• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Reply to thread

Of course the LMA is supporting R-CULT.  That's where most of these packer conspiracies and NCBA conspiracies originated.  The LMA didn't like it when NCBA's checkoff funded strategic alliances program showed that producers could make more money on better cattle buy retaining ownership on them than by selling them in the non value based markerting of the salebarn.  I proved it to myself.  We netted $75 more per head by retaining ownership on our calves that gained 3.4 pounds per day and converted 5.5 pounds of feed to a pound of gain as opposed to selling them in the barn.  That doesn't include the $20 per head we saved on shrink, extra trucking, commission, and the hit we always took on unnecessary sorting.


If the LMA can get a handful of producers to believe they represent the producers as opposed to a producer driven organization, then those producers will follow their LMA pied pipers.


The liberal democratic supporting blamers will follow R-CULT and their conspiracy oriented, anti corporate, emotionally driven, factually void agenda.


Those conservative republican producers who search for the truth, will support the truth, the facts, and the free market system which operates best when free of excessive government regulations.


R-CALF is a joke!



~SH~


What animal is usually the product of a ranch?
Back
Top