• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Nelson to halt Japanese beef

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
18,486
Location
Nebraska
Nelson aims to halt beef from Japan

BY BILL HORD



WORLD-HERALD BUREAU

LINCOLN - On the eve of a self-imposed deadline, Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., said Wednesday that he will propose legislation on Monday to halt U.S. imports of Japanese beef.


Sen. Ben Nelson speaks to reporters.

Nelson told Japanese officials in April that his patience would run out today if the country had not yet reopened its borders to U.S. beef.

"Although progress has been made, I'm still disappointed that we don't yet have a final resolution," Nelson said at a press conference at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln's Food Processing Center.

"This is about fairness. Our beef is safe, and trade should resume immediately."

The United States imports little beef from Japan, according to Lynn Heinze, a spokesman for the U.S. Meat Export Federation in Denver. "It's a few thousand pounds for a niche market."

Most of the Japanese imports go to U.S. restaurants where Kobe beef is served. Beef from the Kobe region of Japan is considered a delicacy in that country, with heavily marbled steaks costing as much as $300 apiece.

Nelson said it didn't matter if the imports were a "pittance."

"It's about a principle," he said.

In contrast to meager imports of Japanese beef by the United States, Japan imported more than $1 billion worth of U.S. beef in 2003. Nelson said Nebraska's beef industry has lost more than $800 million in sales because of Japan's import bans.

Japan imposed a ban when the first case of mad cow disease was discovered in the United States in December 2003. Shortly after the ban was lifted two years later, the discovery of bone matter in boneless beef prompted a renewed ban.

Nelson said the bone issue was a matter of compliance, not food safety, and should not have resulted in an embargo.

Under Nelson's proposal, Japan would be given 30 days to restore trade before imports would be halted. A similar proposal by Nelson last fall, before Japan briefly resumed beef trade, was adopted by the Senate, 72-26.

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns said earlier this week he was hopeful that Japan would lift the ban before the Japanese prime minister visits Washington, D.C., this month.
 
Sandhusker said:
Nelson aims to halt beef from Japan

BY BILL HORD



WORLD-HERALD BUREAU

LINCOLN - On the eve of a self-imposed deadline, Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., said Wednesday that he will propose legislation on Monday to halt U.S. imports of Japanese beef.


Sen. Ben Nelson speaks to reporters.

Nelson told Japanese officials in April that his patience would run out today if the country had not yet reopened its borders to U.S. beef.

"Although progress has been made, I'm still disappointed that we don't yet have a final resolution," Nelson said at a press conference at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln's Food Processing Center.

"This is about fairness. Our beef is safe, and trade should resume immediately."

The United States imports little beef from Japan, according to Lynn Heinze, a spokesman for the U.S. Meat Export Federation in Denver. "It's a few thousand pounds for a niche market."

Most of the Japanese imports go to U.S. restaurants where Kobe beef is served. Beef from the Kobe region of Japan is considered a delicacy in that country, with heavily marbled steaks costing as much as $300 apiece.

Nelson said it didn't matter if the imports were a "pittance."

"It's about a principle," he said.

In contrast to meager imports of Japanese beef by the United States, Japan imported more than $1 billion worth of U.S. beef in 2003. Nelson said Nebraska's beef industry has lost more than $800 million in sales because of Japan's import bans.

Japan imposed a ban when the first case of mad cow disease was discovered in the United States in December 2003. Shortly after the ban was lifted two years later, the discovery of bone matter in boneless beef prompted a renewed ban.

Nelson said the bone issue was a matter of compliance, not food safety, and should not have resulted in an embargo.

Under Nelson's proposal, Japan would be given 30 days to restore trade before imports would be halted. A similar proposal by Nelson last fall, before Japan briefly resumed beef trade, was adopted by the Senate, 72-26.

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns said earlier this week he was hopeful that Japan would lift the ban before the Japanese prime minister visits Washington, D.C., this month.

But this was a matter of compliance to the SRM removal rule which is directly linked to FOOD SAFETY. :roll: I guess Japan is just to over look that matter. :? Seems to me we are to over look alot when it comes to dealing with the US. Sandhusker maybe you should tell Nelson the same as you tell us. If he doesn't like the Japanese rules then sell US beef somewhere else and stop living off of Japan.
 
Murgen said:
"This is about fairness. Our beef is safe, and trade should resume immediately."

I know a lot of Canadians that said this very same thing.

Isn't it funny that fairness only comes into play when it is the US beef. :wink:
 
Tam said:
Murgen said:
"This is about fairness. Our beef is safe, and trade should resume immediately."

I know a lot of Canadians that said this very same thing.

Isn't it funny that fairness only comes into play when it is the US beef. :wink:

You think it was fair when a health law created to protect the US herd and US consumers was changed just for economics? It seems to me the rules were changed for Canadian beef - which you benefitted from. How soon we forget.......


I'm glad Nelson is actually taking a leadership position on this issue, as he should. I just wish he would be a little more busines like and take a look at it from the Japanese's angle. We should not be taking their beef, but we should not be forcing our standards on them, either.
 
Sandhusker said:
Tam said:
Murgen said:
I know a lot of Canadians that said this very same thing.

Isn't it funny that fairness only comes into play when it is the US beef. :wink:

You think it was fair when a health law created to protect the US herd and US consumers was changed just for economics? It seems to me the rules were changed for Canadian beef - which you benefitted from. How soon we forget.......


I'm glad Nelson is actually taking a leadership position on this issue, as he should. I just wish he would be a little more busines like and take a look at it from the Japanese's angle. We should not be taking their beef, but we should not be forcing our standards on them, either.

Back to the USDA rule changes. :roll: If the USDA is to stand on the rule of no imports from a country KNOWN TO HAVE BSE . Then how can Nelson and the rest of you force Japan to take your beef under any standards?

WE ALL KNOW YOU HAVE BSE. What we don't know is where it came from or where the feed mill was that made the feed that spread it or how many other cattle were affected by the same feed DO WE? You should be sitting in the UNDETERMINED CATAGORY but because of the NEW OIE rules that were changed after the US FOUND BSE. You will probably be bumped up to the negligible risk catagory. And we still will not know how big the problem is as the US will not be testing enough of the right cattle to show true prevalence will they? I can see with this new rule change, changes will happen to the USDA testing. I see them testing ALL OLD HIGH RISK CATTLE now as finding BSE in them will not change your risk catagory but if they risk testing a under ten year old and happen to find it then you will have to admit you are not negiligible due to your chicken crap loopholes.

Don't talk about rule changes until you look at why those rules were changed. And don't kid yourself those rules weren't change because of Canada they were changed to save the US beef industry's exports . And that was proved when the USDA made the statement to the affect that the US has to treat Canada as they would want other to treat the US in the face of finding BSE. If the USDA had stood on the rules you had, then you would not be supporting any thing, testing or trade sanctions or threats of cutting off Japans export if they didn't take your beef as you would NOT BE EXPORTING TO ANYONE. :x
 

Latest posts

Back
Top