's likely that not all foreign farm workers change their habits just because they are working fields in the USA! Maybe more importantly, E coli is carried by many wild animals, from bats to raccoons, and I've read it can be found in irrigation water, too. The good thing about E coli is that cooking at a reasonably high temperature kills that 'bug'. Most food borne illnesses are due to improper handling of food in the home, unfortunately. Teaching proper handling of food at home is the best way to end it. I'd like to see statistics on how much of it can be verified as from imported food. According to a report by a local Veterinarian on food born illnesses, most of it is from eating vegetables, and washing properly would eliminate most of that.
Another demerit for China, considering especially how we are under scrutiny for any antibiotic use. http://www.forbes.com/sites/judystone/2015/12/10/new-superbug-resistant-to-all-antibiotics-linked-to-imported-meat/#7d209b14925b

Only is another inaccurate assumption. We have some safe guards and producer oversights that aren't necessarily going to be found in other places. Hopefully, it betters our odds.

http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs51.pdf

th


Unfortunately fresh fruit and salad greens aren't cooked. Be nice to know at least where they're from......as long as it doesn't bring world trade to it's knees. :lol2:
 
http://www.usmef.org/news-statistics/member-news-archive/hri-training-workshop-in-bahrain-introduces-several-u-s-beef-cuts/

Hassan Taleb, USMEF representative in the Middle East, opened the workshop with an overview of the U.S. beef industry and an explanation of the attributes and characteristics of U.S. beef, noting its quality and safety. An educational presentation on specific cuts and cutting techniques followed, with an emphasis on U.S. beef rump, T-bone, ribeye, tenderloin and sirloin.
 
This week South Africa resumed imports of U.S. beef for the first time since the market closed following the December 2003 BSE case. U.S. beef and beef products derived from cattle – of any age – slaughtered after June 24, 2015 are now eligible to ship to South Africa using this letterhead certificate.

http://www.usmef.org/news-statistics/member-news-archive/south-africa-opens-to-u-s-beef-further-updates-expected-on-pork/
 
Jack-O-Shea-Fontegro-2016-Kiev-SFW.jpg


Famous Butcher and Chef Promotes U.S. Beef at 'Congress of Chefs' in Ukraine

http://www.usmef.org/news-statistics/member-news-archive/famous-butcher-and-chef-promotes-u-s-beef-at-congress-of-chefs-in-ukraine/
 
U.S. Beef's Versatility and Value Highlighted at Swedish 'Meat Up'

http://www.usmef.org/news-statistics/member-news-archive/u-s-beefs-versatility-and-value-highlighted-at-swedish-meat-up/

Swedish-Butcher-Hakan-Fallman-SFW.jpg


Sweden-Mark-Evans-Felipe-Macias-2016-SFW.jpg


Sweden-Sample-SFW.jpg
 
Looks like we are doing great job promoting beef!

Thanks for sharing the info.

mrj
 
http://www.usmef.org/news-statistics/member-news-archive/emerging-markets-reveal-positive-signs-for-u-s-red-meat-at-gulfood-2016/

USMEF's participation in Gulfood 2016 wrapped up Thursday following a week of face-to-face meetings with potential customers from the Middle East, Africa, Asia and Europe. The region's largest food show, which attracted about 90,000 people from 170 countries this year, was held in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE). Funding support was provided by the USDA Market Access Program (MAP) and the Beef Checkoff Program.

FAS-Quintin-Gray-Chef-Robin-Gomes-USDA-Alexis-Taylor-SFW.jpg


Gulfood-2016-SFW.jpg
 

Latest posts

Back
Top