Military to oath to President, and not to Constituition

[badaxemoo]

Amazing!

Alice

This thread is nothing.

Check out this one!

http://www.ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31500

Their reality is lapping our satire!

 

[Sandhusker]

And here I thought you were actually going to bring something. :shock:


Soooooo, Alice, why did you say that?

What? Like a casserole, or sumthin'? You were an ex husband in a past life, weren't ya'. And, I know which One!!!!

Go away...go far, far away!

Alice

You're a fibber in this life, Alice. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[alice]

This thread is nothing.

Check out this one!

http://www.ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=31500

Their reality is lapping our satire!

It is amazing. You said he had presented it. I asked when - and you've never answered. Something made you say that he had brought it......

Amazing...and totally tiresome.

Alice

Gotta admit...that was a real trip...for someone... :?

Alice

 

[Anonymous]

Did you go to the site badaxemoo cited? It is clearly labeled SATIRE lol :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Don't screw with the minds of the rightwingnuts-- if its an e-mail against Obama or Democrats- it has to be the Gospel-- altho during the Rove type campaign 95% of them were proven false-- they don't want to hear its false..... Screws with the Rush, drug addiction, mentality... :wink:

 

[Tam]

Did you go to the site badaxemoo cited? It is clearly labeled SATIRE lol :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Don't screw with the minds of the rightwingnuts-- if its an e-mail against Obama or Democrats- it has to be the Gospel-- altho during the Rove type campaign 95% of them were proven false-- they don't want to hear its false..... Screws with the Rush, drug addiction, mentality... :wink:

You mean like your claims here on Ranchers in support of Obama the modern day Robin Hood and his merry band of tax cheats :wink:

 

[Ben H]

I don't want to hear things that are proven false, I appreciate that people get the facts together before posting something, even if it's an argument for the side I believe in, it hurts the reputation of that person and for the people that claim to be on the same "side".

This is why I listen to Glenn Beck, he has a team of researchers, I think like twenty something, who's job is to dig and find the truth behind what he goes on the air with. Conservative talk radio has to go by a different standard, they have to have their facts straight before presenting them. They won't get let off the hook if their facts aren't straight.

 

[Ben H]

I can't take credit for it being my idea, as a Glenn Beck listener, he tells his audience to not just take his word for things, to go out and find information for themselves, verify. You have a lot more power to argue if you can back up what your saying by citing the source.

 

[Sandhusker]

You're attacking the messenger instead of the message, Reader. Why not address the facts of the case?

 

[Sandhusker]

We established that the message was a satire Husker. You can go look up satire.

I'm talking about the Obama birth certificate deal. Take a look at the facts, not who started the lawsuits, and the only rational explaination is that Obama is hiding something.

 

[Sandhusker]

I was using that as an example of checking the sources of those who dredge up / invent the stories that get posted in PB.

Puhleese, I was not debating the birth certificate. That is one death horse and was the moment it left the gate.

Of course you won't debate the birth certificate deal, all the facts are on the other side.

 

[Tam]

I was using that as an example of checking the sources of those who dredge up / invent the stories that get posted in PB.

Puhleese, I was not debating the birth certificate. That is one death horse and was the moment it left the gate.

How many lawsuits were files on this dead horse Reader and are still being filed and who filed them it wasn't just Berg. There have been polls taken that say voters want to know the truth so should the facts not come out. How many hundreds of thousands of dollars have been spent on this dead horse when it could have all been cleared up with $12? I throught Obama wanted to unite the country But I guess that is just talk. :roll:

 

[Sandhusker]

I was using that as an example of checking the sources of those who dredge up / invent the stories that get posted in PB.

Puhleese, I was not debating the birth certificate. That is one death horse and was the moment it left the gate.

How many lawsuits were files on this dead horse Reader and are still being filed and who filed them it wasn't just Berg. There have been polls taken that say voters want to know the truth so should the facts not come out. How many hundreds of thousands of dollars have been spent on this dead horse when it could have all been cleared up with $12? I throught Obama wanted to unite the country But I guess that is just talk. :roll:

Then there's that issue of transpancy....

 

[Tam]

I was using that as an example of checking the sources of those who dredge up / invent the stories that get posted in PB.

Puhleese, I was not debating the birth certificate. That is one death horse and was the moment it left the gate.

Of course you won't debate the birth certificate deal, all the facts are on the other side.

Don't you just love it, she brings something up, then when asked about it she runs from the debate, with her hands over her eyes so she doesn't have to see the facts The Democrats are like monkeys not donkeys as they are all see no evil hear no evil speak on evil. Unless the evil is about Bush :roll: :roll: :roll:

 

[hypocritexposer]

Haha Tammy, better to run from pointless debates that have already been debated up the wazoo

Not one court has heard the evidence, how can you consider that a debate?

The courts are there for a reason, let them hear the evidence, and get this issue out of the way?

 

[Sandhusker]

Haha Tammy, better to run from pointless debates that have already been debated up the wazoo than to repeat oneself over and over again like some here :wink:

It really hasn't been "debated". There's been discussion "up the wazoo', but no debate. The facts have been brought up by those who want to know the truth, but liberals won't even acknowledge the facts.

For example; What is the reasoning behind spending thousands and thousands on lawyers to keep a legitimate certificate hidden instead of the pennies it would take to bring it out to the light of day? Lets debate the reasoning behind that fact that that is exactly what Obama is doing.

 

[Anonymous]

I can just see it- 30 years from now in some rest home in Podunk Nebraska the nurses will all be standing around asking each other "whys that nutty old banker keep ranting about a birth certificate- and socialist conspiracies- and looking under his bed for some boogeyman he calls Obama".... :???: :wink: :lol:

 

[Sandhusker]

I can just see it- 30 years from now in some rest home in Podunk Nebraska the nurses will all be standing around asking each other "whys that nutty old banker keep ranting about a birth certificate- and socialist conspiracies- and looking under his bed for some boogeyman he calls Obama".... :???: :wink: :lol:

A prime example of what I meant by liberals not even acknowledging the facts. The very next post.

 

[Tam]

I can't take credit for it being my idea, as a Glenn Beck listener, he tells his audience to not just take his word for things, to go out and find information for themselves, verify. You have a lot more power to argue if you can back up what your saying by citing the source.

I agree with you on Glenn Beck it is refreshing to see somebody that will dig for the truth and tell it like it is.

And you are right about this Conservative talk radio has to go by a different standard, they have to have their facts straight before presenting them.

You know they are telling the truth when Obama and the Dems are looking to close them down. Obama has done more harm to himself by jabbing sticks at Rush and Hannity than anyone. Every time he mentions them more people listen to them to hear what they are saying that Obama is so mad about.

I heard the Rush /Hannity interview and I agree with Rush He said he wanted Obama to fail but the reason was because if he succeeds with his policies the US will changed forever and it won't be for the better. There will be huge government programs resulting in huge government spending resulting in Huge tax increases which will kill the US economy.
This stimulus package filled with pork is just the tip of the iceberg. It is filled with money for new programs that are not going to be dropped once the economy rebounds if it ever does if the US keeps spending money. they don't have. So why wouldn't any tax paying American not want him to fail?

 

[Tam]

I can just see it- 30 years from now in some rest home in Podunk Nebraska the nurses will all be standing around asking each other "whys that nutty old banker keep ranting about a birth certificate- and socialist conspiracies- and looking under his bed for some boogeyman he calls Obama".... :???: :wink: :lol:

A prime example of what I meant by liberals not even acknowledging the facts. The very next post.

You are right they will not bring anything to the table for a debate but how can they? It is insane to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to stop anyone from see his BC. if he has nothing to hide.
In truth liberal form they dismiss and distract with crap. :roll:

BTW Oldtimer have you found any evidence proving Obama is having Geithner jerking back the Bail Out money?