• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Manganese binding to prion protein. NEW Paper.

Help Support Ranchers.net:

Kathy

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
837
Reaction score
0
Location
Home on the Range, Alberta
This spanking new paper by Dr. David Brown, et al, Univ. of Bath UK is available free online for your reading convenience. I recommend you take a peak at it.

J Biol Chem. 2008 Mar 10

Manganese binding to the prion protein.

Brazier MW, Davies P, Player E, Marken F, Viles JH, Brown DR.
Biology and Biochemsitry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY.

There is considerable evidence that the prion protein binds copper. However, there have also been suggestions that PrP binds manganese. We used isothermal titration calorimetry to identify the manganese binding sites in wild-type mouse PrP. The protein showed two manganese binding sites with affinities that would bind manganese at concentrations of 63 M and 200 M at pH5.5. This indicates that PrP binds manganese with similar affinity to other know manganese binding proteins. Further study indicated that the main manganese binding site is associated with H95 in the so called "5th site" normally associated with copper binding. Additionally, it was shown that occupancy by copper does not prevent manganese binding. Under these conditions, manganese binding results in an altered conformation of PrP, displacement of copper and altered redox chemistry of the metal-protein complex. Cyclic voltammetric measurements suggest complex redox chemistry involving Mn bound to PrP while Cu bound PrP is able to undergo fully reversible electron cycling. Additionally, Mn binding to PrP converts it to a form able to catalyse aggregation of metal free PrP. These results further support the notion that manganese binding could cause conformation change in PrP and trigger changes in the protein similar to those associated with prion disease.

PMID: 18332141

link to paper:

http://www.jbc.org/cgi/reprint/M709820200v1
 
Any thoughts Terry or Shaft? What do you guys think of the words "in vivo"?



In summary, we have identified the
manganese binding sites in the prion protein
and shown that the high affinity site is
associated with His-95 in the so called 5th
metal binding site. We have show that the
affinity for this site is high for a manganese
binding protein and clearly implies that PrP
could bind manganese in vivo. We also show
Downloaded from www.jbc.org by on March 18, 2008
10
that manganese bound to PrP becomes
oxidised and is able to displace copper that
may already be bound to the protein. As
manganese binding to PrP is detrimental and
causes a conformation change in the protein,
its ability to bind to PrP when copper is still
bound suggests that manganese binding
could potential play a role in prion disease
progression in vivo.
 
"Despite geochemical evidence that high environmental manganese coincides with some clustering of prion disease cases and the cellular and biochemical effect of manganese on PrP, there is currently no evidence that exposure to increased levels of manganese is anything other than a potential risk factor for prion diseases."

What I would like is for someone to explain to me why certain calves fed identical doses of brain homogenate from BSE-infected cattle go on to develop the disease, while others do not. Could manganese be a co-factor? Will Mark Purdey's work turn out to be the beginning of the answer to that question? Beats me, but it doesn't look to be beyond the realm of possibility.

The only thing that appears to be certain at this point in time is that BSE is a feed-borne disease. Virtually every epidemiological study to date confirms the feedborne transmission hypothesis. As I understand it the biochemical mechanisms involved in the BSE disease process are not well characterised. Sounds familiar. Smoking was first affirmatively linked to lung cancer through epidemiological studies decades before the biochemical processes involved began to be characterised in any detail.

Sorry Randy, but "implies that PrP could bind manganese in vivo"? Weasel words. Let's see some in vivo dissection studies. Let's see some differential attack rate studies with and without manganese and/or copper.

"Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."
Matthew 27:41
 
Listen Matthew -- your conventional transmission theory is all about implying and could's as well.

The first part of your post sounded like you were coming around old boy.

Wait a minute - maybe you weren't revealing your real name to us. That 27:41 thing at the end seems belong to something HMMMMM what could it be?
 
Listen Matthew -- your conventional transmission theory is all about implying and could's as well.

Funny thing, old boy, but that is what we commonly refer to as "the scientific method". You develop a theory to explain your observations and then you test that theory until it breaks. Or not.

Since December 1987 when John Wilesmith and his team announced to the world that BSE appeared to be a feedborne disease that theory has been tested. Over and over and over again. 20 years of testing. Hasn't broken yet. Doesn't appear likely to.

Now are you going to tell me that cigarettes don't cause cancer cuz it's a theory based on epidemiology?
 
20 years of testing????? Okeedokee Shaft. Ain't' going to argue with you today. You might dig up something personal on me and post it on the web for all to see. Or worse yet -- find some 27:42 thing that condemns me to hell or something worse...... :twisted:


Have a fine day bud
 
20 years of testing?????

Yes brother Randall, 20 years of testing. Testing the hypothesis that BSE is a feedborne disease, not testing cattle for BSE. You have a one-track mind. Not that I blame you.

If you don't believe me that the worldwide consensus among scientists is that BSE is a feedborne disease (and has been for many years), then check out:

http://www.vetres.org/index.php?option=article&access=standard&Itemid=129&url=/articles/vetres/abs/2008/04/v07232/v07232.html

"In conclusion, epidemiological evidence across several countries suggests that the feedborne source related to MBM is the only substantiated route of infection..."

Plus que ça change, plus que c'est la meme chose.

That's French. You know, your other official language.
 
Hi gang,

The scientists that state "BSE is a food borne disease" need to understand a few concepts.

First, never (EVER) has the brain homogenate been CHARACTERIZED. This means, that the composition (ie: elemental content) of the brain tissue been analyzed. So they don't really know what they are injecting, drenching, or inhaling.

The have, in fact, burned the tissue to temperatures of 600 degress Celcius (thus destroying all PROTEINs) and still been able to "transmit" disease by intracranial injection - demonstrating a reverse concept: "that proteins are NOT the transmissible agent"

Proteins carry metals, some are even called "metallothionines" (excuse spelling if I'm slightly wrong on it)..... Many of these are metal specific carriers.

Another free online paper is very intriguing, because they forced mice to INHALE nanoparticles that were magnetic, and labelled with a fluorescent marker.

The study demonstrates that even though the 50 nm particles were inhaled, not alot showed up in the olfactory system, but they did make it to various organs in the body (in larger amounts) including getting past the blood-brain barrier and the blood-testis barrier.

Copper is not a magnetic metal. Manganese and iron are. In fact, manganese is used big-time for magnetic needs. This study used a ferrite compound. Take a look, there are some good pictures of slides showing the fluorescent marked particles in tissues.

Here's the link to this very good data,

http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/joh/50/1/1/_pdf

J Occup Health. 2008 Jan;50(1):1-6.

Body distribution of inhaled fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles in the mice.

Kwon JT, Hwang SK, Jin H, Kim DS, Minai-Tehrani A, Yoon HJ, Choi M, Yoon TJ, Han DY, Kang YW, Yoon BI, Lee JK, Cho MH.
Laboratory of Toxicology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Reducing the particle size of materials is an efficient and reliable tool for improving the bioavailability of a gene or drug delivery system. In fact, nanotechnology helps in overcoming the limitations of size and can change the outlook of the world regarding science. However, a potential harmful effect of nanomaterial on workers manufacturing nanoparticles is expected in the workplace and the lack of information regarding body distribution of inhaled nanoparticles may pose serious problem. In this study, we addressed this question by studying the body distribution of inhaled nanoparticles in mice using approximately 50-nm fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles (FMNPs) as a model of nanoparticles through nose-only exposure chamber system developed by our group. Scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) analysis revealed that the mice were exposed to FMNPs with a total particle number of 4.89 x 10(5) +/- 2.37 x 10(4)/cm(3) (low concentration) and 9.34 x 10(5) +/- 5.11 x 10(4)/cm(3) (high concentration) for 4 wk (4 h/d, 5 d/wk). The body distribution of FMNPs was examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM) analysis. FMNPs were distributed in various organs, including the liver, testis, spleen, lung and brain. T2-weighted spin-echo MR images showed that FMNPs could penetrate the blood-brain-barrier (BBB). Application of nanotechnologies should not produce adverse effects on human health and the environment. To predict and prevent the potential toxicity of nanomaterials, therefore, extensive studies should be performed under different routes of exposure with different sizes and shapes of nanomaterials.

PMID: 18285638


Their earlier studied, mentioned in the one above is also available free,

however, in this paper the nanoparticles were coated with silica which would have significantly interferred with the magnetic nanoparticles ability to adhere to proteins. The energy of the particle is related to its size, shape and composition. Depending on these factors, some nanoparticles would be more likely to bind to proteins.

Uranium and tungesten for example, are well-known to bind to DNA. Particles of these metals are often used in genetic modification of plants, etc., as the Monsantos of the world, et al., attach fragments of the new (often transgenetic material) DNA to these metal particles and shoot them into cells using a particle gun accelerator.

The noted researchers only followed the intraperitoneal injected mice (below study) for a period of 4 weeks and declared them non-toxic. Guess that's OK if you don't plan to live for very long!! I found this similar tactic used by the manufacturers of the aluminum-laden Gardasil vaccine (for HPV) where they only followed adverse reactions for 14 days.

If anything, these declarations by science demonstrate the absolute necessity of reading the entire paper to make your own judgement. Abstracts represent the findings that the researchers want to push/ or that would best grab attention.


Toxicol Sci. 2006 Jan;89(1):338-47. Epub 2005 Oct 19. Links

Erratum in:
Toxicol Sci. 2006 Mar;90(1):267.
Toxicity and tissue distribution of magnetic nanoparticles in mice.
Kim JS, Yoon TJ, Yu KN, Kim BG, Park SJ, Kim HW, Lee KH, Park SB, Lee JK, Cho MH.
Laboratory of Toxicology, College of Veterinary Medicine and School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea.

The development of technology enables the reduction of material size in science. The use of particle reduction in size from micro to nanoscale not only provides benefits to diverse scientific fields but also poses potential risks to humans and the environment. For the successful application of nanomaterials in bioscience, it is essential to understand the biological fate and potential toxicity of nanoparticles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biological distribution as well as the potential toxicity of magnetic nanoparticles to enable their diverse applications in life science, such as drug development, protein detection, and gene delivery. We recently synthesized biocompatible silica-overcoated magnetic nanoparticles containing rhodamine B isothiocyanate (RITC) within a silica shell of controllable thickness [MNPs@SiO2(RITC)]. In this study, the MNPs@SiO2(RITC) with 50-nm thickness were used as a model nanomaterial. After intraperitoneal administration of MNPs@SiO2(RITC) for 4 weeks into mice, the nanoparticles were detected in the brain, indicating that such nanosized materials can penetrate blood-brain barrier (BBB) without disturbing its function or producing apparent toxicity. After a 4-week observation, MNPs@SiO2(RITC) was still present in various organs without causing apparent toxicity. Taken together, our results demonstrated that magnetic nanoparticles of 50-nm size did not cause apparent toxicity under the experimental conditions of this study.

PMID: 16237191
Sorry, but the link for this paper wouldn't open up for me today. Do a google search.
 
A dissenting scientist, in regards to the food born transmission:

J Inorg Biochem. 2001 Dec 1;87(3):125-7.

Prion diseases: copper deficiency states associated with impaired nitrogen monoxide or carbon monoxide transduction and translocation.

Sorenson JR.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Slot 522, University of Arkansas College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas Medical Sciences Campus, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205-7122, USA. [email protected]

Literature concerning prion diseases and Cu metabolism was examined to determine merits of various suggestions concerning the relationship between these diseases and altered Cu metabolism. There are a number of recent suggestions that the normal non-pathogenic form of the prion protein (PrP(C)) contains Cu while the abnormal pathogenic form of this protein, PrP(SC), lacks Cu. Results of experiments showing oxidant sensitivity in the presence of ionically bonded Cu and millimolar concentrations of hydrogen peroxide were found to lack relevance. Demonstrating superoxide disproportionation and a correlation with cellular Cu2Zn2SOD activity is relevant and consistent with a role for PrP(C) in Cu endocytosis. There are also a number of recent suggestions that PrP(C) has a role in nerve transmission. Serum from mice that lack cellular PrP(C) was found to have an elevated Cu content consistent with a response to overcome an inflammatory disease. Attempts to induce a 'transmissible' form of prion disease requiring intracerebral injections of somewhat purified brain homogenates were found lacking in support for an etiology occurring as the result of oral ingestion of supposedly 'infected' tissues. It is suggested that PrP(C) is a normal Cu-dependent cuproglycoprotein of unknown function that may have a role in facilitating normal nitrogen monoxide- or carbon monoxide-mediated biochemistry.

PMID: 11730893


The prion free mice: in order to create such creatures the prion was necessary for development of the fetus etc. The prion gene is shut off at approximately 6 weeks of age.

The prion free mice are MORE susceptible to oxidative stress.

Again, reverse proof of the vital importance of a healthy functioning prion protein (a cuproglycoprotein, with SOD (antioxidant) activity, necessary for the endocytosis of copper into the cell, necessary for delivery of copper to the internal antioxidant enzymes within the cell) lack of protein or lack of function leads to over-whelming oxidative stress that eventually kills the cell.
 
The have, in fact, burned the tissue to temperatures of 600 degress Celcius (thus destroying all PROTEINs) and still been able to "transmit" disease by intracranial injection - demonstrating a reverse concept: "that proteins are NOT the transmissible agent"

Hi Kathy,

I'd love to see a citation for that if you don't mind. It is new to me.

Your warning about relying on abstracts alone is well-taken. I do not understand the abstract you cite from the December 2001 issue of the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry as seriously disputing the feedborne transmission theory.

Perhaps you would be kind enough to explain exactly what they mean by "somewhat purified"?

In any event, I am not aware of any convincing explanation for the drop in incidence of BSE in the UK following the feed ban, apart from ruminant MBM in feed being the means of transmission. After all, like it or not the UK was and is the biggest BSE experiment in the world. If a model doesn't fit the UK experience on a macro level, then please forgive me if I am not convinced by what any one lab may or may not be able to demonstrate. Reproducibility and peer review is the backbone of good science. Remember cold fusion?

Are you aware of any other epidemiological studies that support an alternate theory of transmission?

I have no dispute with toxicity of metals. Metals may indeed be a co-factor in BSE particularly given that the normal version of the BSE prion binds copper. You may want to have a look at this interesting paper I came across that fits in well with what I take to be the actual conclusion from your 2001 abstract "It is suggested that PrP(C) is a normal Cu-dependent cuproglycoprotein of unknown function that may have a role in facilitating normal nitrogen monoxide- or carbon monoxide-mediated biochemistry."

http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03906.x

Semi-fascinating idea that the normal version of the BSE prion protects against copper toxicity. What happens when the normal version of the prion is converted to the BSE version (PrP(C) to PrP(Sc))? If the protection against copper toxicity is lost then the symptoms of the disease might look like (and actually be) copper poisoning, don't you think?
 
The lack of the prion protein in genetically switched off mice, means the copper is trapped in the blood, unable to enter the cell. The cells are starved of copper, the cells cannot manufacture the copper-loaded proteins that will protect them.

The copper proteins like the prion and CuZn SOD allow for reversible capture and release of oxidative products. This is believed to be a factor in nerve information transfer.

As for reasons for the drop in BSE in the UK, you need to read as much of Mark Purdey's works as you can.

I like to point out that animal derived growth hormone injections/implants were stopped in the late eighties. If these growth hormones in humans transmitted the causative agent? then why not in animals. All this involves however, the pharmaceutical manipulation of proteins from the pituitary gland (a gland that will bioaccumulate toxic metals).

The curves demonstrated for BSE reductions do not necessary represent the real picture either, as hundreds of thousands of animals were destroyed during the 2001 foot and mouth outbreak and burned on creosote soaked Canadian railway ties. None of these FM animals were tested for BSE.

I have no doubt that feeding of bones from animals would have bioaccumulated heavy metals like cadmium, lead, uranium, cesium etc.... in the feed, (as well as bioaccumulating the organophosphate chemical metabolites in the fats); and yes it might have been enough to push the oxidative stress levels to the limit, but the usage of organophosphates (by many of the BSE afflicted nations) for their warble eradication program or other pests, most definitely would have handcuffed the antioxidant enzymes needed to deal with cellular stress. This coinciding usage and disease appearance is well documented, except in the Gabriel Horne Report which lies, and states the program ended in 1982. NO! the UK's official warble eradication program STARTED in 1982.

http://www.markpurdey.com http://www.purdeyenvironment.com

like Mark often stated, if the feed was 'by itself' spreading the disease, then why didn't animals in many of the Meat and Bone Meal importing countries (especially middle eastern countries) have massive cases of BSE also.

There were also many vegetarians that developed vCJD.

I think this disease process is multi-factoral. Saying that lack of copper doesn't cause the disease is a word-game. Susceptibility is important in all diseases.

The prion is a copper binding protein and the replacement of this nonmagnetic element with a magnetic element will lead to a change in tertiary structure under certain circumstances. The magnetic effect, or whatevery you want to call it, ie: Deloncle used UV to "age" the protein, irreverisbly changes the structure/folding - then this protein will not perform its necessary function. Oxidative stress will cascade along the proteins of the cell membrane trying to find a place where this excess energy can escape.

I suggest you study the "Petkau Effect" discovered by Dr. Abram Petkau.

Dr. David R. Brown has many papers on the subject of the cuproglycoprotein, and he is not alone in this thinking.

The ashed protein study:

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Mar 28;97(7):3418-21.

New studies on the heat resistance of hamster-adapted scrapie agent: threshold survival after ashing at 600 degrees C suggests an inorganic template of replication.

Brown P, Rau EH, Johnson BK, Bacote AE, Gibbs CJ Jr, Gajdusek DC.
Laboratory of Central Nervous System Studies, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. [email protected]

One-gram samples from a pool of crude brain tissue from hamsters infected with the 263K strain of hamster-adapted scrapie agent were placed in covered quartz-glass crucibles and exposed for either 5 or 15 min to dry heat at temperatures ranging from 150 degrees C to 1,000 degrees C. Residual infectivity in the treated samples was assayed by the intracerebral inoculation of dilution series into healthy weanling hamsters, which were observed for 10 months; disease transmissions were verified by Western blot testing for proteinase-resistant protein in brains from clinically positive hamsters. Unheated control tissue contained 9.9 log(10)LD(50)/g tissue; after exposure to 150 degrees C, titers equaled or exceeded 6 log(10)LD(50)/g, and after exposure to 300 degrees C, titers equaled or exceeded 4 log(10)LD(50)/g. Exposure to 600 degrees C completely ashed the brain samples, which, when reconstituted with saline to their original weights, transmitted disease to 5 of 35 inoculated hamsters. No transmissions occurred after exposure to 1, 000 degrees C. These results suggest that an inorganic molecular template with a decomposition point near 600 degrees C is capable of nucleating the biological replication of the scrapie agent.

PMID: 10716712

curie points of metals was also brought up by Mark Purdey.
 
Thanks Kathy.

I understand that Mark Purdey's last book (completed by his brother) called 'Animal Pharm' is now available. I will read it.

I understand also that Mark did not contest the prion theory of transmissibility of TSEs. Why can it not be that the healthy form of prion protects against metal poisoning and the protection is lost when the prion transforms to the TSE form?

Is it impossible or unreasonable to believe that both the metals and the TSE prion must co-exist in the animal to cause disease? It makes sense to me, but I learned long ago that making sense to me doesn't count for a whole lot in the general scheme of things. Just ask my wife.

I have heard the argument about the lack of BSE in RMBM importing countries before, with specific refeence to North Africa in particular. However, nobody has yet answered one simple question: was the RMBM incorporated in calf starter in these countries? If it was and there is evidence, I am prepared to concede the point. If not, the mere presence of RMBM has little meaning until and unless it is fed to calves.

How do you explain that the incidence curve for BSE in the EU looks exactly like the incidence curve for the UK? Time-shifted, of course, but same shape. See page 4:

http://www.vetres.org/index.php?option=article&access=standard&Itemid=129&url=/articles/vetres/pdf/2008/04/v07232.pdf

The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences? Never heard of it. That can't be a real journal. You must have made that up.

Just kidding. It's only slightly prestigious. I used to keep the latest copy under my pillow back in the good old days in the hopes that some knowledge might seap into my head while I slept. Not much success on that score, I'm afraid. Interesting that the authors of this particular study specifically postulated in some depth a number of explanations for their results that would preserve the prion model.

"At the comparatively low combustion temperature of 600°C and with limited oxygen penetration into the crucibles, it is remotely possible that some of the organic molecules originally present might have escaped destruction. Incomplete combustion of organic compounds also would be likely to introduce pyrolysis products and elemental carbon into the combustion residues, which probably was responsible for their black color. Carbon has been reported to partially protect TSE infectivity at autoclave temperatures (23). If even a few PrP lattice ''ghosts'' survived combustion, perhaps protected by carbon, they might be sufficient to account for the trace amount of infectivity in tissue combusted at 600°C, whereas at 1,000°C, the thermal degradation and oxidation processes would have been pushed beyond the point at which any survival was possible. The clearing of the black residue and smoke from crucibles at 1,000°C suggests that most of the carbon and other dark-colored pyrolysis products had been oxidized.

An alternative explanation is that an inorganic replica of the necessary molecular geometry was made, which nucleated the conformational change of the PrP precursor protein to its infectious, b-pleated isoform (1, 24, 25), similar to the heteronucleation by minerals of many protein crystallizations (26, 27). Engineers in material science have succeeded in directing the morphological pattern of inorganic crystals and noncrystalline solids by the interaction of organic templates with inorganic
minerals to produce high-order coorganization states of consolidated matter (28–30). They are making micromolecular sieves of zeolites, silica, and aluminum silicates, as well as of other minerals with pore size and connectivity determined by the organic templates. The organic molecules are later removed from these organic–inorganic complexes by calcination or heating to 600°C, leaving a microporous or mesoporous replica in silica or alumina silicates (8, 31). Biomineralization of single-cell
organisms and bacterial fibrils has been achieved in what is essentially a molecular tectonics of macromolecular organization (8, 9).

Even enzyme-mimicking inorganic materials can be made by template catalysts such as amorphous metal oxides and zeolites. Such templates are chemically coded surfaces transcribed at the molecular level into inorganic nuclei with highly specific structural, orientational, and positional properties. Inorganic selfassembly of the organic architecture results from repetition of these processes in association with outgrowth along and within the organic template, creating inorganic–organic hybrids with nano-, micro-, and macroscale patterns. The low levels of infectivity found to survive long exposures to temperatures over 300°C after rapid reduction of infectivity titers by many orders of magnitude may be accounted for by a similar formation of inorganic ''fossil templates'' of organic amyloid nucleants."

As you say, it is indeed perilous to rely upon the abstract alone.
 
So Shaft, what is your take on the HP vaccine Gardasil containing such massive amounts of amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulfate adjuvant?

While some of the adjuvant is bound with fragments of virus protein, there is far more adjuvant that is injected that is NOT bound to any protein (ie: it is all by itself).

You commented:
"Even enzyme-mimicking inorganic materials can be made by template catalysts such as amorphous metal oxides and zeolites
"

http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil/gardasil_pi.pdf

Here is news story that equates the Gardasil vaccine/depleted uranium and oral cancer. I'm not sure if the links work, several articles of this nature have been sent to me via email.

It seems the 'authorities' will do anythiing (including insulting the morals of our troops), to give alternative excuses for the aggressive cancers that now, and into the future, will attack them.

http://bubbaepx.stmhost.com/2008/03/09/oral-cancer-in-us-soldiers-soldiers-vs-oral-sex-and-gardasil/

March 9, 2008

http://ahrp.blogspot.com/2007/08/oral-cancer-in-us-soldiers-soldiers-vs.html
Oral Cancer in US Soldiers Soldiers vs Oral Sex and Gardasil

ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION, August 27, 2007

A report in the Arizona Daily Star describes in gruesome details of "a bizarrely aggressive oral cancer rarely seen by doctors."
Soldiers who had served in combat zones in Iraq are dying of cancer of the mouth, which until now, overwhelmingly strikes smokers, drinkers and tobacco chewers. But the soldiers who are afflicted with cancers of the mouth do not fit that at risk profile: "These are kids 19, 20 and 21 getting all kinds of cancers. The Walter Reed Army Medical Center cancer ward is packed full with them." The doctors are stumped: "Jim's doctors didn't know why he would get this kind of cancer — they had no answers for us."

The prime causal suspect in the minds of many victims — and some scientists–for the alarming number of Iraq war vets who are dying at record speed " is what's known as depleted uranium (UD)— the radioactive chemical prized by the military for its ability to penetrate armored vehicles. When munitions explode, the substance hits the air as fine dust, easily inhaled.

Last month, the Iraqi environment minister blamed the tons of the chemical dropped during the war's "shock and awe" campaign for a surge of cancer cases across the country.

The Daily Star reports that the ranks of sickened and dying Iraq war vets and their families who believe exposures to toxic poisons in the war zone are behind their illnesses — –is growing. But the military brass withholds information and denies the link repeating the Vietnam Agent Orange scenario: "the number of these cancers remains undisclosed, with military officials citing patient privacy issues, as well as lack of evidence the cases are linked to conditions in the war zone. The U.S. Congress has ordered a probe of suspect toxins and may soon begin widespread testing of our armed forces."

Bloomberg News reports that Merck, a major contributor to the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, and two of its researchers are promoting stepped up studies of the HPV vaccine in boys "to expand the vaccine's use."

The two researchers, Drs. Erich Sturgis and Paul Cinciripini provide the marketing pitch for vaccinating boys with the HPV vaccine in an upcoming article in the journal, Cancer. [1] They claim that oral sex "Changing sexual practices such as more frequent oral sex in adolescents and young adults could contribute to an increase in oncogenic HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers," researchers said in the report.

Notice, "could contribute" rather than has been proven to contribute….
Indeed, although the HPV vaccine is being offered to males in Australia, Mexico, there is, as yet, no clinical proof that it works to prevent HPV infection in men: " we have no data to confirm that, and we won't have any in the near future," says Debbie Saslow, PhD, of the American Cancer Society.
http://www.webmd.com/sexual-conditions/hpv-genital-warts/news/20070827/hpv-linked-to-throat-cancer-trend?src=RSS_PUBLIC

Clearly, lack of evidence does nothing to prevent researchers, with financial ties to vaccine manufacturers, from making
unsubstantiated claims:
"The best way to reduce cancer-causing HPV is to widen the pool of children vaccinated with Gardasil."

This is a blatant example of academics promoting corporate marketing claims to dictate medical practice. Industry analysts provide a more convincing motivation for the promoting expanded use of the vaccine. By adding boys to the vaccine pool, Gardasil may generate more than $3 billion in annual sales. Not surprising, Merck's spokeswoman said Merck is studying the shot in boys and plans to seek U.S. approval for that use.
Reference:
[1] Sturgis EM, Cinciripini PM "Trends in Head and Neck Cancer Incidence in Relation to Smoking Prevalence: An Emerging
Epidemic of Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cancers?" Cancer 2007;110.


If I didn't mention before, Dr. Neil Cashman, a prion researcher in Canada, stated that "we are looking at a process of crystallization". When I pushed him for an answer to the question, "what is the smallest unit responsible for "transmission of disease?". His response was 6 malformed prion proteins.

Not one. Not two. Not three. Not four. Not five. SIX. How does this answer explain "infectivity of a protein"? It doesn't. It explains that it takes a fibril. It is the hypothesis of Dr. Vitaly Vodyanoy of Auburn University in Alabama, and others in their own ways, that the proteins are nucleating on metals (copper not being one of these rogue metals).

I didn't have the opportunity to ask Cashmen if his SIX protein/unit was: two units of three stacked on top of each other, or one hexamer nucleated in one flat template. Thinking about polarization, it is most likely two stacked units (a fibril).

What will happen with the aluminum in the Gardasil vaccine? What proteins are these swarms of metal adjuvant going to nucleate?
 
Check out this USA patent application which is submitted by BSE epidimiologist John Collinge, and Charles Weissman (UK) et al.:

United States Patent Application 20080108085
Kind Code A1
Enari; Masato ; et al. May 8, 2008

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Method and Detection of the Presence of Prions Protein


Abstract
The invention relates to methods for determining the presence of prions in a tissue/organ or fluid therefrom; said method comprising the steps of: contacting the tissue/organ with one or more devices, wherein said devices are capable of binding prions; removing said devices from contact with said tissue/organ; determining if said devices are binding prions wherein the device is contacted with the tissue/organ for 120 minutes.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inventors: Enari; Masato; (Tokyo, JP) ; Flechsig; Eckhard; (Wurzburg, DE) ; Collinge; John; (London, GB) ; Weissmann; Charles; (London, GB)


jist of this application is that metal wires, preferrably wires smaller than 1 mm are capable of sequestering, or attaching to prions.

partial
Claims:

1. A method for detecting the presence of prions in a tissue/organ; said method comprising the steps of: (a) contacting the tissue/organ with a device, wherein said device is capable of binding prions; and (b) removing said device from contact with said tissue/organ; and (c) determining if said device is binding prions.

2. A non-invasive method for detecting the presence of prions in a tissue/organ; said method comprising the steps of: (a) contacting the tissue/organ with a device, wherein said device is capable of binding prions; (b) removing said device from contact with said tissue/organ; and (c) determining if said device is binding prions.

3. A method according to claim 1 wherein the device is capable of preserving prions against degradation.

4. A method according to claim 1 wherein the tissue/organ is a mammalian tissue/organ.

5. A method according to claim 4 wherein the tissue/organ is a livestock or a human tissue/organ.

6. A method according to claim 1 wherein the tissue/organ is an tissue/organ in which prions accumulate.

7. A method according to claim 6 wherein the tissue/organ is selected from brain, spleen, lymph node or tonsil.

8. A method according to claim 1 wherein the device comprises metal.

9. A method according to claim 8 wherein the metal comprises one or more metal(s) selected from the group consisting of steel, stainless steel, silver, gold or combinations thereof.

..... some key parts in Description:

[0004] Usually, diagnosis in humans relies on histopathology and immunohistochemical determination. Further methods for the diagnosis of prion infection require invasive procedures such as brain or tonsil biopsies. Homogenates of these biopsies are injected into the brains of test animals such as mice. If the test animals develop clinical symptoms of prion infection then the brain of the test animal is further examined to confirm that prions are present. Problems associated with this method are that prions contained within the biopsies are subject to degradation. Consequently, infectivity is usually lost within 24 hours.

...

[0006] The present invention provides methods for the detection of prions in a tissue/organ or fluid therefrom. The methods use a device such as a metal wire that is contacted with the tissue/organ. Surprisingly, the device is capable of binding prions within 5 minutes. The device is then removed from contact with the tissue/organ. Surprisingly, the device is able to preserve prions against degradation for greater than 3 days. Using prior art methods, prions degrade after only 24 hours. To determine if the device is binding prions, a number of different methods can be used as discussed below. Since prions bind to the device much faster than previously known, diagnosis of prion infection is significantly quicker than prior art methods.

[0007] According to the first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for detecting the presence of prions in a tissue/organ; said method comprising the steps of: contacting the tissue/organ with a device, wherein said device is capable of binding prions; removing said device from contact with said tissue/organ; and determining if said device is binding prions.

[0008] According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a non-invasive method for determining the presence of prions in a tissue/organ; said method comprising the steps of: contacting the tissue/organ with a device, wherein said device is capable of binding prions; removing said device from contact with said tissue/organ; and determining if said device is binding prions. Preferably, said intact tissue/organ is left at least substantially intact by said non-invasive method.

[0009] The device used in the methods of the present invention advantageously preserves prions against degradation.

NOTE: the device is a metal wire, in this patent application said to be steel, stainless steel, silver, gold or an alloy of these metals.

[0012] The device of the present invention may comprise one or more metals or may comprise plastic such as polystyrene, or glass. It is surprisingly disclosed herein that these materials bind prion protein. Preferably, the device of the present invention may comprise one or more metals. Preferably, the metal is any one or more of the metals selected from the group consisting of steel, stainless steel, silver, gold or combinations thereof. More preferably, the metal is stainless steel.

[0013] Advantageously, the device of the present invention may comprise one or more wires or spheres of diameter less than 5 mm, preferably less than 1 mm, preferably having dimensions as mentioned in the Examples section. Preferably, the device comprises one or more metal wires.

....

[0072] The binding between metals and prions may occur by any form of binding capable of occurring between metals and proteins such as covalent, ionic, Van Der Waals, transient or reversible association, or any other forms of binding interaction.

Preserving Prions

[0073] As used herein, the term "preserving prions" refers to the surprising finding disclosed in the present invention that when prions bind to metal surfaces they are preserved. As used herein, the term "preserved" means that the prions bound to the metal surface are protected against degradation and thus remain infective for a period of time that is longer than would normally be expected. For example, using prior art methods, prions injected into brain remain infective for about 24 hours only. Using the methods of the present invention, prions bound to a metal surface are advantageously preserved in barin for at least 3 days.

[0074] Advantageously, the device may be incubated at a temperature of about -20.degree. C. to further preserve the prions. The preservation may be further enhanced by any action which helps protect prions against degradation such as preventing prions from contacting proteases or preventing prions from contacting phagocytic cells.


[0079] Preferably, the device comprises one or more needles, spatula, pins, wires or spheres. More preferably, the device comprises one or more wires. Most preferably, the device comprises one or wires each measuring about 0.15 mm in diameter and 5 mm in length, such as stainless steel suture monofilament wire available from Braun MelsungerAG, Germany.

.....

[0291] Why are wire-bound prions as infectious as concentrated homogenates? Upon intracerebral inoculation with brain homogenate, infectivity is rapidly distributed throughout the mouse (18) and after 4 days or less prions are no longer detectable in the brain (19). Perhaps wire-bound prions are more stable and can therefore act over a longer period of time.



It is well known that the scrapie associated "fibril" is required for transmission of disease (experimental case studies)....

Therefore, this patent application by these UK prion "experts" demonstrates that the "partially malformed protein" will readily degrade in the phagocytic cells and within 24 hours, UNLESS the mechanisms to degrade them are depleted or gone, or UNLESS the partially misfolded proteins attach to metal spheres or wires that are "preferably less than 1mm".

That's a knock-out punch for Ms. Leuren Moret, and for Dr. Vitaly Vodyanoy.

Clearly, the disturbance of the brain by the metal wires/implants resulted in an upregulation of PrPC to protect the cells from the metal ions shedding from the wire. This up-regulation at the site of the wire resulted in the prion binding to the stainless steel - as the METALS in the wires were oxidized / ionized.

Thought I'd let you know about some of the mice that are tettering on the edge of the ships bridge - getting ready to jump ship.

This USA patent application clearly demonstrates the capability of metal wires or METAL SPHERES - just like depleted uranium (or DU alloys), at being able to nucleate proteins, in this case PrPC before the copper is adequately attached at all its normal binding locals.

Let's see the experiments with the "more dangerous" metals.
 
Lots of folks have read this new information about the so-called infectivity of the prion protein, but I am amazed that flounder or others have not commented.

Surely, this attempt to patent information which is, and has been, known about how the prion protein (among many proteins) is misfolded when the inappropriate metals attach to it - should be shattering to those that want to blame the meat industry for causing human disease.

In the cases which Collinge and Weissman are trying to refer (ie: surgical work, like brain surgery).... it is evident in their patent that the medical instruments made of these metals are releasing metal ions into the tissue of the patient. Especially in brain surgery, that can last for hours and hours.

They state that only 5 minutes of exposure to the metal is capable of corrupting proteins. I have seen evidence that the medical profession is working on coating these metal instruments with a silicon material to prevent this from happening.

Further evidence of contamination of the blood with metals caused by those undergoing dialysis, also speaks to the "iatrogenic" contamination of blood by man's tools. But, instead of admitting problems and just fixing them, they have decided to blame our meat for all the problems that have resulted from these interventions.

Is this criminal? Well, once these guys knew what was happening and failed to admit it, it became criminal. Now, they are scared to face the music and potentially criminal liability.

Between Vitaly Vodyanoy's patent application 20070122799 and now this patent application by John Collinge and Charles Weissman 20080108085, there can be no doubt that metals are corrupting these proteins; these proteins would normally be degraded by enzymes - but the rogue metals that attach to them (not just the prion protein) has lead to the disease processes that follow.

The silence is deafening!
 

Latest posts

Top